Karen Albright1, Alison Saville2, Steven Lockhart3, Katina Widmer Racich3, Brenda Beaty2, Allison Kempe4. 1. Children's Outcomes Research Program, The Children's Hospital, Denver, Colo; Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo; Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo. Electronic address: Karen.Albright@ucdenver.edu. 2. Children's Outcomes Research Program, The Children's Hospital, Denver, Colo; Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo. 3. Children's Outcomes Research Program, The Children's Hospital, Denver, Colo. 4. Children's Outcomes Research Program, The Children's Hospital, Denver, Colo; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess primary care providers' current reminder/recall practices, preferences for collaboration with health departments in reminder/recall efforts, attitudes toward practice-based and population-based reminder/recall, and experiences with a population-based reminder/recall intervention. METHODS: Providers responsible for making decisions about immunization delivery at all primary care practices that participate in the Colorado Immunization Information System were surveyed. Data collection was preceded by an intervention in which half of 14 counties received a population-based reminder/recall intervention conducted by the health department. Practice staff involved in immunization activities were then selected for semistructured telephone interviews that were based on the location of their practice within specified strata, including whether they were in the intervention counties, urban/rural location, and practice type. RESULTS: A total of 282 (73.6%) of 383 of providers responded to the survey, and 253 who administered vaccines to children 19 to 35 months were retained; 82 staff members at 36 practices were interviewed. Providers' preferences for who should conduct reminder/recall were almost evenly split, with slightly more indicating that it should be conducted by the health department. Cost and feasibility issues were perceived barriers to conducting practice-based recall, particularly among urban practices. Support for population-based reminder/recall was highest among rural practices. Concern about perceived inaccuracies in immunization registry data was the major barrier to conducting population-based reminder/recall. The population-based intervention did not create an undue burden on practices. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative approach to reminder/recall involving both providers and health departments is preferable for many providers and may be a viable solution to the barriers of practice-based reminder/recall.
OBJECTIVE: To assess primary care providers' current reminder/recall practices, preferences for collaboration with health departments in reminder/recall efforts, attitudes toward practice-based and population-based reminder/recall, and experiences with a population-based reminder/recall intervention. METHODS: Providers responsible for making decisions about immunization delivery at all primary care practices that participate in the Colorado Immunization Information System were surveyed. Data collection was preceded by an intervention in which half of 14 counties received a population-based reminder/recall intervention conducted by the health department. Practice staff involved in immunization activities were then selected for semistructured telephone interviews that were based on the location of their practice within specified strata, including whether they were in the intervention counties, urban/rural location, and practice type. RESULTS: A total of 282 (73.6%) of 383 of providers responded to the survey, and 253 who administered vaccines to children 19 to 35 months were retained; 82 staff members at 36 practices were interviewed. Providers' preferences for who should conduct reminder/recall were almost evenly split, with slightly more indicating that it should be conducted by the health department. Cost and feasibility issues were perceived barriers to conducting practice-based recall, particularly among urban practices. Support for population-based reminder/recall was highest among rural practices. Concern about perceived inaccuracies in immunization registry data was the major barrier to conducting population-based reminder/recall. The population-based intervention did not create an undue burden on practices. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative approach to reminder/recall involving both providers and health departments is preferable for many providers and may be a viable solution to the barriers of practice-based reminder/recall.
Authors: Cheryl D Tierney; Hussain Yusuf; Shawn R McMahon; Donna Rusinak; Megan A O' Brien; Mehran S Massoudi; Tracy A Lieu Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Allison Kempe; Matthew F Daley; Jennifer Barrow; Norma Allred; Nellie Hester; Brenda L Beaty; Lori A Crane; Kellyn Pearson; Stephen Berman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Matthew F Daley; Jennifer Barrow; Kellyn Pearson; Lori A Crane; Dexiang Gao; John M Stevenson; Stephen Berman; Allison Kempe Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Peter Szilagyi; Christina Albertin; Dennis Gurfinkel; Brenda Beaty; Xinkai Zhou; Sitaram Vangala; John Rice; Jonathan D Campbell; Melanie D Whittington; Rebecca Valderrama; Abigail Breck; Heather Roth; Megan Meldrum; Chi-Hong Tseng; Cynthia Rand; Sharon G Humiston; Stanley Schaffer; Allison Kempe Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: William A Calo; Melissa B Gilkey; Jennifer Leeman; Jennifer Heisler-MacKinnon; Chrystal Averette; Stephanie Sanchez; Melanie L Kornides; Noel T Brewer Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Ruta Valaitis; Donna Meagher-Stewart; Ruth Martin-Misener; Sabrina T Wong; Marjorie MacDonald; Linda O'Mara Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Alison W Saville; Dennis Gurfinkel; Brenda L Beaty; Alison E Chi; Amanda Dayton; Laura Hurley; Krithika Suresh; Allison Kempe Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2020-12-29