Literature DB >> 24369993

Benchmarking organic micropollutants in wastewater, recycled water and drinking water with in vitro bioassays.

Beate I Escher1, Mayumi Allinson, Rolf Altenburger, Peter A Bain, Patrick Balaguer, Wibke Busch, Jordan Crago, Nancy D Denslow, Elke Dopp, Klara Hilscherova, Andrew R Humpage, Anu Kumar, Marina Grimaldi, B Sumith Jayasinghe, Barbora Jarosova, Ai Jia, Sergei Makarov, Keith A Maruya, Alex Medvedev, Alvine C Mehinto, Jamie E Mendez, Anita Poulsen, Erik Prochazka, Jessica Richard, Andrea Schifferli, Daniel Schlenk, Stefan Scholz, Fujio Shiraishi, Shane Snyder, Guanyong Su, Janet Y M Tang, Bart van der Burg, Sander C van der Linden, Inge Werner, Sandy D Westerheide, Chris K C Wong, Min Yang, Bonnie H Y Yeung, Xiaowei Zhang, Frederic D L Leusch.   

Abstract

Thousands of organic micropollutants and their transformation products occur in water. Although often present at low concentrations, individual compounds contribute to mixture effects. Cell-based bioassays that target health-relevant biological endpoints may therefore complement chemical analysis for water quality assessment. The objective of this study was to evaluate cell-based bioassays for their suitability to benchmark water quality and to assess efficacy of water treatment processes. The selected bioassays cover relevant steps in the toxicity pathways including induction of xenobiotic metabolism, specific and reactive modes of toxic action, activation of adaptive stress response pathways and system responses. Twenty laboratories applied 103 unique in vitro bioassays to a common set of 10 water samples collected in Australia, including wastewater treatment plant effluent, two types of recycled water (reverse osmosis and ozonation/activated carbon filtration), stormwater, surface water, and drinking water. Sixty-five bioassays (63%) showed positive results in at least one sample, typically in wastewater treatment plant effluent, and only five (5%) were positive in the control (ultrapure water). Each water type had a characteristic bioanalytical profile with particular groups of toxicity pathways either consistently responsive or not responsive across test systems. The most responsive health-relevant endpoints were related to xenobiotic metabolism (pregnane X and aryl hydrocarbon receptors), hormone-mediated modes of action (mainly related to the estrogen, glucocorticoid, and antiandrogen activities), reactive modes of action (genotoxicity) and adaptive stress response pathway (oxidative stress response). This study has demonstrated that selected cell-based bioassays are suitable to benchmark water quality and it is recommended to use a purpose-tailored panel of bioassays for routine monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24369993     DOI: 10.1021/es403899t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  46 in total

Review 1.  From the exposome to mechanistic understanding of chemical-induced adverse effects.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Jörg Hackermüller; Tobias Polte; Stefan Scholz; Achim Aigner; Rolf Altenburger; Alexander Böhme; Stephanie K Bopp; Werner Brack; Wibke Busch; Marc Chadeau-Hyam; Adrian Covaci; Adolf Eisenträger; James J Galligan; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Thomas Hartung; Michaela Hein; Gunda Herberth; Annika Jahnke; Jos Kleinjans; Nils Klüver; Martin Krauss; Marja Lamoree; Irina Lehmann; Till Luckenbach; Gary W Miller; Andrea Müller; David H Phillips; Thorsten Reemtsma; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Gerrit Schüürmann; Benno Schwikowski; Yu-Mei Tan; Saskia Trump; Susanne Walter-Rohde; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Current limitations and recommendations to improve testing for the environmental assessment of endocrine active substances.

Authors:  Katherine K Coady; Ronald C Biever; Nancy D Denslow; Melanie Gross; Patrick D Guiney; Henrik Holbech; Natalie K Karouna-Renier; Ioanna Katsiadaki; Hank Krueger; Steven L Levine; Gerd Maack; Mike Williams; Jeffrey C Wolf; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  An integrated approach for identifying priority contaminant in the Great Lakes Basin - Investigations in the Lower Green Bay/Fox River and Milwaukee Estuary areas of concern.

Authors:  Shibin Li; Daniel L Villeneuve; Jason P Berninger; Brett R Blackwell; Jenna E Cavallin; Megan N Hughes; Kathleen M Jensen; Zachary Jorgenson; Michael D Kahl; Anthony L Schroeder; Kyle E Stevens; Linnea M Thomas; Matthew A Weberg; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Rapid in situ toxicity testing with luminescent bacteria Photorhabdus luminescens and Vibrio fischeri adapted to a small portable luminometer.

Authors:  Petr Masner; Barbora Javůrková; Luděk Bláha
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The advantages of linear concentration-response curves for in vitro bioassays with environmental samples.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Peta A Neale; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Screening for Endocrine Activity in Water Using Commercially-available In Vitro Transactivation Bioassays.

Authors:  Alvine C Mehinto; B Sumith Jayasinghe; Darcy R Vandervort; Nancy D Denslow; Keith A Maruya
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Risk Characterization of Environmental Samples Using In Vitro Bioactivity and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations Data.

Authors:  Zunwei Chen; Dillon Lloyd; Yi-Hui Zhou; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Impact of Hurricane Maria on Drinking Water Quality in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Yishan Lin; Maria Sevillano-Rivera; Tao Jiang; Guangyu Li; Irmarie Cotto; Solize Vosloo; Corey M G Carpenter; Philip Larese-Casanova; Roger W Giese; Damian E Helbling; Ingrid Y Padilla; Zaira Rosario-Pabón; Carmen Vélez Vega; José F Cordero; Akram N Alshawabkeh; Ameet Pinto; April Z Gu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  An in-vitro approach for water quality determination: activation of NF-κB as marker for cancer-related stress responses induced by anthropogenic pollutants of drinking water.

Authors:  Luis F Spitta; Sebastian Diegeler; Christa Baumstark-Khan; Christine E Hellweg
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Channel Interactions and Robust Inference for Ratiometric β-lactamase Assay Data: a Tox21 Library Analysis.

Authors:  Fjodor Melnikov; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Nisha S Sipes; Paul T Anastas
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 8.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.