Literature DB >> 24370071

Patient preferences for testing for pulmonary embolism in the ED using a shared decision-making model.

Brian C Geyer1, Maria Xu2, Christopher Kabrhel3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process whereby patients and clinicians work together to make informed medical decisions that incorporate patient values. Recent data suggest that, for patients with low pretest probability of pulmonary embolism (PE), doubling the standard d-dimer cutoff may reduce the need for imaging with minimal increase in missed PE diagnoses. We used an SDM approach to determine patient preferences regarding this diagnostic approach.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled a consecutive sample of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with chest pain or dyspnea. We provided patients with a standardized description of the diagnostic workup for PE. We also provided image arrays describing the risks of computed tomography in low pretest probability patients and the risks of deferring imaging assuming a d-dimer was less than twice the value normally considered positive. We surveyed patients for their preference to undergo or defer imaging in this scenario.
RESULTS: We enrolled 203 ED patients. Mean age was 55 ± 17 years, and 61% were male. Seventy-four patients (37%) elected to defer computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries testing. Patients with a previous PE diagnosis were less likely to defer computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries testing (P = .007). There was no association between the decision to defer testing and age, sex, family history of PE, or self-assessed risk-taking tendency.
CONCLUSIONS: When presented with a hypothetical scenario, more than one-third of patients deferred imaging for PE based on low clinical probability and a d-dimer less than twice the normal threshold. An SDM approach is acceptable to patients and may decrease imaging for PE.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24370071     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  4 in total

1.  The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, "Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda" Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report.

Authors:  Tyler W Barrett; Kristin L Rising; M Fernanda Bellolio; M Kennedy Hall; Aaron Brody; Kenneth W Dodd; Mira Grieser; Phillip D Levy; Ali S Raja; Wesley H Self; Gail Weingarten; Erik P Hess; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.

Authors:  Edward R Melnick; Marc A Probst; Elizabeth Schoenfeld; Sean P Collins; Maggie Breslin; Cheryl Walsh; Nathan Kuppermann; Pat Dunn; Benjamin S Abella; Dowin Boatright; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines.

Authors:  Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Yuan Zhang; Francesca Brundisini; Ivan D Florez; Wojtek Wiercioch; Robby Nieuwlaat; Housne Begum; Carlos A Cuello; Yetiani Roldan; Ru Chen; Chengyi Ding; Rebecca L Morgan; John J Riva; Yuqing Zhang; Rana Charide; Arnav Agarwal; Sara Balduzzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Yasir Rehman; Ignacio Neumann; Nicole Schwab; Tejan Baldeh; Cody Braun; María Francisca Rodríguez; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-03-10

Review 4.  Addressing overuse in emergency medicine: evidence of a role for greater patient engagement.

Authors:  Erika H Newton
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.