Literature DB >> 24362496

Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 1: selecting pesticides and a community.

Randy Segawa1, Johanna Levine, Rosemary Neal, Madeline Brattesani.   

Abstract

The CA Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) developed methods to select pesticides and a community to fulfill criteria for an ambient air monitoring study it conducted as part of the CA Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Justice Action Plan. Using a scoring system, CDPR evaluated 100 pesticides based on statewide-reported pesticide use, volatility, and priority in CDPR's risk assessment process (indicators of exposure and toxicity) to produce a list of pesticides to consider as candidates for monitoring. The CDPR also evaluated and scored 83 communities based on demographics and health factors, availability of cumulative impacts data, and reported pesticide use to create a list of community candidates. The scores provide relative rankings to distinguish more highly impacted communities from less impacted ones and to identify which pesticides might contribute most to potential adverse health effects. These methods use criteria that can be quantified, validated, and verified in order to provide a transparent and fair selection process. Based on public comments and highest scores, CDPR recommended 40 pesticides (including some of their degradation products) and one community for its yearlong monitoring study. The CDPR then further refined its list of pesticides by soliciting input from local and technical advisory groups. The CDPR plans to use these methods to select pesticides and communities in future monitoring activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24362496     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3507-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  4 in total

1.  Environmental justice implications of reduced reporting requirements of the Toxics Release Inventory Burden Reduction Rule.

Authors:  Marie Lynn Miranda; Martha H Keating; Sharon E Edwards
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 3: using health-based screening levels to evaluate results collected for a year.

Authors:  Pamela Wofford; Randy Segawa; Jay Schreider; Veda Federighi; Rosemary Neal; Madeline Brattesani
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Community air monitoring for pesticides-part 2: multiresidue determination of pesticides in air by gas chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Matt Hengel; P Lee
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Separate and unequal: residential segregation and estimated cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics in U.S. metropolitan areas.

Authors:  Rachel Morello-Frosch; Bill M Jesdale
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 3: using health-based screening levels to evaluate results collected for a year.

Authors:  Pamela Wofford; Randy Segawa; Jay Schreider; Veda Federighi; Rosemary Neal; Madeline Brattesani
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.513

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.