Brian Wansink1, Andrew S Hanks. 1. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: What happens if a fast-food restaurant chain lowers the calories in a children's meal bundle (CMB), mainly by reducing the portion size of French fries? This study examines how such changes may influence within-meal selections. Specifically, do lower-calorie changes lead to within-meal calorie compensation? METHODS: Item-level anonymous transaction data were collected for thirty chain-owned representative U.S. restaurants during June, July, and August of 2011 (pre-changes) and 2012 (post-changes) with a focus on transaction records that included a CMB. Mixed-effects, repeated measures estimation techniques were used for the analysis. Outcome measures were the percentage and caloric profile of specific entrée items, side items, and beverages purchased in all children selecting meals. RESULTS: The new CMB resulted in selected children's meals that had an average of 18.8% fewer calories (P < 0.001). Additionally, a greater percentage of meals had milk (P < 0.001) compared to the prior year. CONCLUSION: Small changes in the automatic-or default-foods offered or promoted in children's meals can reduce calorie intake and improve the overall nutrition from selected foods as long as there is still an indulgence. Importantly, balancing a meal with smaller portions of favored foods might avoid reactance and overeating. Just as managers have done this in restaurants, parents can do this at home.
OBJECTIVE: What happens if a fast-food restaurant chain lowers the calories in a children's meal bundle (CMB), mainly by reducing the portion size of French fries? This study examines how such changes may influence within-meal selections. Specifically, do lower-calorie changes lead to within-meal calorie compensation? METHODS: Item-level anonymous transaction data were collected for thirty chain-owned representative U.S. restaurants during June, July, and August of 2011 (pre-changes) and 2012 (post-changes) with a focus on transaction records that included a CMB. Mixed-effects, repeated measures estimation techniques were used for the analysis. Outcome measures were the percentage and caloric profile of specific entrée items, side items, and beverages purchased in all children selecting meals. RESULTS: The new CMB resulted in selected children's meals that had an average of 18.8% fewer calories (P < 0.001). Additionally, a greater percentage of meals had milk (P < 0.001) compared to the prior year. CONCLUSION: Small changes in the automatic-or default-foods offered or promoted in children's meals can reduce calorie intake and improve the overall nutrition from selected foods as long as there is still an indulgence. Importantly, balancing a meal with smaller portions of favored foods might avoid reactance and overeating. Just as managers have done this in restaurants, parents can do this at home.
Authors: Megan P Mueller; Parke Wilde; Sara C Folta; Stephanie Anzman-Frasca; Christina D Economos Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Iana A Castro; Christine B Williams; Hala Madanat; Julie L Pickrel; Hee-Jin Jun; Michelle Zive; Sheila Gahagan; Guadalupe X Ayala Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Peter von Philipsborn; Jan M Stratil; Jacob Burns; Laura K Busert; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Stephanie Polus; Christina Holzapfel; Hans Hauner; Eva Rehfuess Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-06-12
Authors: Guadalupe X Ayala; Iana A Castro; Julie L Pickrel; Christine B Williams; Shih-Fan Lin; Hala Madanat; Hee-Jin Jun; Michelle Zive Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: F C Hillier-Brown; C D Summerbell; H J Moore; A Routen; A A Lake; J Adams; M White; V Araujo-Soares; C Abraham; A J Adamson; T J Brown Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Stephanie Anzman-Frasca; Franciel Dawes; Sarah Sliwa; Peter R Dolan; Miriam E Nelson; Kyle Washburn; Christina D Economos Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 6.457