Literature DB >> 24370860

Community air monitoring for pesticides-part 2: multiresidue determination of pesticides in air by gas chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Matt Hengel1, P Lee.   

Abstract

Two multiresidue methods were developed to determine pesticides in air collected in California. Pesticides were trapped using XAD-4 resin and extracted with ethyl acetate. Based on an analytical method from the University of California Davis Trace Analytical Laboratory, pesticides were detected by analyzing the extract by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to determine chlorothalonil, chlorthal-dimethyl, cycloate, dicloran, dicofol, EPTC, ethalfluralin, iprodione, mefenoxam, metolachlor, PCNB, permethrin, pronamide, simazine, trifluralin, and vinclozolin. A GC with a flame photometric detector was used to determine chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos oxon, diazinon, diazinon oxon, dimethoate, dimethoate oxon, fonophos, fonophos oxon, malathion, malathion oxon, naled, and oxydemeton. Trapping efficiencies ranged from 78 to 92 % for low level (0.5 μg) and 37-104 % for high level (50 and 100 μg) recoveries. Little to no degradation of compounds occurred over 31 days; recoveries ranged from 78 to 113 %. In the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) method, pesticides were detected by analyzing the extract by GC-MS to determine chlorothalonil, chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, dichlorvos, dicofol, endosulfan 1, endosulfan sulfate, oxyfluorfen, permethrin, propargite, and trifluralin. A liquid chromatograph coupled to a MS was used to determine azinphos-methyl, chloropyrifos oxon, DEF, diazinon, diazinon oxon, dimethoate, dimethoate oxon, diuron, EPTC, malathion, malathion oxon, metolachlor, molinate, norflurazon, oryzalin, phosmet, propanil, simazine and thiobencarb. Trapping efficiencies for compounds determined by the CDFA method ranged from 10 to 113, 22 to 114, and 56 to 132 % for 10, 5, and 2 μg spikes, respectively. Storage tests yielded 70-170 % recovery for up to 28 days. These multiresidue methods represent flexible, sensitive, accurate, and cost-effective ways to determine residues of various pesticides in ambient air.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24370860     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3395-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  3 in total

1.  Pesticides in the atmosphere of the Mississippi River Valley, part II--air.

Authors:  W T Foreman; M S Majewski; D A Goolsby; F W Wiebe; R H Coupe
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Screening method for pesticides in air by gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  F J Egea Gonzalez; A Mena Granero; C R Glass; A Garrido Frenich; J L Martinez Vidal
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 3: using health-based screening levels to evaluate results collected for a year.

Authors:  Pamela Wofford; Randy Segawa; Jay Schreider; Veda Federighi; Rosemary Neal; Madeline Brattesani
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.513

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 1: selecting pesticides and a community.

Authors:  Randy Segawa; Johanna Levine; Rosemary Neal; Madeline Brattesani
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 3: using health-based screening levels to evaluate results collected for a year.

Authors:  Pamela Wofford; Randy Segawa; Jay Schreider; Veda Federighi; Rosemary Neal; Madeline Brattesani
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.513

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.