Literature DB >> 24364495

Comparison of alternative MS/MS and bioinformatics approaches for confident phosphorylation site localization.

Heike Wiese1, Katja Kuhlmann, Sebastian Wiese, Nadine S Stoepel, Magdalena Pawlas, Helmut E Meyer, Christian Stephan, Martin Eisenacher, Friedel Drepper, Bettina Warscheid.   

Abstract

Over the past years, phosphoproteomics has advanced to a prime tool in signaling research. Since then, an enormous amount of information about in vivo protein phosphorylation events has been collected providing a treasure trove for gaining a better understanding of the molecular processes involved in cell signaling. Yet, we still face the problem of how to achieve correct modification site localization. Here we use alternative fragmentation and different bioinformatics approaches for the identification and confident localization of phosphorylation sites. Phosphopeptide-enriched fractions were analyzed by multistage activation, collision-induced dissociation and electron transfer dissociation (ETD), yielding complementary phosphopeptide identifications. We further found that MASCOT, OMSSA and Andromeda each identified a distinct set of phosphopeptides allowing the number of site assignments to be increased. The postsearch engine SLoMo provided confident phosphorylation site localization, whereas different versions of PTM-Score integrated in MaxQuant differed in performance. Based on high-resolution ETD and higher collisional dissociation (HCD) data sets from a large synthetic peptide and phosphopeptide reference library reported by Marx et al. [Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31 (6), 557-564], we show that an Andromeda/PTM-Score probability of 1 is required to provide an false localization rate (FLR) of 1% for HCD data, while 0.55 is sufficient for high-resolution ETD spectra. Additional analyses of HCD data demonstrated that for phosphotyrosine peptides and phosphopeptides containing two potential phosphorylation sites, PTM-Score probability cutoff values of <1 can be applied to ensure an FLR of 1%. Proper adjustment of localization probability cutoffs allowed us to significantly increase the number of confident sites with an FLR of <1%.Our findings underscore the need for the systematic assessment of FLRs for different score values to report confident modification site localization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24364495     DOI: 10.1021/pr400402s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  15 in total

1.  Functional Proteomics Identifies Acinus L as a Direct Insulin- and Amino Acid-Dependent Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) Substrate.

Authors:  Jennifer Jasmin Schwarz; Heike Wiese; Regine Charlotte Tölle; Mostafa Zarei; Jörn Dengjel; Bettina Warscheid; Kathrin Thedieck
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Spectral Library Based Analysis of Arginine Phosphorylations in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Sabryna Junker; Sandra Maaβ; Andreas Otto; Stephan Michalik; Friedrich Morgenroth; Ulf Gerth; Michael Hecker; Dörte Becher
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Time-resolved Phosphoproteome Analysis of Paradoxical RAF Activation Reveals Novel Targets of ERK.

Authors:  Peter Kubiniok; Hugo Lavoie; Marc Therrien; Pierre Thibault
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  PTMProphet: Fast and Accurate Mass Modification Localization for the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline.

Authors:  David D Shteynberg; Eric W Deutsch; David S Campbell; Michael R Hoopmann; Ulrike Kusebauch; Dave Lee; Luis Mendoza; Mukul K Midha; Zhi Sun; Anthony D Whetton; Robert L Moritz
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Computational methods and opportunities for phosphorylation network medicine.

Authors:  Yian Ann Chen; Steven A Eschrich
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 1.241

6.  Myofibrillar Z-discs Are a Protein Phosphorylation Hot Spot with Protein Kinase C (PKCα) Modulating Protein Dynamics.

Authors:  Lena Reimann; Heike Wiese; Yvonne Leber; Anja N Schwäble; Anna L Fricke; Anne Rohland; Bettina Knapp; Christian D Peikert; Friedel Drepper; Peter F M van der Ven; Gerald Radziwill; Dieter O Fürst; Bettina Warscheid
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 7.  Strategies for mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics using isobaric tagging.

Authors:  Xinyue Liu; Rose Fields; Devin K Schweppe; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 8.  Advances in quantitative high-throughput phosphoproteomics with sample multiplexing.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Devin K Schweppe
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 9.  Integrating phosphoproteomics in systems biology.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Mark R Chance
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 10.  Phosphoproteomics in the Age of Rapid and Deep Proteome Profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas M Riley; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.