INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this paper is to assess the value of 7 Tesla (7 T) MRI for the depiction of brain stem and cranial nerve (CN) anatomy. METHODS: Six volunteers were examined at 7 T using high-resolution SWI, MPRAGE, MP2RAGE, 3D SPACE T2, T2, and PD images to establish scanning parameters targeted at optimizing spatial resolution. Direct comparisons between 3 and 7 T were performed in two additional subjects using the finalized sequences (3 T: T2, PD, MPRAGE, SWAN; 7 T: 3D T2, MPRAGE, SWI, MP2RAGE). Artifacts and the depiction of structures were evaluated by two neuroradiologists using a standardized score sheet. RESULTS: Sequences could be established for high-resolution 7 T imaging even in caudal cranial areas. High in-plane resolution T2, PD, and SWI images provided depiction of inner brain stem structures such as pons fibers, raphe, reticular formation, nerve roots, and periaqueductal gray. MPRAGE and MP2RAGE provided clear depiction of the CNs. 3D T2 images improved depiction of inner brain structure in comparison to T2 images at 3 T. Although the 7-T SWI sequence provided improved contrast to some inner structures, extended areas were influenced by artifacts due to image disturbances from susceptibility differences. CONCLUSIONS: Seven-tesla imaging of basal brain areas is feasible and might have significant impact on detection and diagnosis in patients with specific diseases, e.g., trigeminal pain related to affection of the nerve root. Some inner brain stem structures can be depicted at 3 T, but certain sequences at 7 T, in particular 3D SPACE T2, are superior in producing anatomical in vivo images of deep brain stem structures.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this paper is to assess the value of 7 Tesla (7 T) MRI for the depiction of brain stem and cranial nerve (CN) anatomy. METHODS: Six volunteers were examined at 7 T using high-resolution SWI, MPRAGE, MP2RAGE, 3D SPACE T2, T2, and PD images to establish scanning parameters targeted at optimizing spatial resolution. Direct comparisons between 3 and 7 T were performed in two additional subjects using the finalized sequences (3 T: T2, PD, MPRAGE, SWAN; 7 T: 3D T2, MPRAGE, SWI, MP2RAGE). Artifacts and the depiction of structures were evaluated by two neuroradiologists using a standardized score sheet. RESULTS: Sequences could be established for high-resolution 7 T imaging even in caudal cranial areas. High in-plane resolution T2, PD, and SWI images provided depiction of inner brain stem structures such as pons fibers, raphe, reticular formation, nerve roots, and periaqueductal gray. MPRAGE and MP2RAGE provided clear depiction of the CNs. 3D T2 images improved depiction of inner brain structure in comparison to T2 images at 3 T. Although the 7-T SWI sequence provided improved contrast to some inner structures, extended areas were influenced by artifacts due to image disturbances from susceptibility differences. CONCLUSIONS: Seven-tesla imaging of basal brain areas is feasible and might have significant impact on detection and diagnosis in patients with specific diseases, e.g., trigeminal pain related to affection of the nerve root. Some inner brain stem structures can be depicted at 3 T, but certain sequences at 7 T, in particular 3D SPACE T2, are superior in producing anatomical in vivo images of deep brain stem structures.
Authors: Ingo S Nölte; Lars Gerigk; Mansour Al-Zghloul; Christoph Groden; Hans U Kerl Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Robin M Heidemann; Dimo Ivanov; Robert Trampel; Fabrizio Fasano; Heiko Meyer; Josef Pfeuffer; Robert Turner Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ashley K Lotfipour; Samuel Wharton; Stefan T Schwarz; V Gontu; Andreas Schäfer; Andrew M Peters; Richard W Bowtell; Dorothee P Auer; Penny A Gowland; Nin P S Bajaj Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Y Wang; S R Butros; X Shuai; Y Dai; C Chen; M Liu; E M Haacke; J Hu; H Xu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Saikat Sengupta; E Brian Welch; Yansong Zhao; David Foxall; Piotr Starewicz; Adam W Anderson; John C Gore; Malcolm J Avison Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-03-12 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Mauro Costagli; Douglas A C Kelley; Mark R Symms; Laura Biagi; Riccardo Stara; Eleonora Maggioni; Gianluigi Tiberi; Carmen Barba; Renzo Guerrini; Mirco Cosottini; Michela Tosetti Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2014-04-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: M J Hoch; M T Bruno; A Faustin; N Cruz; L Crandall; T Wisniewski; O Devinsky; T M Shepherd Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Branislava Ćurčić-Blake; Lisette van der Meer; Gerdina H M Pijnenborg; Anthony S David; André Aleman Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: M J Hoch; S Chung; N Ben-Eliezer; M T Bruno; G M Fatterpekar; T M Shepherd Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Thomas F Barrett; Hadrien A Dyvorne; Francesco Padormo; Puneet S Pawha; Bradley N Delman; Raj K Shrivastava; Priti Balchandani Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Roberta Sclocco; Florian Beissner; Marta Bianciardi; Jonathan R Polimeni; Vitaly Napadow Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Annie E Arrighi-Allisan; Bradley N Delman; John W Rutland; Amy Yao; Judy Alper; Kuang-Han Huang; Priti Balchandani; Raj K Shrivastava Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 2.104