Literature DB >> 24366723

Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy.

P-G Guinot1, B de Broca, E Bernard, O Abou Arab, E Lorne, H Dupont.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the ability of the stroke volume respiratory variation (ΔrespSV) determined by oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM) to predict the response to volume expansion (VE) during pneumoperitoneum. The predictive value of ΔrespSV was evaluated according to the concept of the 'grey zone'.
METHODS: Patients operated on laparoscopy and monitored by ODM were prospectively included. The exclusion criteria were frequent ectopic beats or preoperative arrhythmia, right ventricular failure, and spontaneous breathing. Haemodynamic parameters and oesophageal Doppler indices [stroke volume (SV), peak velocity (PV), cardiac output (CO), corrected flow time (FTc), respiratory variation of PV (ΔrespPV) and SV (ΔrespSV)] were collected before and after VE. Responders were defined as a ≥15% increase in SV after VE.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight (64%) of the 59 patients were responders. A cut-off of >14% ΔrespSV predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.98, P<0.0001]. The grey zone of ΔrespSV ranged between 13 and 15%. With an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56-0.83, P=0.005), ΔrespPV fairly accurately predicted fluid responsiveness. FTc was unable to accurately predict fluid responsiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: ΔrespSV and ΔrespPV predicted fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy under strict physiological conditions. FTc was not predictive of fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler, intraoperative; anaesthesia; laparoscopy; monitoring; stroke volume

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24366723     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

1.  Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Marko Zlicar; Vesna Novak-Jankovic; Rok Blagus; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Cardiac stroke volume variability measured non-invasively by three methods for detection of central hypovolemia in healthy humans.

Authors:  Nathalie Linn Anikken Holme; Erling Bekkestad Rein; Maja Elstad
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Dynamic arterial elastance as a predictor of arterial pressure response to fluid administration: a validation study.

Authors:  Manuel Ignacio Monge García; Manuel Gracia Romero; Anselmo Gil Cano; Hollmann D Aya; Andrew Rhodes; Robert Michael Grounds; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Toscani; Hollmann D Aya; Dimitra Antonakaki; Davide Bastoni; Ximena Watson; Nish Arulkumaran; Andrew Rhodes; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Changes in dynamic arterial elastance induced by volume expansion and vasopressor in the operating room: a prospective bicentre study.

Authors:  Hugues de Courson; Philippe Boyer; Romain Grobost; Romain Lanchon; Musa Sesay; Karine Nouette-Gaulain; Emmanuel Futier; Matthieu Biais
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Jun; Rack Kyung Chung; Hee Jung Baik; Mi Hwa Chung; Joon-Sang Hyeon; Young-Goo Lee; Sung-Ho Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jaap Jan Vos; Marieke Poterman; Pieternel Papineau Salm; Kai Van Amsterdam; Michel M R F Struys; Thomas W L Scheeren; Alain F Kalmar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Stroke volume changes induced by a recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in patients with protective ventilation in the operating theater.

Authors:  Bruno De Broca; Jeremie Garnier; Marc-Olivier Fischer; Thomas Archange; Julien Marc; Osama Abou-Arab; Hervé Dupont; Emmanuel Lorne; Pierre-Grégoire Guinot
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative  (POQI) joint consensus statement on perioperative fluid management within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Robert H Thiele; Karthik Raghunathan; C S Brudney; Dileep N Lobo; Daniel Martin; Anthony Senagore; Maxime Cannesson; Tong Joo Gan; Michael Monty G Mythen; Andrew D Shaw; Timothy E Miller
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-09-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.