Literature DB >> 24373568

Interventions available over the counter and advice for acute low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Christina Abdel Shaheed1, Christopher G Maher2, Kylie A Williams3, Andrew J McLachlan4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This systematic review evaluated evidence from randomized controlled trials investigating interventions available over the counter and advice that could be provided to people with acute low back pain. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, AMED, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO for eligible randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome measure was pain. Eligible controls included placebo, no treatment, or usual care. Two reviewers extracted data and rated study quality. A random effects model was used to pool trial effects with the overall strength of evidence described using the GRADE criteria. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (2,847 participants) evaluating advice, bed rest, simple analgesics (paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), heat application, and a topical rubefacient were included. There was low-quality evidence that bed rest is ineffective and very-low-quality evidence that advice is ineffective in the short, intermediate, and long terms. There was very-low-quality evidence that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ibuprofen and diclofenac "when required" dosing) provide an immediate analgesic effect (mean differences -10.9 [95% confidence interval = -17.6 to -4.2] and -11.3 [95% confidence interval = -17.8 to -4.9], respectively). There is very-low-quality evidence that heat wrap and a capsicum-based rubefacient provide an immediate analgesic effect (mean differences -13.5 [95% confidence interval = -21.3 to -5.7] and 17.5, P < .001, respectively), but there was no information on longer-term outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: There is limited evidence that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, heat wrap, and rubefacients provide immediate pain relief for acute back pain and that bed rest and advice are both ineffective. Future research is needed to provide evidence to support rational use of over-the-counter remedies and advice for people with acute low back pain.
Copyright © 2014 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; advice; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; over the counter; paracetamol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24373568     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  18 in total

1.  Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, or non-specific low back pain? A systematic review of systematic reviews by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.

Authors:  Jessica J Wong; Pierre Côté; Arthur Ameis; Sharanya Varatharajan; Thepikaa Varatharajan; Heather M Shearer; Robert J Brison; Deborah Sutton; Kristi Randhawa; Hainan Yu; Danielle Southerst; Rachel Goldgrub; Silvano Mior; Maja Stupar; Linda J Carroll; Anne Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Conservative treatment of nonspecific, chronic low back pain : Evidence of the efficacy - a systematic literature review].

Authors:  J Bredow; K Bloess; J Oppermann; C K Boese; L Löhrer; P Eysel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The effects of educational interventions on pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards low back pain.

Authors:  Christina Abdel Shaheed; Christopher G Maher; Wendy Mak; Kylie A Williams; Andrew J McLachlan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-04-08

Review 4.  Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Jean-François Chenot; Bernhard Greitemann; Bernd Kladny; Frank Petzke; Michael Pfingsten; Susanne Gabriele Schorr
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Participation of pharmacists in clinical trial recruitment for low back pain.

Authors:  Christina Abdel Shaheed; Christopher G Maher; Kylie A Williams; Andrew J McLachlan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-08-08

Review 6.  [Nonspecific low back pain and chronification].

Authors:  Wolfgang Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Clinical examination findings as prognostic factors in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisbeth Hartvigsen; Alice Kongsted; Lise Hestbaek
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2015-03-23

Review 8.  Interventions to improve gross motor performance in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Barbara R Lucas; Elizabeth J Elliott; Sarah Coggan; Rafael Z Pinto; Tracy Jirikowic; Sarah Westcott McCoy; Jane Latimer
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Nicoboxil/nonivamide cream effectively and safely reduces acute nonspecific low back pain - a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Zuzana Blahova; Janina Claudia Holm; Thomas Weiser; Erika Richter; Matthias Trampisch; Elena Akarachkova
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Effects of intracutaneous injections of sterile water in patients with acute low back pain: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

Authors:  J Z Cui; Z S Geng; Y H Zhang; J Y Feng; P Zhu; X B Zhang
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.