Literature DB >> 24358695

Experimental separation of genetic and demographic factors on extinction risk in wild populations.

J Timothy Wootton1, Catherine A Pfister2.   

Abstract

When populations reach small size, an extinction risk vortex may arise from genetic (inbreeding depression, genetic drift) and ecological (demographic stochasticity, Allee effects, environmental fluctuation) processes. The relative contribution of these processes to extinction in wild populations is unknown, but important for conserving endangered species. In experimental field populations of a harvested kelp (Postelsia palmaeformis), in which we independently varied initial genetic diversity (completely inbred, control, outbred) and population size, ecological processes dominated the risk of extinction, whereas the contribution of genetic diversity was slight. Our results match theoretical predictions that demographic processes will generally doom small populations to extinction before genetic effects act strongly, prioritize detailed ecological analysis over descriptions of genetic structure in assessing conservation of at-risk species, and highlight the need for field experiments manipulating both demographics and genetic structure on long-term extinction risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24358695     DOI: 10.1890/12-1828.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  13 in total

1.  Reply to Wootton and Pfister: The search for general context should include synthesis with laboratory model systems.

Authors:  Ruth A Hufbauer; Marianna Szűcs; Emily Kasyon; Courtney Youngberg; Michael J Koontz; Christopher Richards; Ty Tuff; Brett A Melbourne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Processes affecting extinction risk in the laboratory and in nature.

Authors:  J Timothy Wootton; Catherine A Pfister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Interactions between demography, genetics, and landscape connectivity increase extinction probability for a small population of large carnivores in a major metropolitan area.

Authors:  John F Benson; Peter J Mahoney; Jeff A Sikich; Laurel E K Serieys; John P Pollinger; Holly B Ernest; Seth P D Riley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Demography, genetics, and decline of a spatially structured population of lekking bird.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Jérôme G Prunier; Martin Laporte; Jérôme M W Gippet; Laurent Boualit; François Guérold; Alain Laurent; Francesco Foletti; Gwenaël Jacob
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Nowhere to Go but Up: Impacts of Climate Change on Demographics of a Short-Range Endemic (Crotalus willardi obscurus) in the Sky-Islands of Southwestern North America.

Authors:  Mark A Davis; Marlis R Douglas; Colleen T Webb; Michael L Collyer; Andrew T Holycross; Charles W Painter; Larry K Kamees; Michael E Douglas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Demographic histories and genetic diversities of Fennoscandian marine and landlocked ringed seal subspecies.

Authors:  Tommi Nyman; Mia Valtonen; Jouni Aspi; Minna Ruokonen; Mervi Kunnasranta; Jukka U Palo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Rapid evolution destabilizes species interactions in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  Alejandra Rodríguez-Verdugo; Martin Ackermann
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Replaying Evolution to Test the Cause of Extinction of One Ecotype in an Experimentally Evolved Population.

Authors:  Caroline B Turner; Zachary D Blount; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The interaction between selection, demography and selfing and how it affects population viability.

Authors:  Diala Abu Awad; Diala Abu Awad; Sophie Gallina; Cyrille Bonamy; Sylvain Billiard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Which host-dependent insects are most prone to coextinction under changed climates?

Authors:  Melinda L Moir; Lesley Hughes; Peter A Vesk; Mei Chen Leng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.