Literature DB >> 22128556

Human echolocation: pitch versus loudness information.

Bo N Schenkman1, Mats E Nilsson.   

Abstract

Blind persons emit sounds to detect objects by echolocation. Both perceived pitch and perceived loudness of the emitted sound change as they fuse with the reflections from nearby objects. Blind persons generally are better than sighted at echolocation, but it is unclear whether this superiority is related to detection of pitch, loudness, or both. We measured the ability of twelve blind and twenty-five sighted listeners to determine which of two sounds, 500 ms noise bursts, that had been recorded in the presence of a reflecting object in a room with reflecting walls using an artificial head. The sound pairs were original recordings differing in both pitch and loudness, or manipulated recordings with either the pitch or the loudness information removed. Observers responded using a 2AFC method with verbal feedback. For both blind and sighted listeners the performance declined more with the pitch information removed than with the loudness information removed. In addition, the blind performed clearly better than the sighted as long as the pitch information was present, but not when it was removed. Taken together, these results show that the ability to detect pitch is a main factor underlying high performance in human echolocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22128556     DOI: 10.1068/p6898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  13 in total

1.  Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Correlation between vividness of visual imagery and echolocation ability in sighted, echo-naïve people.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Rosanna C Wilson; Bethany K Gee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensory substitution information informs locomotor adjustments when walking through apertures.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Matthew A Timmis; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensorimotor strategies for recognizing geometrical shapes: a comparative study with different sensory substitution devices.

Authors:  Fernando Bermejo; Ezequiel A Di Paolo; Mercedes X Hüg; Claudia Arias
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-09

Review 5.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Auditory Spatial Perception without Vision.

Authors:  Patrice Voss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-20

7.  Blindness enhances auditory obstacle circumvention: Assessing echolocation, sensory substitution, and visual-based navigation.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Human Echolocation for Target Detection Is More Accurate With Emissions Containing Higher Spectral Frequencies, and This Is Explained by Echo Intensity.

Authors:  L J Norman; L Thaler
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-05-22

9.  Depth Echolocation Learnt by Novice Sighted People.

Authors:  Alessia Tonelli; Luca Brayda; Monica Gori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Echobot: An automated system for stimulus presentation in studies of human echolocation.

Authors:  Carlos Tirado; Peter Lundén; Mats E Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.