Literature DB >> 25163466

Banning cigarette smoking on US Navy submarines: a case study.

Harry A Lando1, Mark E Michaud2, Walker S C Poston3, Sara A Jahnke4, Larry Williams5, Christopher K Haddock6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The military has had a long pro-tobacco tradition. Despite official policy discouraging smoking, tobacco still is widely seen as part of military culture. While active smoking has presented a particular challenge for the military, in recent years there also has been increasing concern with secondhand smoke. This is especially true in closed environments and submarines may be deployed for months at a time. The current case study describes the successful implementation by the Navy of a comprehensive ban on smoking aboard submarines.
METHODS: The authors searched documents on the internet, popular media, military-based news outlets and the scientific literature. We also conducted interviews with Navy officers who were instrumental in policy implementation.
FINDINGS: Data demonstrating substantial exposure of non-smokers to tobacco smoke aboard submarines had major impact on successful adoption of the policy. A systematic and extended roll out of the ban included establishing a working group, soliciting input and active engagement from submarine personnel, and offering cessation assistance. Support was enlisted from Chief Petty Officers who could have been strongly opposed but who became strong proponents. Fewer problems were encountered than had been expected. In contrast to a previous unsuccessful attempt by a Navy captain to ban smoking on his ship, the ban was adopted without apparent tobacco industry interference.
CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned included the importance of strong empirical support, effective framing of the issue, setting a realistic timeline, soliciting support from key personnel and providing appropriate resources. These lessons have implications for those considering further tobacco policy changes in the military and elsewhere. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cotinine; Public opinion; Public policy; Secondhand smoke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25163466      PMCID: PMC4344412          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  17 in total

1.  A national survey of cigarette prices at military retail outlets.

Authors:  Sara A Jahnke; Christopher K Haddock; W S Carlos Poston; Melissa L Hyder; Harry Lando
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The clinical implications of a smoking ban on submarines in the U.S. Navy.

Authors:  Anil N Shah; Michael J Arnold
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Forcing the Navy to sell cigarettes on ships: how the tobacco industry and politicians torpedoed Navy tobacco control.

Authors:  Naphtali Offen; Sarah R Arvey; Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Evaluating the effectiveness of the US Navy and Marine Corps Tobacco Policy: an assessment of secondhand smoke exposure in US Navy submariners.

Authors:  Nicholas J Yarnall; Linda M Hughes; Paul S Turnbull; Mark Michaud
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Military line leadership and tobacco control: perspectives of military policy leaders and tobacco control managers.

Authors:  Walker S C Poston; Richard R Suminski; Kevin M Hoffman; Nattinee Jitnarin; Joseph Hughey; Harry A Lando; Amelia Winsby; Keith Haddock
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  "Everywhere the soldier will be": wartime tobacco promotion in the US military.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Military exceptionalism or tobacco exceptionalism: how civilian health leaders' beliefs may impede military tobacco control efforts.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Why strong tobacco control measures "can't" be implemented in the U.S. Military: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Tobacco promotion to military personnel: "the plums are here to be plucked".

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Advance and retreat: tobacco control policy in the U.S. military.

Authors:  Sarah R Arvey; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  5 in total

1.  Perspectives of US military commanders on tobacco use and tobacco control policy.

Authors:  Walker S C Poston; Christopher K Haddock; Sara A Jahnke; Nattinee Jitnarin; Ruth E Malone; Elizabeth A Smith
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  "Nobody Views It As a Negative Thing to Smoke": A Qualitative Study of the Relationship Between United States Air Force Culture and Tobacco Use.

Authors:  Rebecca A Krukowski; Kathleen Porter; Tina Boothe; G Wayne Talcott; Melissa A Little
Journal:  Mil Psychol       Date:  2021-10-08

3.  Veterans' views on military tobacco use and tobacco control policy.

Authors:  E A Smith; W S C Poston; C K Haddock; S A Jahnke; R E Malone
Journal:  Mil Behav Health       Date:  2017-09-22

4.  "Throwing a rock at their armored tank": civilian authority and military tobacco control.

Authors:  Quinn Grundy; Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Pro-tobacco marketing and anti-tobacco campaigns aimed at vulnerable populations: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Tess Boley Cruz; Shyanika W Rose; Brianna A Lienemann; M Justin Byron; Helen I Meissner; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Li-Ling Huang; Dana M Carroll; Claradina Soto; Jennifer B Unger
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.