Literature DB >> 24361847

A comparison of oxygen saturation data in inpatients with low oxygen saturation using automated continuous monitoring and intermittent manual data charting.

Andreas H Taenzer1, Joshua Pyke, Michael D Herrick, Thomas M Dodds, Susan P McGrath.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The manual collection and charting of traditional vital signs data in inpatient populations have been shown to be inaccurate when compared with true physiologic values. This issue has not been examined with respect to oxygen saturation data despite the increased use of this measurement in systems designed to assess the risk of patient deterioration. Of particular note are the lack of available data examining the accuracy of oxygen saturation charting in a particularly vulnerable group of patients who have prolonged oxygen desaturations (mean SpO2 <90% over at least 15 minutes). In addition, no data are currently available that investigate the often suspected "wake up" effect, resulting from a nurse entering a patient's room to obtain vital signs.
METHODS: In this study, we compared oxygen saturation data recorded manually with data collected by an automated continuous monitoring system in 16 inpatients considered to be at high risk for deterioration (average SpO2 values <90% collected by the automated system in a 15-minute interval before a manual charting event). Data were sampled from the automatic collection system from 2 periods: over a 15-minute period that ended 5 minutes before the time of the manual data collection and charting, and over a 5-minute range before and after the time of the manual data collection and charting. Average saturations from prolonged baseline desaturations (15-minute period) were compared with both the manual and automated data sampled at the time of the nurse's visit to analyze for systematic change and to investigate the presence of an arousal effect.
RESULTS: The manually charted data were higher than those recorded by the automated system. Manually recorded data were on average 6.5% (confidence interval, 4.0%-9.0%) higher in oxygen saturation. No significant arousal effect resulting from the nurse's visit to the patient's room was detected.
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with prolonged desaturations, manual recordings of SpO2 did not reflect physiologic patient state when compared with continuous automated sampling. Currently, early warning scores depend on manual vital sign recordings in many settings; the study data suggest that SpO2 ought to be added to the list of vital sign values that have been shown to be recorded inaccurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24361847     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  11 in total

1.  Physiologic monitor alarms for children: Pushing the limits.

Authors:  Christopher P Bonafide; Patrick W Brady; Carrie Daymont
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.960

2.  Clinical impact of vital sign abnormalities in patients admitted with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an observational study using continuous wireless monitoring.

Authors:  Helge B D Sørensen; Eske K Aasvang; Christian S Meyhoff; Mikkel Elvekjaer; Søren M Rasmussen; Katja K Grønbæk; Celeste M Porsbjerg; Jens-Ulrik Jensen; Camilla Haahr-Raunkjær; Jesper Mølgaard; Marlene Søgaard
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.472

3.  Acute vital signs changes are underrepresented by a conventional electronic health record when compared with automatically acquired data in a single-center tertiary pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.

Authors:  Adam W Lowry; Craig A Futterman; Avihu Z Gazit
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 7.942

4.  Evaluation of a wireless, portable, wearable multi-parameter vital signs monitor in hospitalized neurological and neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  Robert S Weller; Kristina L Foard; Timothy N Harwood
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  [Postoperative remote monitoring].

Authors:  B Preckel; L M Posthuma; M J Visscher; M W Hollmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Smart respiratory monitoring: clinical development and validation of the IPI™ (Integrated Pulmonary Index) algorithm.

Authors:  M Ronen; R Weissbrod; F J Overdyk; S Ajizian
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Smoothing Effect in Vital Sign Recordings: Fact or Fiction? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Manual and Continuous Vital Sign Measurements to Assess Data Smoothing in Postoperative Care.

Authors:  Hamish R Tomlinson; Marco A F Pimentel; Stephen Gerry; David A Clifton; Lionel Tarassenko; Peter J Watkinson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Postoperative Hypoxemia Is Common and Persistent: A Prospective Blinded Observational Study.

Authors:  Zhuo Sun; Daniel I Sessler; Jarrod E Dalton; P J Devereaux; Aram Shahinyan; Amanda J Naylor; Matthew T Hutcherson; Patrick S Finnegan; Vikas Tandon; Saeed Darvish-Kazem; Shaan Chugh; Hussain Alzayer; Andrea Kurz
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Hypoxemia Within the First 3 Postoperative Days Is Associated With Increased 1-Year Postoperative Mortality After Adjusting for Perioperative Opioids and Other Confounders.

Authors:  Karsten Bartels; Alexander Kaizer; Leslie Jameson; Kenneth Bullard; Colleen Dingmann; Ana Fernandez-Bustamante
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Big Data for Clinical Trials: Automated Collection of SpO2 for a Trial of Oxygen Targets during Mechanical Ventilation.

Authors:  Kevin G Buell; Jonathan D Casey; Li Wang; Jonathan P Wanderer; Wesley H Self; Todd W Rice; Matthew W Semler
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.