Literature DB >> 24358717

Phylogenetic trait-based analyses of ecological networks.

Nicole E Rafferty1, Anthony R Ives2.   

Abstract

Ecological networks of two interacting guilds of species, such as flowering plants and pollinators, are common in nature, and studying their structure can yield insights into their resilience to environmental disturbances. Here we develop analytical methods for exploring the strengths of interactions within bipartite networks consisting of two guilds of phylogenetically related species. We then apply these methods to investigate the resilience of a plant-pollinator community to anticipated climate change. The methods allow the statistical assessment of, for example, whether closely related pollinators are more likely to visit plants with similar relative frequencies, and whether closely related pollinators tend to visit closely related plants. The methods can also incorporate trait information, allowing us to identify which plant traits are likely responsible for attracting different pollinators. These questions are important for our study of 14 prairie plants and their 22 insect pollinators. Over the last 70 years, six of the plants have advanced their flowering, while eight have not. When we experimentally forced earlier flowering times, five of the six advanced-flowering species experienced higher pollinator visitation rates, whereas only one of the eight other species had more visits; this network thus appears resilient to climate change, because those species with advanced flowering have ample pollinators earlier in the season. Using the methods developed here, we show that advanced-flowering plants did not have a distinct pollinator community from the other eight species. Furthermore, pollinator phylogeny did not explain pollinator community composition; closely related pollinators were not more likely to visit the same plant species. However, differences among pollinator communities visiting different plants were explained by plant height, floral color, and symmetry. As a result, closely related plants attracted similar numbers of pollinators. By parsing out characteristics that explain why plants share pollinators, we can identify plant species that likely share a common fate in a changing climate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24358717      PMCID: PMC3874136          DOI: 10.1890/12-1948.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  25 in total

1.  Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin.

Authors:  N L Bradley; A C Leopold; J Ross; W Huffaker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants.

Authors:  A H Fitter; R S R Fitter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

Authors:  Simon P Blomberg; Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Phenology and climate change: a long-term study in a Mediterranean locality.

Authors:  Oscar Gordo; Juan José Sanz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  Jane Memmott; Paul G Craze; Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks.

Authors:  Enrico L Rezende; Jessica E Lavabre; Paulo R Guimarães; Pedro Jordano; Jordi Bascompte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The relationships between floral traits and specificity of pollination systems in three Scandinavian plant communities.

Authors:  Amparo Lázaro; Stein Joar Hegland; Orjan Totland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization.

Authors:  Theodora Petanidou; Athanasios S Kallimanis; Joseph Tzanopoulos; Stefanos P Sgardelis; John D Pantis
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau's Concord: a community perspective.

Authors:  Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Richard B Primack
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Phylogenetic analysis of trophic associations.

Authors:  A R Ives; H C J Godfray
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  12 in total

1.  How phylogeny shapes the taxonomic and functional structure of plant-insect networks.

Authors:  Sébastien Ibanez; Fabien Arène; Sébastien Lavergne
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Competition and hybridization drive interspecific territoriality in birds.

Authors:  Jonathan P Drury; Madeline C Cowen; Gregory F Grether
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  taxize: taxonomic search and retrieval in R.

Authors:  Scott A Chamberlain; Eduard Szöcs
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-09-18

4.  Comment on "The hologenomic basis of speciation: gut bacteria cause hybrid lethality in the genus Nasonia".

Authors:  James Angus Chandler; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Lessons from Red Data Books: Plant Vulnerability Increases with Floral Complexity.

Authors:  Anastasia Stefanaki; Aphrodite Kantsa; Thomas Tscheulin; Martha Charitonidou; Theodora Petanidou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Studying plant-pollinator interactions in a changing climate: A review of approaches.

Authors:  Diane L Byers
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Linear filtering reveals false negatives in species interaction data.

Authors:  Michiel Stock; Timothée Poisot; Willem Waegeman; Bernard De Baets
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Unmasking structural patterns in incidence matrices: an application to ecological data.

Authors:  Bernat Bramon Mora; Giulio V Dalla Riva; Daniel B Stouffer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Inferring the Effect of Species Interactions on Trait Evolution.

Authors:  Liang Xu; Sander Van Doorn; Hanno Hildenbrandt; Rampal S Etienne
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  Phylogenetic test of speciation by host shift in leaf cone moths (Caloptilia) feeding on maples (Acer).

Authors:  Ryosuke Nakadai; Atsushi Kawakita
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.