Literature DB >> 24371523

Metabolic alterations in different stages of hypertension in an apparently healthy nigerian population.

M A Charles-Davies1, A A Fasanmade2, J A Olaniyi3, O E Oyewole4, M O Owolabi2, J R Adebusuyi5, O Hassan5, M T Ajobo6, M O Ebesunun7, K Adigun8, K S Akinlade1, U A Fabian1, O O Popoola1, S K Rahamon1, W Okunbolade1, M A Ogunlakin1, O G Arinola1, E O Agbedana1.   

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MS) amplifies hypertension (HTN) associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). MS components and other CVD risk measures were investigated in different stages of hypertension. 534 apparently healthy Nigerian traders aged 18-105 years were participants of a cohort study. The International Diabetes Federation (2005) and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee criteria were used for MS and HTN classifications, respectively. Anthropometric indices were obtained by standard methods. Levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) were determined by enzymatic methods, while low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) was calculated. Data analysed statistically were significant at P < 0.05. 143 (26.8%), 197 (36.9%), and 194 (36.3%) of the traders had normotension, pre-HTN and HTN (stages 1 and 2), respectively. All indices tested except HDLC were significantly different among BP groups (P < 0.05). Waist to hip (WHR) and waist to height (WHT) ratios were significantly different between HTN groups (P < 0.05). HTN was associated with MS and female gender (P < 0.05). Metabolic alterations and significant HTN were observed. Treatment of the individual components of the syndrome and improvement of modifiable metabolic factors may be necessary to reduce MS and high BP.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24371523      PMCID: PMC3858970          DOI: 10.1155/2013/351357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hypertens            Impact factor:   2.420


1. Introduction

Hypertension (HTN) is an important public health issue worldwide and it is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and renal diseases. It is defined as blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140-systolic (SBP) and/or ≥90 mmHg-diastolic (DBP) or being on drug therapy [1]. BP (SBP and/or DBP) for adults aged ≥18 years has been classified as normal (<120 and <80 mmHg), pre-HTN (120–139 or 80–90 mmHg), stage 1 HTN (140–159 or 90–99 mmHg), and stage 2 HTN (≥160 or ≥100 mmHg) [2]. HTN is more prevalent in Africa and associated with more complications in Blacks. It is the most prevalent cause of end-stage renal disease in West Africa and an important cardiovascular risk factor worldwide [1, 3, 4]. Ulasi et al. [1] reported an alarming prevalence of HTN in 42.2% of market workers with majority of them not aware of the disease. The high prevalence of HTN was attributed to their sedentary lifestyle, consumption of salt-laden fast food, and obesity. HTN is one of the components of metabolic syndrome (MS), a cluster of risk factors that includes obesity, insulin resistance, HTN, and dyslipidemia unequivocally linked to an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [5]. MS and its co-morbidities hyperglycemia, abdominal obesity, and hypertriglyceridemia were found to be higher in hypertensives compared to the general population [6]. MS is prevalent among traders in Nigeria and has been associated with obesity and gender [7]. The MS amplifies cardiovascular risk associated with high BP in hypertensives, independent of the effect of several traditional cardiovascular risk factors [8]. The double burden of communicable and noncommunicable diseases are well known in Africa with economic implications [1, 3]. Early detection and management of HTN-related metabolic derangements may prevent pandemic of morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. The association of different stages of HTN and various measures of cardiovascular risk has not been adequately investigated among Nigerians. Components of the MS and other CVD risk measures were thus investigated in different stages of HTN among apparently healthy Nigerian traders.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. Study Design

The study was a cohort study conducted over a period of 6 months and ethical approval was obtained from the Joint Ethical Committee of the University of Ibadan/University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria (UI/UCH).

2.2. Participants

534 (170 males and 364 females) apparently healthy traders from a local market in Bodija, Ibadan, aged 18–105 years participated in the study. In collaboration with leaders of their market association who were adequately informed about the study in their local language, Yoruba, recruitment of the participants was done by consecutive selection of all apparently healthy traders without DM (from their pretest questionnaire) that gave informed consent. Selection was not based on age, gender, or HTN. They were part of a cohort study on Risk Assessment of DM in Individuals with MS in Ibadan, South-West, Nigeria, conducted in the Department of Chemical Pathology, College of Medicine, UI.

2.3. Classes of HTN

Participants were classified into different BP (SBP and/or DSP) groups-normal (BP: <120 and <80 mmHg), pre-HTN (BP: 120–139 or 80–89 mmHg), stage 1 HTN (BP: 140–159 or 90–99 mmHg), and stage 2 HTN (BP: ≥160 or ≥100 mmHg) [2].

2.4. Diagnosis of MS

MS was made using the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) diagnostic criteria [9]. The criteria include central obesity (WC) (male: ≥94 cm, female: ≥80 cm) and any two of raised triglycerides (TG): ≥150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L), reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) (males: <40 mg/dL, females: < 50 mg/dL, raised BP (≥130/≥85 mmHg), or raised fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (≥100 mg/dL).

2.5. Components of MS

These were parameters contained in the IDF for MS-WC, TG, HDLC, BP, and FPG [9]. These were measured by standard methods described elsewhere [7, 10].

2.6. Measures of Adiposity and Lipids

Adiposity measures included body weight, height, body mass index (BMI), hip circumference (HC), waist hip ratio (WHR), waist height ratio (WHT), and percentage body fat (PBF). Lipids (other than HDLC and TG-components of MS) were total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC). Methods described by Umoh et al. [10] and Charles-Davies et al. [7] were used for these measures.

2.7. Sample Collection

6 mL of venous blood sample was aseptically obtained by venipuncture from the participants after an overnight fast (10–14 h). 4 mL was dispensed into potassium ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (K3EDTA) tube for the determination of lipid profile (TC, TG, and HDLC). 2 mL was dispensed into fluoride oxalate tube for FPG estimation. All samples were centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min after which plasma/serum were aspirated in small aliquots into clean vials and stored at −20°C until analyses were done.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software 15.0 version. Post hoc tests were used for comparison of quantitative variables. Chi-square test (χ 2) was used to find relationship between two qualitative variables. Two-tailed independent t-test of significance at 95% confidence limit with P < 0.05 was considered significant for the variables.

3. Results and Discussion

HTN is frequently undiagnosed until relatively late in its course leading to kidney damage and heart failure [11]. In this study, 143 (26.8%) of the traders had normotension while 194 (36.3%) of them had stages 1 and 2 HTN. This is rather alarming for a group of apparently healthy individuals. Our findings corroborate those of Ulasi et al. [1] in a similar group studied. HTN is a known component of MS, a syndrome that increases the risk of developing CVD and DM. Table 1 shows significant associations of BP with MS and female gender (P < 0.05). MS represents a strong and independent risk factor for future CVD in patients with HTN, over and above the prognostic information provided by all other traditional cardiovascular risk markers [8, 12]. Among the participants who had MS, 10 (5.6%) had normotension, 44 (24.9%) had pre-HTN, while 123 (69.5%) had stages 1 and 2 HTN. On the other hand, among the participants with non-MS, 133 (37.3%) had normotension, 153 (42.9%) had pre-HTN, while 71 (19.9%) had stages 1 and 2 HTN. Bulhoes and Araujo [13] reported a prevalence of 0.8 to 35.3% as a range of metabolic abnormalities associated with HTN in control and HTN groups. The male : female distributions among the blood pressure groups in our study were normotension—31.8% versus 24.5%, pre-HTN—47.1% versus 32.1%, and HTN (stages 1 and 2) 21.1% versus 43.4%, respectively. Associations of MS with obesity and female gender were previously observed by our team [7].
Table 1

Association of BP groups with gender and MS in traders.

Blood pressure classesMetabolic syndromeTotal χ 2 P
Non-MSMS
n (%)357 (66.9%)177 (33.1%)534 (100%)
Normotension133 (93%) 10 (7.0%)143 (100%)137.3<0.001
Pre-HTN153 (77.7%) 44 (22.3%)197 (100%)
Stage 1 HTN 47 (41.2%) 67 (58.8%)114 (100%)
Stage 2 HTN 24 (30%) 56 (70%)80 (100%)

Gender
MaleFemale

n (%) 170 (31.8%)364 (24.5%)534 (100%)
Normotension 54 (31.8%) 89 (24.2%)143 (26.8%)25.1<0.001
Pre-HTN 80 (47.1%)117 (32.1%)197 (36.9%)
Stage 1 HTN 22 (12.9%)92 (25.3%)114 (21.3%)
Stage 2 HTN 14 (8.2%)66 (18.1%)80 (15.0%)

values are in number of participants with percentage in parenthesis, n: number of participants, %: percentage, P: probability, †: significant, non-MS: non-metabolic syndrome, MS: metabolic syndrome, HTN: hypertension, χ 2: chi-square test.

HTN is associated with the laboratory and anthropometric findings linked to MS. Central obesity and insulin resistance recognised as the main factors involved in the pathophysiology of the MS have been postulated to contribute to elevated blood pressure, which further promotes vascular damage in cardiac, renal, and brain tissues [11]. Table 2 shows comparison of MS components (BP-SBP and DBP, WC, FPG, TG) between BP groups (using post hoc tests). There were significant increases in levels of BP from normal to stage 2 HTN (P < 0.001). Significant increases in WC (a measure of central obesity/visceral fat) from normal to stage 2 HTN were also observed between all groups (P < 0.003) except in the comparison between stage 1 and stage 2 HTN (P > 0.05). Visceral fat is a metabolically active organ that is strongly related to insulin sensitivity. Visceral adipose tissue secretes leptin, an adipocytokine associated with the processes of inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, HTN, and atherogenesis [11, 14, 15]. Obesity, especially visceral adipose tissue accumulation, increases the risk of developing DM and may be linked to HTN through sympathetic nervous system overactivation [7, 11, 16]. Results of our previous study showed that increases in leptin levels in individuals with and without MS and DM might reflect adiposity as well as a compensatory mechanism for maintenance of weight/fat loss and BP [16].
Table 2

Comparison of components of MS among BP groups.

Variables BP GroupValue BP group Value P
SBP (mmHg) Normotension107.4 ± 4.8Pre-HTN122.0 ± 6.4<0.001
Normotension107.4 ± 4.8Stage 1 HTN139.0 ± 8.6<0.001
Normotension107.4 ± 4.8Stage 2 HTN170.1 ± 25.5<0.001
Pre-HTN122.0 ± 6.4Stage 1 HTN139.0 ± 8.6<0.001
Pre-HTN122.0 ± 6.4Stage 2 HTN170.1 ± 25.5<0.001
Stage 1 HTN139.0 ± 8.6Stage 2 HTN170.1 ± 25.5<0.001

DBP (mmHg) Normotension69.4 ± 2.9Pre-HTN76.6 ± 5.0<0.001
Normotension69.4 ± 2.9Stage 1 HTN85.9 ± 6.2<0.001
Normotension69.4 ± 2.9Stage 2 HTN102.5 ± 12.8<0.001
Pre-HTN76.6 ± 5.0Stage 1 HTN85.9 ± 6.2<0.001
Pre-HTN76.6 ± 5.0Stage 2 HTN102.5 ± 12.8<0.001
Stage 1 HTN85.9 ± 6.2Stage 2 HTN102.5 ± 12.8<0.001

WC (cm)Normotension88.2 ± 12.0Pre-HTN92.6 ± 13.60.002
Normotension88.2 ± 12.0 Stage 1 HTN98.5 ± 12.4<0.001
Normotension88.2 ± 12.0Stage 2 HTN102.0 ± 12.7<0.001
Pre-HTN92.6 ± 13.6Stage 1 HTN98.5 ± 12.4<0.001
Pre-HTN92.6 ± 13.6Stage 2 HTN102.0 ± 12.7<0.001

FPG (mmol/L) Normotension4.7 ± 1.4Stage 2 HTN5.0 ± 1.90.042
Stage 1 HTN4.6 ± 0.9Stage 2 HTN5.0 ± 1.90.034

TG (mmol/L) Normotension0.7 ± 0.3Stage 1 HTN0.8 ± 0.40.047
Normotension0.7 ± 0.3Stage 2 HTN0.9 ± 0.40.001
Pre-HTN0.8 ± 0.4Stage 2 HTN0.9 ± 0.40.047

P: probability, †: significant, values are in mean ± s.d, n: number of participants, BP: blood pressure, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, WC: waist circumference, TG: Triglyceride, FPG: fasting plasma glucose, MS: metabolic syndrome, HTN: hypertension, number of participants in normotension, pre-HTN, stage 1 HTN, stage 2 HTN groups = 143, 197, 114, 80, respectively; total number of participants = 534.

Insulin resistance and the resulting hyperinsulinemia induce BP elevation by the activation of the sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with consequential sodium retention and volume expansion, endothelial dysfunction, and alteration in renal function [11]. Syed et al. [17] observed impaired and high glucose levels in pre-HTN, while Ulasi et al. [6] observed hyperglycemia in the HTN group in their study. Contrarily, in this present study, significant increases in the mean FPG concentrations from normotension and stage 1 HTN to stage 2 HTN were observed (P < 0.05, Table 2), although these levels were within the normal reference range. The mean TG levels in this present study increased significantly from normotension to stages 1 and 2 HTN as well pre-HTN to stage 2 HTN (P < 0.05). Again, these levels in all HTN groups were within normal reference range, a finding contrary to an earlier report of significant hypertriglyceridemia in HTN in a similar population in Nigeria [6]. The mean (s.d) levels of HDLC in normotension, pre-HTN, stage 1 HTN, stage 2 HTN and all participants were 1.1 (0.3), 1.1 (0.4), 1.1 (0.5), 1.1 (0.4), and 1.1 (0.4) mmol/L, respectively. Comparisons of mean HDLC levels among all BP groups did not show significant differences (P > 0.05). Moreover, HDLC levels were generally low-normal levels in the apparently healthy traders. These findings suggest that the contribution of HDLC (a MS component) to the high prevalence of HTN in this present study may be limited. Table 3 shows comparisons of means of non-MS components among BP groups using post hoc tests. The mean height, body weight, BMI, HC, WHT, WHR, PBF, TC, and LDLC showed significant differences among BP groups (P < 0.05). The mean WHR and WHT were significantly different between all BP groups (P < 0.05). WHR is positively and independently related to the occurrence of arterial HTN [17]. WHT (an improved index over WC) is a simple and practical index for assessing central fat distribution and metabolic risk in men and women [18].
Table 3

Comparison of non-MS components among BP groups.

Variable BP groupValue BP groupValue P
Height (m) Normotension1.64 ± 0.08Stage 1 HTN1.61 ± 0.070.041
Normotension1.64 ± 0.08Stage 2 HTN1.61 ± 0.150.039
Pre-HTN1.65 ± 0.08Stage 1 HTN1.61 ± 0.070.003
Pre-HTN1.65 ± 0.08Stage 2 HTN1.61 ± 0.150.004

Body weight (kg) Normotension65.1 ± 11.4Pre-HTN69.6 ± 13.80.002
Normotension65.1 ± 11.4Stage 1 HTN 73.1 ± 13.6<0.001
Normotension65.1 ± 11.4Stage 2 HTN76.5 ± 15.8<0.001
Pre-HTN69.6 ± 13.8Stage 1 HTN 73.1 ± 13.60.028
Pre-HTN69.6 ± 13.8Stage 2 HTN76.5 ± 15.8<0.001

BMI (kg/m2) Normotension24.4 ± 4.4Pre-HTN25.7 ± 5.10.024
Normotension24.4 ± 4.4Stage 1 HTN28.1 ± 5.0<0.001
Normotension24.4 ± 4.4Stage 2 HTN29.3 ± 6.3<0.001
Pre-HTN25.7 ± 5.1Stage 1 HTN28.1 ± 5.0<0.001
Pre-HTN25.7 ± 5.1Stage 2 HTN29.3 ± 6.3<0.001

HC (cm) Normotension97.5 ± 9.9Pre-HTN100.7 ± 10.8<0.006
Normotension97.5 ± 9.9Stage 1 HTN105.2 ± 10.3 <0.001
Normotension97.5 ± 9.9Stage 2 HTN106.6 ± 10.6<0.001
Pre-HTN100.7 ± 10.8Stage 1 HTN105.2 ± 10.3<0.001
Pre-HTN100.7 ± 10.8Stage 2 HTN106.6 ± 10.6<0.001

PBF Normotension28.4 ± 11.9Stage 1 HTN37.6 ± 9.9<0.001
Normotension28.4 ± 11.9Stage 2 HTN38.8 ± 9.7<0.001
Pre-HTN30.7 ± 11.5Stage 1 HTN37.6 ± 9.9<0.001
Pre-HTN30.7 ± 11.5Stage 2 HTN38.8 ± 9.7<0.001

WHT Normotension54.1 ± 8.2Pre-HTN56.4 ± 8.90.036
Normotension54.1 ± 8.2Stage 1 HTN61.2 ± 8.1<0.001
Normotension54.1 ± 8.2Stage 2 HTN64.6 ± 16.8<0.001
Pre-HTN56.4 ± 8.9Stage 1 HTN61.2 ± 8.1<0.001
Pre-HTN56.4 ± 8.9Stage 2 HTN64.6 ± 16.8<0.001
Stage 1 HTN61.2 ± 8.1Stage 2 HTN64.6 ± 16.80.021

WHR Normotension0.9 ± 0.1Pre-HTN0.92 ± 0.10.048
Normotension0.9 ± 0.1Stage 1 HTN0.94 ± 0.1<0.001
Normotension0.9 ± 0.1Stage 2 HTN0.96 ± 0.1<0.001
Pre-HTN0.92 ± 0.1Stage 1 HTN0.94 ± 0.10.030
Pre-HTN0.92 ± 0.1Stage 2 HTN0.96 ± 0.1<0.001
Stage 1 HTN0.94 ± 0.1Stage 2 HTN0.96 ± 0.10.030

TC (mmol/L) Normotension3.5 ± 1.1Stage 1 HTN3.9 ± 1.00.016
Normotension3.5 ± 1.1Stage 2 HTN3.9 ± 1.10.018

LDLC (mmol/L) Normotension2.1 ± 0.9Stage 1 HTN2.4 ± 0.90.032
Normotension2.1 ± 0.9Stage 2 HTN2.4 ± 1.00.032

values are in mean ± s.d, P: probability, †: significant, HTN: hypertension, MS: metabolic syndrome, PBF: Percentage body fat, BP: blood pressure, WHT: waist to height ratio, WHR: waist to hip ratio, TC: Total Cholesterol, LDLC: low density lipoprotein cholesterol, number of participants in normotension, pre-HTN, Stage 1 HTN, Stage 2 HTN are 143, 197, 114, 80, respectively; total number of participants = 534.

The mean height, body weight, BMI, and HC were significantly different (P < 0.05) among all BP groups except those between stages 1 and 2 HTN (P > 0.05). There were significant reductions in height from untreatable groups (normotension and pre-HTP) to treatable groups (stages 1 and 2 HTN). Significant differences were observed in the comparison of PBF between normotension and HTN (stages 1 and 2) groups as well as between pre-HTN and HTN (stages 1 and 2) groups (P < 0.05). There were also significant increases in TC and its lipoprotein-LDLC from normotension to treatable HTN (stages 1 and 2) (P < 0.05) in this study. These findings may be helpful in the management of HTN. MS considerably increases the risk of cardiovascular and renal events in HTN [19] but represents a useful and simple clinical concept that allows for the early detection of DM and CVD [11]. Lifestyle modification is the cornerstone of management in all patients with pre-HTN or with the MS [2]. Elevated levels of WHR, BMI, FPG, TC, and TG were reportedly responsible for the progression of pre-HTN stage to HTN stage1 [17]. Thus, the treatment of the individual components of the syndrome and improvement of modifiable risk factors may be necessary to reduce the triad of obesity, MS, and high BP [19]. Pre-HTN is not a disease category but will identify individuals at high risk of developing hypertension, for adequate intervention to prevent or delay the development of the disease. In this present study, 197 (36.9%) of the traders had pre-HTN. 80 (47.1%) of the males and 117 (32.1%) of females had pre-HTN. Only 44 (22.3%) of traders with pre-HTN had MS (Table 1), a finding at variance with a previous report indicating that a vast majority of individuals with pre-HTN had MS [2]. The synergistic impact of HTN and other components of MS illustrate the need for screening for the MS in patients with HTN at initial diagnosis [8]. WHR and WHT may be objective and cheap measures in the assessment of the MS and may further refine cardiovascular risk stratification in HTN. These measures have the advantage of not contaminating the environment and reducing concerns of inaccuracy from mercury and nonmercury sphygmomanometers, respectively [2]. Patients with HTN and MS are at increased risk of CVD and require more vigorous nondrug preventive approach [13]. There is an indication for metabolic screening, dietary and lifestyle modification not only in all patients with HTN at the first diagnosis [8] but also in traders with pre-HTN and the community.

4. Conclusion

Metabolic alterations and HTN were observed in traders studied. The significant percentage of individuals with pre-HTN particularly in those without MS is of great concern. Health education and promotion, metabolic screening, and adoption of healthy lifestyles by all persons are critical for the prevention of high BP and should be included in the routine workup and management of patients with HTN.
  14 in total

1.  The metabolic syndrome in hypertension: European society of hypertension position statement.

Authors:  Josep Redon; Renata Cifkova; Stephane Laurent; Peter Nilsson; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Serap Erdine; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Influence of metabolic syndrome on hypertension-related target organ damage.

Authors:  G Mulè; E Nardi; S Cottone; P Cusimano; V Volpe; G Piazza; R Mongiovì; G Mezzatesta; G Andronico; G Cerasola
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 4.  Adipocytokines and the metabolic complications of obesity.

Authors:  Neda Rasouli; Philip A Kern
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Prognostic value of the metabolic syndrome in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Giuseppe Schillaci; Matteo Pirro; Gaetano Vaudo; Fabio Gemelli; Simona Marchesi; Carlo Porcellati; Elmo Mannarino
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Anthropometric and metabolic indicators in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Sadiqa Syed; Mozaffer Rahim Hingorjo; Amynah Charania; Masood A Qureshi
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.711

Review 7.  Adiposity and cardiovascular disorders: disturbance of the regulatory system consisting of humoral and neuronal signals.

Authors:  Hideki Katagiri; Tetsuya Yamada; Yoshitomo Oka
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 8.  Kidney diseases in Africa: aetiological considerations, peculiarities and burden.

Authors:  O Okunola; A Akinsola; O Ayodele
Journal:  Afr J Med Med Sci       Date:  2012-06

9.  High prevalence and low awareness of hypertension in a market population in enugu, Nigeria.

Authors:  Ifeoma I Ulasi; Chinwuba K Ijoma; Basden J C Onwubere; Ejikeme Arodiwe; Obinna Onodugo; Christian Okafor
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.420

10.  2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad; Josep Redon; Anna Dominiczak; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter M Nilsson; Michel Burnier; Margus Viigimaa; Ettore Ambrosioni; Mark Caufield; Antonio Coca; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland E Schmieder; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Thierry C Gillebert; Michal Tendera; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefan D Anker; Johann Bauersachs; Jana Brguljan Hitij; Mark Caulfield; Marc De Buyzere; Sabina De Geest; Geneviève Anne Derumeaux; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Christian Funck-Brentano; Vjekoslav Gerc; Giuseppe Germano; Stephan Gielen; Herman Haller; Arno W Hoes; Jens Jordan; Thomas Kahan; Michel Komajda; Dragan Lovic; Heiko Mahrholdt; Michael Hecht Olsen; Jan Ostergren; Gianfranco Parati; Joep Perk; Jorge Polonia; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Lars Rydén; Yuriy Sirenko; Alice Stanton; Harry Struijker-Boudier; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Massimo Volpe; David A Wood
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Big Data and Blood Pressure Control: Insights from the PAMELA and BP-CARE Study Cohorts.

Authors:  M Bombelli; Rita Facchetti; Giuseppe Mancia; Guido Grassi
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  The prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension among workers in West Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  William K Bosu
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Male Sexual Dysfunction, Leptin, Pituitary and Gonadal Hormones in Nigerian Males with Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Unyime Aniekpon Fabian; Mabel Ayebatonyo Charles-Davies; Adesoji Adedipe Fasanmade; John Ayodele Olaniyi; Oyediran Emmanuel Oyewole; Mayowa Ojo Owolabi; Jane Roli Adebusuyi; Olufunke Olayemi Hassan; Babatunde Mohammed Ajobo; Maria Onomhaguan Ebesunun; Kehinde Adigun; Kehinde Sola Akinlade; Olatubosun Ganiyu Arinola; Emmanuel Oluyemi Agbedana
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

4.  Sex Disparity in Blood Pressure Levels Among Nigerian Health Workers.

Authors:  Abiodun M Adeoye; Adewole Adebiyi; Mayowa O Owolabi; Daniel T Lackland; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Bamidele O Tayo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Determinants of Mean Blood Pressure and Hypertension among Workers in West Africa.

Authors:  William K Bosu
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.420

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.