| Literature DB >> 24358177 |
Alphonsine A Koffi1, Ludovic P Ahoua Alou2, Jean-Paul K Kabran1, Raphael N'Guessan3, Cédric Pennetier4.
Abstract
Insecticide resistance constitutes a major threat that may undermine current gain in malaria control in most endemic countries. National Malaria Control Programmes (NMCPs) need as much information as possible on the resistance status of malaria vectors and underlying mechanisms in order to implement the most relevant and efficient control strategy. Bioassays, biochemical and molecular analysis were performed on An. gambiae collected in six sentinel sites in Côte d'Ivoire. The sites were selected on the basis of their bioclimatic status and agricultural practices. An. gambiae populations across sites showed high levels of resistance to organochloride, pyrethroid and carbamate insecticides. The kdr and ace-1(R) mutations were detected in almost all sentinel sites with mosquitoes on the coastal and cotton growing areas mostly affected by these mutations. At almost all sites, the levels of detoxifying enzymes (mixed-function oxidases (MFOs), non-specific esterases (NSE) and glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs)) in An. gambiae populations were significantly higher than the levels found in the susceptible strain Kisumu. Pre-exposure of mosquitoes to PBO, an inhibitor of MFOs and NSEs, significantly increased mortality rates to pyrethroids and carbamates in mosquitoes but resistance in most cases was not fully synergised by PBO, inferring a residual role of additional mechanisms, including kdr and ace-1 site insensitivity. The large distribution of resistance in Côte d'Ivoire raises an important question of whether to continue to deploy pyrethroid-based long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and insecticide residual spraying (IRS) towards which resistance continues to rise with no guarantee that the level of resistance would not compromise their efficacy. Innovative strategies that combine insecticide and synergists in LLINs or spatially LLIN and an effective non-pyrethroid insecticide for IRS could be in the short term the best practice for the NMCP to manage insecticide resistance in malaria vectors in Côte d'Ivoire and other endemic countries facing resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24358177 PMCID: PMC3864995 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of Côte d'Ivoire showing the localities in the different ecological zones where anopheline mosquitoes were collected.
Description of sampling sites, agricultural practices, rural/urban status, bioclimatic zones and the distribution of the molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s.
| Localities | Bio-climate status | Longitude | Latitude | Status | Main agricultural practices | Molecular forms | N | |
| S (%) | M (%) | |||||||
| Korhogo | sub-sudannian | −5.626144 | 9.450654 | urban | Rice, cotton, vegetables | 23 (71.9) | 9 (28.1) | 32 |
| Kaforo | sub-sudannian | −5.685582 | 9.277895 | rural | Rice, cotton, vegetables | 21 (65.6) | 11 (34.4) | 32 |
| Yamoussoukro | pre-forest | −5.6627248 | 6.820336 | urban | Rice, vegetables | 5 (16.1) | 26 (83.9) | 31 |
| Man | rain forest, montains | −7.562108 | 7.412094 | urban | Cocoa, coffee, rice | 14 (43.8) | 18 (56.2) | 32 |
| Zele | rain forest, montains | −7.58967 | 7.36381 | rural | Cocoa, coffee, rice | 25 (78.1) | 7 (21.9) | 32 |
| Abengourou | rain forest | −3.496321 | 6.729096 | urban | Cocoa, coffee, rice | 3 (9.4) | 29 (90.6) | 32 |
| San-Pedro | rain forest | −6.616667 | 4.733333 | urban | Rubber, palm trees, coconut palms, vegetable | 31 (100) | 31 | |
| Bingerville | rain forest | −3.90043 | 5.35929 | urban | Vegetables | 11 (34.4) | 21 (65.6) | 32 |
| Port-Bouët | rain forest | −3.919482 | 5.24823 | urban | Vegetable, horticultural | 32 (100) | 32 | |
| Yopougon | rain forest | −4.021887 | 5.324857 | urban | Vegetables | 32 (100) | 32 | |
Figure 2Insecticidal effects of diagnostic concentrations of insecticides against Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from different sentinel sites (60 min contact in WHO tube tests).
Distributionof genotypes and allelic frequency of the L1014F kdr mutation in An.gambiaes.s.populations from sentinel sites.
| Molecular form | ||||||||||||
| M | S | |||||||||||
| n1 | SS | RS | RR | f(R) | n2 | SS | RS | RR | f(R) | n1+n2 | f(R) | |
| Bingerville | 21 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 0.881 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0.682 | 32 | 0.813 |
| Port-Bouët | 31 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 0.855 | 31 | 0.855 | |||||
| Yopougon | 31 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 0.468 | 31 | 0.468 | |||||
| Yamoussoukro | 26 | 4 | 17 | 3 | 0.479 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.500 | 31 | 0.484 |
| Korhogo | 9 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0.722 | 23 | 0 | 11 | 12 | 0.761 | 32 | 0.750 |
| Kaforo | 10 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 0.800 | 20 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 0.825 | 30 | 0.817 |
| Man | 15 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0.433 | 11 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 0.545 | 26 | 0.481 |
| Zele | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.500 | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0.500 | 30 | 0.500 |
| San-Pedro | 32 | 4 | 10 | 18 | 0.719 | 32 | 0.719 | |||||
| Abengourou | 29 | 3 | 22 | 4 | 0.517 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.666 | 32 | 0.531 |
n: number analysed; f(R): frequency of the mutation.
ace-1 allele frequency distribution in An. gambiae s.s. molecular forms from Côte d'Ivoire.
| M molecular form | S molecular form | |||||||||
| Localities | N | S | R | D | FHW | N | S | R | D | FHW |
| Bingerville | 20 | 0.74 | 0.00 [0-0.301] | 0.26 [0-0.420] | 0.10 | 11 | 0.43 | 0.00 [0-0.400] |
|
|
| Port-Bouët | 32 | 0.53 | 0.00 [0-0.241] |
|
| 0 | ||||
| Yopougon | 32 | 0.81 | 0.00 [0-0.235] | 0.19 [0-0.304] | 0.13 | 0 | ||||
| Yamoussoukro | 26 | 0.85 | 0.00 [0-0.225] | 0.15 [0-0.262] | 0.30 | 5 | 0.89 | 0.00 [0-0.367] | 0.11 [0-0.390] | 0.74 |
| Korhogo | 8 | 0.94 | 0.00 [0-0.245] | 0.06 [0-0.255] | 0.80 | 23 | 0.72 | 0.28 [0.122-0.422] | 0.00 [0-0.228] | 1.00 |
| Kaforo | 9 | 0.61 | 0.39 [0.180-0.617] | 0.00 [0-0.299] | 1.00 | 21 | 0.76 | 0.22 [0.053-0.379] | 0.03 [0-0.264] | 0.82 |
| Man | 17 | 0.87 | 0.00 [0-0.241] | 0.13 [0-0.269] | 0.46 | 14 | 0.85 | 0.00 [0-0.284] | 0.15 [0-0.325] | 0.41 |
| Zele | 7 | 1.00 | 0.00 [0-0.128] | 0.00 [0-0.128] | 1.00 | 25 | 0.72 | 0.20 [0.048-0.381] | 0.08 [0-0.316] | 0.46 |
| San-Pedro | 32 | 1.00 | 0.00 [0-0.030] | 0.00 [0-0.030] | 1.00 | 0 | ||||
| Abengourou | 29 | 1.00 | 0.00 [0-0.033] | 0.00 [0-0.033] | 1.00 | 3 | 1.00 | 0.00 [0-0.274] | 0.00 [0-0.274] | 1.00 |
N: number analysed; Values in brackets represent the confidence interval at 95%
S, R and D represent the estimated frequencies of the susceptible, resistant and duplicated alleles respectively. The probability of the departure from Hardy-Weinberg expectation (F HW) is bold when significant and has a star when still significant after Bonferroni correction.
Figure 3Insecticidal effects of diagnostic concentrations of one pyrethroid insecticide (permethrin) and one carbamate insecticide (carbosulfan) (60 min contact in WHO tube tests) with or without a 60 min pre-exposition to PBO.
Mean level of NSE. MFO and GST activity in An. gambiae s.s. populations from the sentinel sites relative to the susceptible reference strain Kisumu.
| NSE | MFO | GST | ||||||||||
| Localities | N | μmol α-naphthol/min/mg protein | AR | N | μmol ß-naphthol/min/mg protein | AR | N | nmol P450/mg protein | QR | N | nmol GSH conj/min/mg protein | AR |
| Kisumu | 40 | 0.086±0.007 | 40 | 0.084±0.007 | 38 | 0.095±0.008 | 40 | 0.295±0.032 | ||||
| Yopougon | 32 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 24 |
|
|
| Port-Bouët | 17 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 14 |
|
|
| Korhogo | 32 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 21 |
|
|
| Kaforo | 15 |
|
| 15 | 0.105±0.027 |
| 15 |
|
| - | ||
| Yamoussoukro | 33 |
|
| 33 | 0.138±0.028 |
| 32 |
|
| 32 |
|
|
| Abengourou | 32 | 0.036±0.011 |
| 32 | 0.043±0.009 |
| 31 |
|
| 25 | 0.501±0.268 |
|
| Man | 32 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 26 |
|
|
| Zele | 32 | 0.107±0.016 |
| 32 | 0.089±0.014 |
| 33 | 0.163±0.037 |
| 28 | 0.638±0.192 |
|
| San-Pedro | 40 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 34 | 0.471±0.084 |
|
N: total tested. Number in bold indicated samples where enzyme level or activity was significantly higher compared with Kisumu. (P<0.05) at the 5% level. AR: Activity Ratios. QR: Quantity ratios. GSH: Reduced form of glutathione.