PURPOSE: We assessed the in vivo release profile of bevacizumab from and biocompatibility of poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-(serinol hexamethylene urethane), or ESHU, a thermoresponsive hydrogel administered intravitreally for drug delivery. METHODS: The technical feasibility of injection was assessed quantitatively via mechanical testing. For in vivo studies, New Zealand White rabbit eyes were injected intravitreally with 0.05 mL of either: ESHU dissolved in 25 mg/mL bevacizumab, ESHU dissolved in PBS, or 25 mg/mL bevacizumab. Clinical examination included IOP measurements and examination with indirect ophthalmoscopy for signs of inflammation. Additionally, eyes were examined histologically following euthanasia. To quantify bevacizumab release, aqueous humor samples were obtained via anterior chamber paracentesis and ELISA was used to determine the concentration of drug weekly. In vitro cytotoxicity testing also was performed using bovine corneal endothelial cells. RESULTS: The ESHU was injected easily through a 31-gauge needle, was well tolerated in vivo, and caused minimal cell death in vitro when compared to other common materials, such as silicone oil. The long-term presence of the gel did not affect IOP, and there was no evidence of inflammation histologically or through indirect observation. The ESHU sustained the release of bevacizumab for over 9 weeks and maintained a drug concentration that averaged 4.7 times higher than eyes receiving bolus bevacizumab injections. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating sustained bevacizumab release in vivo from an intravitreally injected hydrogel formulation, suggesting that this delivery system may be a promising candidate for ocular drug delivery.
PURPOSE: We assessed the in vivo release profile of bevacizumab from and biocompatibility of poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-(serinol hexamethylene urethane), or ESHU, a thermoresponsive hydrogel administered intravitreally for drug delivery. METHODS: The technical feasibility of injection was assessed quantitatively via mechanical testing. For in vivo studies, New Zealand White rabbit eyes were injected intravitreally with 0.05 mL of either: ESHU dissolved in 25 mg/mL bevacizumab, ESHU dissolved in PBS, or 25 mg/mL bevacizumab. Clinical examination included IOP measurements and examination with indirect ophthalmoscopy for signs of inflammation. Additionally, eyes were examined histologically following euthanasia. To quantify bevacizumab release, aqueous humor samples were obtained via anterior chamber paracentesis and ELISA was used to determine the concentration of drug weekly. In vitro cytotoxicity testing also was performed using bovine corneal endothelial cells. RESULTS: The ESHU was injected easily through a 31-gauge needle, was well tolerated in vivo, and caused minimal cell death in vitro when compared to other common materials, such as silicone oil. The long-term presence of the gel did not affect IOP, and there was no evidence of inflammation histologically or through indirect observation. The ESHU sustained the release of bevacizumab for over 9 weeks and maintained a drug concentration that averaged 4.7 times higher than eyes receiving bolus bevacizumab injections. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating sustained bevacizumab release in vivo from an intravitreally injected hydrogel formulation, suggesting that this delivery system may be a promising candidate for ocular drug delivery.
Authors: Donald J D'Amico; H N Masonson; Manju Patel; A P Adamis; E T Cunningham; D R Guyer; B Katz Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Charlotte Schramm; Martin S Spitzer; Sigrid Henke-Fahle; Gabriele Steinmetz; Kai Januschowski; Peter Heiduschka; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Tilo Biedermann; Karl U Bartz-Schmidt; Peter Szurman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Frank G Holz; Winfried Amoaku; Juan Donate; Robyn H Guymer; Ulrich Kellner; Reinier O Schlingemann; Andreas Weichselberger; Giovanni Staurenghi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Sanja B Turturro; Micah J Guthrie; Alyssa A Appel; Pawel W Drapala; Eric M Brey; Victor H Pérez-Luna; William F Mieler; Jennifer J Kang-Mieler Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2011-02-12 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: David R Fintak; Gaurav K Shah; Kevin J Blinder; Carl D Regillo; John Pollack; Jeffrey S Heier; Hussein Hollands; Sanjay Sharma Journal: Retina Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Sophie J Bakri; Melissa R Snyder; Joel M Reid; Jose S Pulido; Mohamed K Ezzat; Ravinder J Singh Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Blessing C Ilochonwu; Marko Mihajlovic; Roel F Maas-Bakker; Charis Rousou; Miao Tang; Mei Chen; Wim E Hennink; Tina Vermonden Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 6.978
Authors: Henrik Barth; Sven Crafoord; Timothy M O'Shea; Christopher D Pritchard; Robert Langer; Fredrik Ghosh Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 3.117