Literature DB >> 24368486

Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.

Patrick A Nosti1, Uduak Umoh Andy, Sarah Kane, Dena E White, Heidi S Harvie, Lior Lowenstein, Robert E Gutman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative and postoperative surgical outcomes between and among open and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies (MISCs).
METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study comparing abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) and MISC from January 1999 to December 2010.
RESULTS: A total of 1124 subjects underwent sacrocolpopexy, with 589 ASCs and 535 MISCs. Within the MISC group, 273 were laparoscopic (LSC) and 262 were robotic (RSC). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy was associated with greater overall complication rate compared with MISC (20.0% vs 12.7%; P = 0.001). After controlling for difference in length of follow-up, there was no significant difference in the rate of anatomical failure between the ASC and MISC groups. The MISC group had shorter hospitalization, less blood loss, but longer operative times compared with the ASC group. When comparing LSC to RSC, there was no difference in anatomic failures (7.7% vs 6.9%; P = 0.74). However, LSC was associated with more complications compared with RSC (18% vs 7%; P < 0.02). In addition, LSC had higher blood loss, less operative time, and shorter hospital stay compared with RSC.
CONCLUSION: Although anatomic results are similar, ASC is associated with a higher rate of complications compared with MISC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24368486     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  12 in total

Review 1.  Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maribel De Gouveia De Sa; Leica Sarah Claydon; Barry Whitlow; Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Pelvic Prolapse Repair in the Era of Mesh.

Authors:  Natalie Gaines; Priyanka Gupta; Larry T Sirls
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Alexandriah N Alas; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal Elevate™ mesh.

Authors:  Valérie To; Pattaya Hengrasmee; Alan Lam; Georgina Luscombe; Anna Lawless; Justin Lam
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maribel De Gouveia De Sa; Leica Sarah Claydon; Barry Whitlow; Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Comparison of strength of sacrocolpopexy mesh attachment using barbed and nonbarbed sutures.

Authors:  Marjorie L Pilkinton; Gregory C Levine; Laura Bennett; Harvey A Winkler; Dara F Shalom; Peter S Finamore
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  A Novel Operative Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Utilizing a MRI-Visible Mesh Implant: Safety and Outcome of Modified Laparoscopic Bilateral Sacropexy.

Authors:  Ralf Joukhadar; Gabriele Meyberg-Solomayer; Amr Hamza; Julia Radosa; Werner Bader; Dimitri Barski; Fakher Ismaeel; Guenther Schneider; Erich Solomayer; Sascha Baum
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Current surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: Strategies for the improvement of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Kwang Jin Ko; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.