Ruizhi Li1, Scott L Diamond2. 1. Institute for Medicine and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 1024 Vagelos Research Laboratories, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. 2. Institute for Medicine and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 1024 Vagelos Research Laboratories, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: sld@seas.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microfluidic devices recreate the hemodynamic conditions of thrombosis. METHODS: Whole blood inhibited with PPACK was treated ex vivo with inhibitors and perfused over collagen for 300 s (wall shear rate=200 s(-1)) using a microfluidic flow assay. Platelet accumulation was measured in the presence of COX-1 inhibitor (aspirin, ASA), P2Y₁ inhibitor (MRS 2179), P2Y₁₂ inhibitor (2MeSAMP) or combined P2Y1 and P2Y₁₂ inhibitors. RESULTS: High dose ASA (500 μM), 2MeSAMP (100 μM), MRS 2179 (10 μM), or combined 2MeSAMP and MRS 2179 decreased total platelet accumulation by 27.5%, 75.6%, 77.7%, and 87.9% (p<0.01), respectively. ASA reduced secondary aggregation rate between 150 and 300 s without effect on primary deposition rate on collagen from 60 to 150 s. In contrast, 2MeSAMP and MRS 2179 acted earlier and reduced primary deposition to collagen between 60 and 105 s and secondary aggregation between 105 and 300 s. R(COX) and R(P2Y) (defined as a ratio of secondary aggregation rate to primary deposition rate) demonstrated 9 of 10 subjects had R(COX)<1 or R(P2Y)<1 following ASA or 2MeSAMP addition, while 6 of 10 subjects had R(P2Y)<1 following MRS 2179 addition. Combined MRS 2179 and 2MeSAMP inhibited primary platelet deposition rate and platelet secondary aggregation beyond that of each individual inhibitor. Receiver-Operator Characteristic area under the curve (AUC) indicated the robustness of R(COX) and R(P2Y) to detect inhibition of secondary platelet aggregation by ASA, 2MeSAMP, and MRS 2179 (AUC of 0.874 0.966, and 0.889, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Microfluidic devices can detect platelet sensitivity to antiplatelet agents. The R-value can serve as a self-normalized metric of platelet function for a single blood sample.
BACKGROUND: Microfluidic devices recreate the hemodynamic conditions of thrombosis. METHODS: Whole blood inhibited with PPACK was treated ex vivo with inhibitors and perfused over collagen for 300 s (wall shear rate=200 s(-1)) using a microfluidic flow assay. Platelet accumulation was measured in the presence of COX-1 inhibitor (aspirin, ASA), P2Y₁ inhibitor (MRS 2179), P2Y₁₂ inhibitor (2MeSAMP) or combined P2Y1 and P2Y₁₂ inhibitors. RESULTS: High dose ASA (500 μM), 2MeSAMP (100 μM), MRS 2179 (10 μM), or combined 2MeSAMP and MRS 2179 decreased total platelet accumulation by 27.5%, 75.6%, 77.7%, and 87.9% (p<0.01), respectively. ASA reduced secondary aggregation rate between 150 and 300 s without effect on primary deposition rate on collagen from 60 to 150 s. In contrast, 2MeSAMP and MRS 2179 acted earlier and reduced primary deposition to collagen between 60 and 105 s and secondary aggregation between 105 and 300 s. R(COX) and R(P2Y) (defined as a ratio of secondary aggregation rate to primary deposition rate) demonstrated 9 of 10 subjects had R(COX)<1 or R(P2Y)<1 following ASA or 2MeSAMP addition, while 6 of 10 subjects had R(P2Y)<1 following MRS 2179 addition. Combined MRS 2179 and 2MeSAMP inhibited primary platelet deposition rate and platelet secondary aggregation beyond that of each individual inhibitor. Receiver-Operator Characteristic area under the curve (AUC) indicated the robustness of R(COX) and R(P2Y) to detect inhibition of secondary platelet aggregation by ASA, 2MeSAMP, and MRS 2179 (AUC of 0.874 0.966, and 0.889, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Microfluidic devices can detect platelet sensitivity to antiplatelet agents. The R-value can serve as a self-normalized metric of platelet function for a single blood sample.
Authors: G L Mendolicchio; D Zavalloni; M Bacci; E Corrada; M Marconi; C Lodigiani; P Presbitero; L Rota; Z M Ruggeri Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Paul A Gurbel; Kevin P Bliden; Joseph DiChiara; Justin Newcomer; Willy Weng; Nagaraj K Neerchal; Tania Gesheff; Srivasavi K Chaganti; Amena Etherington; Udaya S Tantry Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Annalisa Dimasi; Marco Rasponi; Filippo Consolo; Gianfranco B Fiore; Danny Bluestein; Marvin J Slepian; Alberto Redaelli Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: Shu Zhu; Bradley A Herbig; Ruizhi Li; Thomas V Colace; Ryan W Muthard; Keith B Neeves; Scott L Diamond Journal: Biorheology Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Constance C F M J Baaten; Stuart Meacham; Susanne M de Witt; Marion A H Feijge; David J Adams; Jan-Willem N Akkerman; Judith M E M Cosemans; Luigi Grassi; Steve Jupe; Myrto Kostadima; Nadine J A Mattheij; Martin H Prins; Ramiro Ramirez-Solis; Oliver Soehnlein; Frauke Swieringa; Christian Weber; Jacqueline K White; Willem H Ouwehand; Johan W M Heemskerk Journal: Blood Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 25.476
Authors: Elisabeth A Kaza; Matthew C Egalka; Hairu Zhou; Jianchun Chen; Denise Evans; Jayne Prats; Ruizhi Li; Scott L Diamond; Julie A Vincent; Emile A Bacha; Thomas G Diacovo Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci Date: 2017-07-19