Literature DB >> 2436171

Defibrillation threshold: a simple and quantitative estimate of the ability to defibrillate.

M F Rattes, D L Jones, A D Sharma, G J Klein.   

Abstract

It has recently been shown that the probability of successful defibrillation as a function of energy has a sigmoidal dose-response relationship. Determination of a defibrillation "dose-response curve" is time consuming and requires multiple defibrillation attempts. On the other hand, determination of a defibrillation threshold is achieved rapidly and would be better suited to study the effect of interventions on the ability to defibrillate patients. We assessed the relationship of defibrillation threshold to the defibrillation "dose-response curve" in twelve open chest, halothane anesthetized pigs. Ventricular fibrillation was induced electrically, and defibrillation was attempted by passing sequential pulse shocks through an indwelling catheter and plaque electrodes. Defibrillation threshold was determined by decreasing the stored voltage of the initial shock until it failed to defibrillate the heart. Five different stored voltage levels distributed around defibrillation threshold were then randomly administered, six times for each level. A "dose-response curve" was obtained for each animal. Defibrillation threshold superimposed on the "dose-response curve" at 76 +/- 7.2 percent (mean +/- SEM) defibrillation success. Energy delivered at 1.5 times average defibrillation threshold was predicted to achieve 100 percent defibrillation success for a single shock in all animals. We conclude that defibrillation threshold provides a simple and quantitative estimate of the ability to defibrillate with a predictable relationship to the "dose-response curve."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2436171     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb05926.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.

Authors:  M Bahu; B P Knight; R Weiss; S J Hahn; R Goyal; E G Daoud; K C Man; F Morady; S A Strickberger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Non-monotonous dose response function of the termination of spiral wave chaos.

Authors:  Thomas Lilienkamp; Ulrich Parlitz; Stefan Luther
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  [Influence of waveform and configuration of electrodes on the defibrillation threshold of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators].

Authors:  M Block; D Hammel; G Breithardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

4.  How to Manage a High Defibrillation Threshold in ICD Patients: and Does it Really Matter?

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Matassini; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

5.  Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Implantation Without Defibrillation Threshold Testing: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Bandar Al-Ghamdi; Azam Shafquat; Nadiah Alruwaili; Shisamma Emmanual; Mohamed Shoukri; Yaseen Mallawi
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2017-12-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.