BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aging is an important determinant of ischemic stroke outcomes. Both clinical and experimental stroke studies have shown that aging negatively correlates with infarct volumes but is associated with worsened functional recovery after stroke. This may correspond to a differing cellular and molecular response to stroke in the aged versus young brain. It was hypothesized in this study that the smaller injury seen in the aged ischemic brain is because of structural differences in microvasculature with aging or differences in intraischemic tissue perfusion. METHODS: Both young and aged C57BL6 mice were subject to middle cerebral artery occlusion modeling. Laser speckle flowmetry was used to study the functional dynamics of cerebral perfusion, and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran staining was performed to examine the structural change in microvasculature. In separate cohorts, cresyl violet staining and immunohistochemistry with CD31 and IgG antibodies were applied to further assess the microvascular density and blood-brain barrier breakdown after stroke. RESULTS: No difference in cerebral blood flow was seen at the baseline, intraischemically, and postreperfusion in young versus aged mice. FITC-dextran and CD31 staining did not show significant differences in the microvascular density between young and aged ischemic brains. More extravasation of IgG through the blood-brain barrier was found in the young versus aged cohort at both 24 and 72 hours after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebrovascular dynamics and perfusion are not responsible for the different stroke phenotypes seen in the young versus aged animals, which may be more related to different levels of blood-brain barrier breakdown.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aging is an important determinant of ischemic stroke outcomes. Both clinical and experimental stroke studies have shown that aging negatively correlates with infarct volumes but is associated with worsened functional recovery after stroke. This may correspond to a differing cellular and molecular response to stroke in the aged versus young brain. It was hypothesized in this study that the smaller injury seen in the aged ischemic brain is because of structural differences in microvasculature with aging or differences in intraischemic tissue perfusion. METHODS: Both young and aged C57BL6 mice were subject to middle cerebral artery occlusion modeling. Laser speckle flowmetry was used to study the functional dynamics of cerebral perfusion, and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran staining was performed to examine the structural change in microvasculature. In separate cohorts, cresyl violet staining and immunohistochemistry with CD31 and IgG antibodies were applied to further assess the microvascular density and blood-brain barrier breakdown after stroke. RESULTS: No difference in cerebral blood flow was seen at the baseline, intraischemically, and postreperfusion in young versus aged mice. FITC-dextran and CD31 staining did not show significant differences in the microvascular density between young and aged ischemic brains. More extravasation of IgG through the blood-brain barrier was found in the young versus aged cohort at both 24 and 72 hours after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebrovascular dynamics and perfusion are not responsible for the different stroke phenotypes seen in the young versus aged animals, which may be more related to different levels of blood-brain barrier breakdown.
Authors: M Knoflach; B Matosevic; M Rücker; M Furtner; A Mair; G Wille; A Zangerle; P Werner; J Ferrari; C Schmidauer; L Seyfang; S Kiechl; J Willeit Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Smriti Agarwal; Daniel J Scoffings; P Simon Jones; S Tulasi Marrapu; Patrick J Barry; Eoin W O'Brien; Jean-Claude Baron; Elizabeth A Warburton Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2012-11-24 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Meaghan Roy-O'Reilly; Rodney M Ritzel; Sarah E Conway; Ilene Staff; Gilbert Fortunato; Louise D McCullough Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Rodney M Ritzel; Anita R Patel; Monica Spychala; Rajkumar Verma; Joshua Crapser; Edward C Koellhoffer; Anna Schrecengost; Evan R Jellison; Liang Zhu; Venugopal Reddy Venna; Louise D McCullough Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gary P Morris; Amanda L Wright; Richard P Tan; Amadeus Gladbach; Lars M Ittner; Bryce Vissel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lei Liu; Mary K Vollmer; Victoria M Fernandez; Yasmin Dweik; Hocheol Kim; Sylvain Doré Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 5.505
Authors: Anjali Chauhan; Jacob Hudobenko; Abdullah Al Mamun; Edward C Koellhoffer; Anthony Patrizz; Rodney M Ritzel; Bhanu P Ganesh; Louise D McCullough Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 8.322