Literature DB >> 24368138

Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.

Pranesh Bhargava1, Etienne Gaudrain2, Deniz Başkent3.   

Abstract

In noisy listening conditions, intelligibility of degraded speech can be enhanced by top-down restoration. Cochlear implant (CI) users have difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments. This could partially be due to reduced top-down restoration of speech, which may be related to the changes that the electrical stimulation imposes on the bottom-up cues. We tested this hypothesis using the phonemic restoration (PhR) paradigm in which speech interrupted with periodic silent intervals is perceived illusorily continuous (continuity illusion or CoI) and becomes more intelligible (PhR benefit) when the interruptions are filled with noise bursts. Using meaningful sentences, both CoI and PhR benefit were measured in CI users, and compared with those of normal-hearing (NH) listeners presented with normal speech and 8-channel noise-band vocoded speech, acoustically simulating CIs. CI users showed different patterns in both PhR benefit and CoI, compared to NH results with or without the noise-band vocoding. However, they were able to use top-down restoration under certain test conditions. This observation supports the idea that changes in bottom-up cues can impose changes to the top-down processes needed to enhance intelligibility of degraded speech. The knowledge that CI users seem to be able to do restoration under the right circumstances could be exploited in patient rehabilitation and product development.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24368138     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  20 in total

Review 1.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.

Authors:  Christian Stilp; Gail Donaldson; Soohee Oh; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Gail Donaldson; Ala Somarowthu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Expert violinists can't tell old from new.

Authors:  Daniel J Levitin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Linguistic Context Versus Semantic Competition in Word Recognition by Younger and Older Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Nicole M Amichetti; Eriko Atagi; Ying-Yee Kong; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Age effects on perceptual restoration of degraded interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jameson K Mattingly; Irina Castellanos; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Impact of peripheral hearing loss on top-down auditory processing.

Authors:  Alexandria M H Lesicko; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Christin Ray; Kara J Vasil; David B Pisoni; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.