Literature DB >> 24364704

Multiple spatial representations determine touch localization on the fingers.

Stephanie Badde1, Brigitte Röder1, Tobias Heed1.   

Abstract

Touch location can be specified in different anatomical and external reference frames. Temporal order judgments (TOJs) in touch are known to be sensitive to conflict between reference frames. To establish which coordinates are involved in localizing touch to a finger, participants performed TOJ on tactile stimuli to 2 out of 4 possible fingers. We induced conflict between hand- and finger-related reference frames, as well as between anatomical and external spatial coding, by selectively crossing 2 fingers. TOJ performance was impaired when both stimuli were applied to crossed fingers, indicating conflict between anatomical and external finger coordinates. In addition, TOJs were impaired when stimuli were mapped to the same hand based on either anatomical or external spatial codes. Accordingly, we observed a benefit rather than impairment with finger crossing when both stimuli were applied to 1 hand. Complementary, participants systematically mislocalized touch to nonstimulated fingers of the targeted hand. The results indicate that touch localization for the fingers involves integration of several sources of spatial information: the anatomical location of the touched finger, its position in external space, the stimulated hand, and the hand to which the touch is (re)mapped in external space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24364704     DOI: 10.1037/a0034690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Integration of anatomical and external response mappings explains crossing effects in tactile localization: A probabilistic modeling approach.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Tobias Heed; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Relative contributions of visual and auditory spatial representations to tactile localization.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Mark Wallace
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Tactile localization biases are modulated by gaze direction.

Authors:  Sonia Medina; Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Irrelevant tactile stimulation biases visual exploration in external coordinates.

Authors:  José P Ossandón; Peter König; Tobias Heed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Towards explaining spatial touch perception: Weighted integration of multiple location codes.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Tobias Heed
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Disentangling the External Reference Frames Relevant to Tactile Localization.

Authors:  Tobias Heed; Jenny Backhaus; Brigitte Röder; Stephanie Badde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Roles of Attentional Shifts and Attentional Reengagement in Resolving The Spatial Compatibility Effect in Tactile Simon-like Tasks.

Authors:  Wanting Zheng; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?

Authors:  Siyi Chen; Zhuanghua Shi; Xuelian Zang; Xiuna Zhu; Leonardo Assumpção; Hermann J Müller; Thomas Geyer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Reach Trajectories Characterize Tactile Localization for Sensorimotor Decision Making.

Authors:  Janina Brandes; Tobias Heed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Using time to investigate space: a review of tactile temporal order judgments as a window onto spatial processing in touch.

Authors:  Tobias Heed; Elena Azañón
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.