Literature DB >> 24367105

Cortical neural populations can guide behavior by integrating inputs linearly, independent of synchrony.

Mark H Histed1, John H R Maunsell.   

Abstract

Neurons are sensitive to the relative timing of inputs, both because several inputs must coincide to reach spike threshold and because active dendritic mechanisms can amplify synchronous inputs. To determine if input synchrony can influence behavior, we trained mice to report activation of excitatory neurons in visual cortex using channelrhodopsin-2. We used light pulses that varied in duration from a few milliseconds to 100 ms and measured neuronal responses and animals' detection ability. We found detection performance was well predicted by the total amount of light delivered. Short pulses provided no behavioral advantage, even when they concentrated evoked spikes into an interval a few milliseconds long. Arranging pulses into trains of varying frequency from beta to gamma also produced no behavioral advantage. Light intensities required to drive behavior were low (at low intensities, channelrhodopsin-2 conductance varies linearly with intensity), and the accompanying changes in firing rate were small (over 100 ms, average change: 1.1 spikes per s). Firing rate changes varied linearly with pulse intensity and duration, and behavior was predicted by total spike count independent of temporal arrangement. Thus, animals' detection performance reflected the linear integration of total input over 100 ms. This behavioral linearity despite neurons' nonlinearities can be explained by a population code using noisy neurons. Ongoing background activity creates probabilistic spiking, allowing weak inputs to change spike probability linearly, with little amplification of coincident input. Summing across a population then yields a total spike count that weights inputs equally, regardless of their arrival time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mouse; neuronal circuits; optogenetics; population coding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24367105      PMCID: PMC3890892          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318750111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  66 in total

1.  Behavioral detection of electrical microstimulation in different cortical visual areas.

Authors:  Dona K Murphey; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Topology and dynamics of the canonical circuit of cat V1.

Authors:  T Binzegger; R J Douglas; K A C Martin
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2009-07-18

3.  Strength and orientation tuning of the thalamic input to simple cells revealed by electrically evoked cortical suppression.

Authors:  S Chung; D Ferster
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Modeling study of the light stimulation of a neuron cell with channelrhodopsin-2 mutants.

Authors:  Nir Grossman; Konstantin Nikolic; Christofer Toumazou; Patrick Degenaar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis.

Authors:  D Y Ts'o; C D Gilbert; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Direct activation of sparse, distributed populations of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Vincent Bonin; R Clay Reid
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses.

Authors:  Jessica A Cardin; Marie Carlén; Konstantinos Meletis; Ulf Knoblich; Feng Zhang; Karl Deisseroth; Li-Huei Tsai; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making.

Authors:  Bingni W Brunton; Matthew M Botvinick; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel.

Authors:  Georg Nagel; Tanjef Szellas; Wolfram Huhn; Suneel Kateriya; Nona Adeishvili; Peter Berthold; Doris Ollig; Peter Hegemann; Ernst Bamberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Feature-based attention enhances performance by increasing response gain.

Authors:  Katrin Herrmann; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  36 in total

1.  Inhibition stabilization is a widespread property of cortical networks.

Authors:  Alessandro Sanzeni; Bradley Akitake; Hannah C Goldbach; Caitlin E Leedy; Nicolas Brunel; Mark H Histed
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  GettING in Touch With What Drives Your Inner Funky: Sources of CA1 Gamma Oscillations.

Authors:  Tim A Benke
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.500

3.  Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Gregg A Tabot; Robert A Gaunt; Francesco V Tenore; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  What single-cell stimulation has told us about neural coding.

Authors:  Guy Doron; Michael Brecht
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Properties of precise firing synchrony between synaptically coupled cortical interneurons depend on their mode of coupling.

Authors:  Hang Hu; Ariel Agmon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Cracking the Neural Code for Sensory Perception by Combining Statistics, Intervention, and Behavior.

Authors:  Stefano Panzeri; Christopher D Harvey; Eugenio Piasini; Peter E Latham; Tommaso Fellin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Beyond the connectome: the dynome.

Authors:  Nancy J Kopell; Howard J Gritton; Miles A Whittington; Mark A Kramer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  A New, High-Efficacy, Noninvasive Transcranial Electric Stimulation Tuned to Local Neurodynamics.

Authors:  Carlo Cottone; Andrea Cancelli; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Camillo Porcaro; Carlo Salustri; Franca Tecchio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Representation of memories in the cortical-hippocampal system: Results from the application of population similarity analyses.

Authors:  Sam McKenzie; Christopher S Keene; Anja Farovik; John Bladon; Ryan Place; Robert Komorowski; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Mice Preferentially Use Increases in Cerebral Cortex Spiking to Detect Changes in Visual Stimuli.

Authors:  Jackson J Cone; Morgan L Bade; Nicolas Y Masse; Elizabeth A Page; David J Freedman; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.