OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that low bispectral index scores and low sedative requirements during therapeutic hypothermia predict poor neurologic outcome. DESIGN: Observational study of a prospectively collected cohort. SETTING: Cardiovascular ICU. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty consecutive cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Eighty-four of the 141 subjects (60%) who survived hypothermia induction were discharged from the ICU with poor neurologic outcome, defined as a cerebral performance category score of 3, 4, or 5. These subjects had lower bispectral index (p < 0.001) and sedative requirements (p < 0.001) during hypothermia compared with the 57 subjects discharged with good outcome. Early prediction of neurologic recovery was best 7 hours after ICU admission, and median bispectral index scores at that time were 31 points lower in subjects discharged with poor outcome (11 [interquartile range, 4-29] vs 42 [37-49], p < 0.001). Median sedation requirements decreased by 17% (interquartile range, -50 to 0%) 7 hours after ICU admission in subjects with poor outcome but increased by 50% (interquartile range, 0-142%) in subjects with good outcome (p < 0.001). Each 10-point decrease in bispectral index was independently associated with a 59% increase in the odds of poor outcome (95% CI, 32-76%; p < 0.001). The model including bispectral index and sedative requirement correctly reclassified 15% of subjects from good to poor outcome and 1% of subjects from poor to good outcome. The model incorrectly reclassified 1% of subjects from poor to good outcome but did not incorrectly reclassify any from good to poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Bispectral index scores and sedative requirements early in the course of therapeutic hypothermia improve the identification of patients who will not recover from brain anoxia. The ability to accurately predict nonrecovery after cardiac arrest could facilitate discussions with families, reduce patient suffering, and limit use of ICU resources in futile cases.
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that low bispectral index scores and low sedative requirements during therapeutic hypothermia predict poor neurologic outcome. DESIGN: Observational study of a prospectively collected cohort. SETTING:Cardiovascular ICU. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty consecutive cardiac arrestpatients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Eighty-four of the 141 subjects (60%) who survived hypothermia induction were discharged from the ICU with poor neurologic outcome, defined as a cerebral performance category score of 3, 4, or 5. These subjects had lower bispectral index (p < 0.001) and sedative requirements (p < 0.001) during hypothermia compared with the 57 subjects discharged with good outcome. Early prediction of neurologic recovery was best 7 hours after ICU admission, and median bispectral index scores at that time were 31 points lower in subjects discharged with poor outcome (11 [interquartile range, 4-29] vs 42 [37-49], p < 0.001). Median sedation requirements decreased by 17% (interquartile range, -50 to 0%) 7 hours after ICU admission in subjects with poor outcome but increased by 50% (interquartile range, 0-142%) in subjects with good outcome (p < 0.001). Each 10-point decrease in bispectral index was independently associated with a 59% increase in the odds of poor outcome (95% CI, 32-76%; p < 0.001). The model including bispectral index and sedative requirement correctly reclassified 15% of subjects from good to poor outcome and 1% of subjects from poor to good outcome. The model incorrectly reclassified 1% of subjects from poor to good outcome but did not incorrectly reclassify any from good to poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Bispectral index scores and sedative requirements early in the course of therapeutic hypothermia improve the identification of patients who will not recover from brain anoxia. The ability to accurately predict nonrecovery after cardiac arrest could facilitate discussions with families, reduce patient suffering, and limit use of ICU resources in futile cases.
Authors: J Garnacho-Montero; J Madrazo-Osuna; J L García-Garmendia; C Ortiz-Leyba; F J Jiménez-Jiménez; A Barrero-Almodóvar; M C Garnacho-Montero; M R Moyano-Del-Estad Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ian Jacobs; Vinay Nadkarni; Jan Bahr; Robert A Berg; John E Billi; Leo Bossaert; Pascal Cassan; Ashraf Coovadia; Kate D'Este; Judith Finn; Henry Halperin; Anthony Handley; Johan Herlitz; Robert Hickey; Ahamed Idris; Walter Kloeck; Gregory Luke Larkin; Mary Elizabeth Mancini; Pip Mason; Gregory Mears; Koenraad Monsieurs; William Montgomery; Peter Morley; Graham Nichol; Jerry Nolan; Kazuo Okada; Jeffrey Perlman; Michael Shuster; Petter Andreas Steen; Fritz Sterz; James Tibballs; Sergio Timerman; Tanya Truitt; David Zideman Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Stephen A Bernard; Timothy W Gray; Michael D Buist; Bruce M Jones; William Silvester; Geoff Gutteridge; Karen Smith Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Neeraj Badjatia; Robert G Kowalski; J Michael Schmidt; Marc E Voorhees; Jan Claassen; Noeleen D Ostapkovich; Mary Presciutti; E Sander Connolly; David Palestrant; Augusto Parra; Stephan A Mayer Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Melika Hosseini; Robert H Wilson; Christian Crouzet; Arya Amirhekmat; Kevin S Wei; Yama Akbari Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Ward Eertmans; Cornelia Genbrugge; Gilles Haesevoets; Jo Dens; Willem Boer; Frank Jans; Cathy De Deyne Journal: Crit Care Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Ward Eertmans; Cornelia Genbrugge; Margot Vander Laenen; Willem Boer; Dieter Mesotten; Jo Dens; Frank Jans; Cathy De Deyne Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 6.925