PURPOSE: To examine perceptions of military personnel about tobacco use. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of (1) focus group and (2) interview data. SETTING: U.S. military. SUBJECTS: Total participants (n = 241): Enlisted personnel, supervisors (n = 189 individuals participating in 23 focus groups), tobacco control managers, and policy leaders (n = 52 interview participants). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MEASURES: Not applicable. ANALYSIS: Inductive, iterative coding for salient themes using an interpretive approach. Application of the concept of mediatory myths, used by institutions to cover over internal contradictions. RESULTS: All types of participants endorsed the idea that tobacco was needed in the military for stress relief. Types of stress identified included fitting in, (relationships with coworkers and superiors) and control of workflow (taking breaks). Participants also discussed beliefs about the impact of tobacco on the military mission, and institutional sanction of tobacco use. CONCLUSION: Despite tobacco's well-documented negative effects on fitness, the myth that tobacco relieves stress serves several institutional functions in the military. It serves to minimize perceptions of stress on the fitness of personnel, suggests that stress can be managed solely by individuals, and institutionalizes tobacco use. Growing recognition among military leadership that countering stress is essential to fitness offers an opportunity to challenge this myth.
PURPOSE: To examine perceptions of military personnel about tobacco use. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of (1) focus group and (2) interview data. SETTING: U.S. military. SUBJECTS: Total participants (n = 241): Enlisted personnel, supervisors (n = 189 individuals participating in 23 focus groups), tobacco control managers, and policy leaders (n = 52 interview participants). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MEASURES: Not applicable. ANALYSIS: Inductive, iterative coding for salient themes using an interpretive approach. Application of the concept of mediatory myths, used by institutions to cover over internal contradictions. RESULTS: All types of participants endorsed the idea that tobacco was needed in the military for stress relief. Types of stress identified included fitting in, (relationships with coworkers and superiors) and control of workflow (taking breaks). Participants also discussed beliefs about the impact of tobacco on the military mission, and institutional sanction of tobacco use. CONCLUSION: Despite tobacco's well-documented negative effects on fitness, the myth that tobacco relieves stress serves several institutional functions in the military. It serves to minimize perceptions of stress on the fitness of personnel, suggests that stress can be managed solely by individuals, and institutionalizes tobacco use. Growing recognition among military leadership that countering stress is essential to fitness offers an opportunity to challenge this myth.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health focus: smoking control; Manuscript format: research; Military; Outcome measure: N/A; Policy; Prevention Research; Qualitative Research; Research purpose: descriptive; Setting: military; Strategy: N/A; Study design: qualitative; Target population age: adults; Target population circumstances: N/A; Tobacco; USA
Authors: Charles W Hoge; Carl A Castro; Stephen C Messer; Dennis McGurk; Dave I Cotting; Robert L Koffman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K L Reynolds; H A Heckel; C E Witt; J W Martin; J A Pollard; J J Knapik; B H Jones Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 1994 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Arthur Williams; Bonnie M Hagerty; Steven M Yousha; Julie Horrocks; Kenneth S Hoyle; Dawei Liu Journal: Mil Med Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Walker S C Poston; Sara A Jahnke; Christopher K Haddock; Melissa L Hyder; Jennifer E Taylor; Harry A Lando; Christopher M Kaipust Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-09-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Robert Basaza; Emmanuel Otieno; Ambrose Musinguzi; Possy Mugyenyi; Christopher K Haddock Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Brittany D Linde; Jon O Ebbert; Darrell R Schroeder; Andrew C Hanson; G Wayne Talcott; Robert C Klesges Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Harry A Lando; Mark E Michaud; Walker S C Poston; Sara A Jahnke; Larry Williams; Christopher K Haddock Journal: Tob Control Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Melissa A Little; Margaret C Fahey; Robert C Klesges; Timothy McMurry; Gerald W Talcott Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Elizabeth A Lando-King; Ruth E Malone; Christopher K Haddock; Walker S Carlos Poston; Harry A Lando; Sara A Jahnke; Nita Hawk; Elizabeth A Smith Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2017-04-01
Authors: Kathleen J Porter; Rebecca A Krukowski; Gloribel Bonilla; Lisa McKenna; Gerald W Talcott; Melissa A Little Journal: Mil Med Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 1.563
Authors: Tess Boley Cruz; Shyanika W Rose; Brianna A Lienemann; M Justin Byron; Helen I Meissner; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Li-Ling Huang; Dana M Carroll; Claradina Soto; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Tob Induc Dis Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 2.600