Literature DB >> 15982388

Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue.

Jean-Paul Delille1, Priscilla J Slanetz, Eren D Yeh, Daniel B Kopans, Leoncio Garrido.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the best time during the menstrual cycle to perform dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The contralateral "normal" breast of 50 premenopausal women (mean age 40.4 +/- 6.4 years, range 30--52 years) were enrolled in a protocol designed to correlate an ipsilateral suspicious breast lesion with pathology. The contralateral breast in each patient was examined with palpation and mammography prior to MRI on a 1.5 T scanner using gradient echo and dynamic contrast-enhanced echo-planar without and following gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) injection. Pre-contrast T1 relaxation times were measured before calculating extraction flow product (EFP) maps using a multicompartmental model. T1, EFP, and enhancement were measured in the control breast on four slices centered around the nipple and recorded as a function of the phases of the menstrual cycle. Lesions or areas with focal enhancement were excluded. Analysis of variance and Fisher's tests were performed. The cyclic changes in T1 relaxation time were not significant (p>0.2). EFP and enhancement varied significantly during the cycle (p<0.003 and p<0.004, respectively), with low values during the first half of the cycle and high values during the second half. The lowest values of EFP and enhancement (5.5+/-2.9 ml/100 g/min and 26+/-17%) were observed during the proliferative phase (days 3--7), and the highest values (17+/-10.2 ml/100 g/min and 104+/-28%) were observed during the secretory phase (days 21-27) (p<0.0006 and p<0.0008, respectively). Dynamic breast MRI should be performed during first half of the menstrual cycle (days 3--14) in order to minimize interpretative difficulties related to the uptake of gadolinium in normal breast tissue due to hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982388     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21499.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  48 in total

1.  Contrast enhancement kinetics of normal breast parenchyma in dynamic MR mammography: effects of menopausal status, oral contraceptives, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.

Authors:  Katrin Hegenscheid; Carsten O Schmidt; Rebecca Seipel; René Laqua; Ralf Ohlinger; Norbert Hosten; Ralf Puls
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation of the kinetic properties of background parenchymal enhancement throughout the phases of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Alana R Amarosa; Jason McKellop; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Melanie Moccaldi; Tess V Clendenen; James S Babb; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Linda Moy; Sungheon Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in breast density measured by using three-dimensional MR imaging.

Authors:  Siwa Chan; Min-Ying L Su; Fu-Ju Lei; Jia-Pei Wu; Muqing Lin; Orhan Nalcioglu; Stephen A Feig; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Role of DCE-MR in predicting breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Marco Macchini; Martina Ponziani; Andrea Prochowski Iamurri; Mirco Pistelli; Mariagrazia De Lisa; Rossana Berardi; Gian Marco Giuseppetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Three-dimensional MR Fingerprinting for Quantitative Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Ananya Panda; Shivani Pahwa; Jesse I Hamilton; Sara Dastmalchian; Debra F McGivney; Dan Ma; Joshua Batesole; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark A Griswold; Donna Plecha; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diffusion weighted imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and variation with menstrual cycle and menopausal status.

Authors:  Elizabeth A M O'Flynn; Veronica A Morgan; Sharon L Giles; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Repeatability and reproducibility of 3D MR fingerprinting relaxometry measurements in normal breast tissue.

Authors:  Ananya Panda; Yong Chen; Kathleen Ropella-Panagis; Satyam Ghodasara; Marcie Stopchinski; Nicole Seyfried; Katherine Wright; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark Griswold; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging.

Authors:  Julie Sogani; Elizabeth A Morris; Jennifer B Kaplan; Donna D'Alessio; Debra Goldman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography.

Authors:  R Cubuk; N Tasali; B Narin; F Keskiner; L Celik; S Guney
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  High-background parenchymal enhancement in the contralateral breast is an imaging biomarker for favorable prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chuanhui Xu; Jinhui Yu; Feifei Wu; Xuemei Li; Dongmin Hu; Guiming Chen; Gang Wu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.