Gang Fang1, Jennifer G Robinson, Julie Lauffenburger, Mary T Roth, Maurice Alan Brookhart. 1. *Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC †Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cardiology, College of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA ‡Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient long-term adherence to β-blockers, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is alarmingly low. It is unclear how prevalent patient adherence may be across small geographic areas and whether this geographic prevalence may vary. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using Medicare service claims files from 2007 to 2009 with Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and above who were alive 30 days after the index AMI hospitalization between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008 (N=85,017). The adjusted proportions of patients adherent to β-blockers, statins, and ACEIs/ARBs, respectively, in the 12 months after discharge across the 306 Hospital Referral Regions (HRRs) were measured and compared by control chart. The intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) and the additional prediction power from this small-area variation on individual patient adherence were assessed. RESULTS: The adjusted proportion of patients adherent across HRRs ranged from 58% to 74% (median, 66%) for β-blockers, from 57% to 67% (median, 63%) for ACEIs/ARBs, and from 58% to 73% (median, 66%) for statins. The ICC was 0.053 (95% CI, 0.043-0.064) for β-blockers, 0.050 (95% CI, 0.039-0.061) for ACEIs/ARBs, and 0.041 (95% CI, 0.031-0.052) for statins. The adjusted proportion of patients adherent across HRRs increased the c-statistic by 0.01-0.02 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence to evidence-based preventive therapies post-AMI among older adults was prevalent across small geographic regions. Moderate small-area variation in patient adherence exists.
BACKGROUND:Patient long-term adherence to β-blockers, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is alarmingly low. It is unclear how prevalent patient adherence may be across small geographic areas and whether this geographic prevalence may vary. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using Medicare service claims files from 2007 to 2009 with Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and above who were alive 30 days after the index AMI hospitalization between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008 (N=85,017). The adjusted proportions of patients adherent to β-blockers, statins, and ACEIs/ARBs, respectively, in the 12 months after discharge across the 306 Hospital Referral Regions (HRRs) were measured and compared by control chart. The intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) and the additional prediction power from this small-area variation on individual patient adherence were assessed. RESULTS: The adjusted proportion of patients adherent across HRRs ranged from 58% to 74% (median, 66%) for β-blockers, from 57% to 67% (median, 63%) for ACEIs/ARBs, and from 58% to 73% (median, 66%) for statins. The ICC was 0.053 (95% CI, 0.043-0.064) for β-blockers, 0.050 (95% CI, 0.039-0.061) for ACEIs/ARBs, and 0.041 (95% CI, 0.031-0.052) for statins. The adjusted proportion of patients adherent across HRRs increased the c-statistic by 0.01-0.02 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence to evidence-based preventive therapies post-AMI among older adults was prevalent across small geographic regions. Moderate small-area variation in patient adherence exists.
Authors: Dale R Burwen; Deron H Galusha; Jennifer M Lewis; Marjorie R Bedinger; Martha J Radford; Harlan M Krumholz; JoAnne Micale Foody Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-06-23
Authors: Geoffrey Adams; Martin C Gulliford; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Sandra Eldridge; Susan Chinn; Michael J Campbell Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Yuka Kiyota; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Robert J Glynn; Carolyn C Cannuscio; Jerry Avorn; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Kathleen M Schneider; Mary C Schroeder; Elena Letuchy; Robert B Wallace; Jennifer G Robinson; John M Brooks Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrew R Zullo; Sadia Sharmin; Yoojin Lee; Lori A Daiello; Nishant R Shah; W John Boscardin; David D Dore; Sei J Lee; Michael A Steinman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Brent M Egan; Susan E Sutherland; William F Childers; Ruthanne M Dahlheimer; George A Helmrich; Daryl A Lapeyrolerie; Nancy Markle; Dennis W Murphy; Locke Simmons; Robert A Davis; Peter Tilkemeier; Angelo Sinopoli Journal: Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2016-01-04
Authors: Vera Bittner; Lisandro D Colantonio; Yuling Dai; Mark Woodward; Matthew T Mefford; Robert S Rosenson; Paul Muntner; Keri L Monda; Meredith L Kilgore; Byron C Jaeger; Emily B Levitan Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Eleni Rapsomaniki; Marcus Thuresson; Erru Yang; Patrick Blin; Phillip Hunt; Sheng-Chia Chung; Dimitris Stogiannis; Mar Pujades-Rodriguez; Adam Timmis; Spiros C Denaxas; Nicolas Danchin; Michael Stokes; Florence Thomas-Delecourt; Cathy Emmas; Pål Hasvold; Em Jennings; Saga Johansson; David J Cohen; Tomas Jernberg; Nicholas Moore; Magnus Janzon; Harry Hemingway Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2016-07-01