Literature DB >> 24373048

Do outcomes from transcatheter aortic valve implantation vary according to access route and valve type? The UK TAVI Registry.

Daniel J Blackman1, Paul D Baxter, Chris P Gale, Neil E Moat, Philip A Maccarthy, David Hildick-Smith, Uday Trivedi, David Cunningham, Mark A DE Belder, Peter F Ludman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether outcomes from transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vary according to access route and valve type in a real-world population.
BACKGROUND: Registry and uncontrolled trial data have found that patients undergoing nonfemoral TAVI have higher early and late mortality. It is not clear whether worse outcomes relate directly to access route. There have been no direct comparisons of outcomes according to valve type.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 1,620 patients undergoing TAVI in the UK and compared in 4 groups: SAPIEN transfemoral (TF); SAPIEN transapical (TA); CoreValve TF, CoreValve subclavian. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality.
RESULTS: Mortality in patients undergoing SAPIEN TAVI via a TA approach was higher than with TF at 30 days (11.2% vs. 4.4%, P < 0.01), 1 year (28.7% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.01), and 2 years (56.0% vs. 43.5%, P = 0.01). Logistic EuroSCORE was higher in TA patients (22.5 ± 12.9% vs. 17.7 ± 11.1%, P < 0.0001). After multivariable analysis TA access was associated with increased mortality at 30 days (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.46-4.48, P < 0.01) and 2 years (OR 1.75, 1.08-2.74, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in mortality at any time-point between patients treated with SAPIEN (n = 812) and CoreValve (n = 808) prostheses. CoreValve-treated patients had a higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (23.1% vs. 7.2%, P < 0.0001), and grade ≥2 aortic regurgitation on postprocedure echocardiography (13.0% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing TA TAVI experienced increased early and late mortality compared to a TF approach. Survival was not influenced by valve type.
© 2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24373048     DOI: 10.1111/joic.12084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of conduction disturbances after aortic valve intervention: current evidence.

Authors:  Manuel Martinez-Selles; Peter Bramlage; Martin Thoenes; Gerhard Schymik
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Differences in Outcomes and Indications between Sapien and CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Prostheses.

Authors:  Alia Noorani; Vinayak Bapat
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-04

3.  Peripheral Artery Disease and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes: A Report From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Therapy Registry.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Pratik Manandhar; David R Holmes; David J Cohen; J Kevin Harrison; G Chad Hughes; Vinod H Thourani; Michael J Mack; Matthew W Sherwood; W Schuyler Jones; Sreekanth Vemulapalli
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  A meta-analysis comparing transaxillary and transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Yong Zhan; Siavash Saadat; Avneet Soin; Masashi Kawabori; Frederick Y Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Cardiac surgery in 260 octogenarians: a case series.

Authors:  Anna Mara Scandroglio; Gabriele Finco; Marina Pieri; Roberto Ascari; Maria Grazia Calabrò; Daiana Taddeo; Francesca Isella; Annalisa Franco; Mario Musu; Giovanni Landoni; Ottavio Alfieri; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  European real world trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: systematic review and meta-analysis of European national registries.

Authors:  G Krasopoulos; F Falconieri; U Benedetto; J Newton; R Sayeed; R Kharbanda; A Banning
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Use of Internal Endoconduit for Unfavorable Iliac Artery Anatomy in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Yung-Tsai Lee; Wei-Hsian Yin; Ho-Ping Yu; Jeng Wei
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 8.  Advanced age and the clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Osama Alsara; Ahmad Alsarah; Heather Laird-Fick
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  TAVI: New trials and registries offer further welcome evidence - U.S. CoreValve, CHOICE, and GARY.

Authors:  Michele Pighi; Roberta Serdoz; Ismail Dogu Kilic; Sara Abou Sherif; Alistair Lindsay; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2014-01-29

Review 10.  Conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures - predictors and management.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wilczek; Rafał Reguła; Kamil Bujak; Piotr Chodór; Michał Długaszek; Mariusz Gąsior
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.