Literature DB >> 24357035

Comparative investigation of the use of various commercial microcarriers as a substrate for culturing mammalian cells.

Duygu Ayyildiz-Tamis1, Kamuran Avcı, S Ismet Deliloglu-Gurhan.   

Abstract

Microcarriers provide large adhesion area allowing high cell densities in bioreactor systems. This study focused on the investigation of cell adhesion and cell growth characteristics of both anchorage-dependent CHO-K1 and anchorage-independent Ag8 myeloma cell lines cultivated on four different microcarriers (Biosilon®, Microhex®, Cytodex 3®, Cytoline 2®) by considering the cell kinetics and physiological data. Experiments were performed in both static and agitated cell culture systems by using 24-well tissue culture plates and then 50-ml spinner flasks. In agitated cultures, the highest specific growth rates (0.026 h for CHO-K1 and 0.061 h for Ag8 cell line) were obtained with Cytodex 3® and Cytoline 2® microcarriers for CHO-K1 and Ag8 cell line, respectively. Metabolic characteristics showed some variation among the cultures with the four microcarriers. The most significant being the higher production of lactate with microcarriers with CHO-K1 cells relative to the Ag8 cells. SEM analyses revealed the differences in the morphology of the cells along with microcarriers. On Cytodex 3® and Cytoline 2®, CHO-K1 cells attached to the substratum through long, slender filopodia, whereas the cells showed a flat morphology by covering the substratum on the Biosilon® and Microhex®. Ag8 cells maintained their spherical shapes throughout the culture for all types of microcarriers. In an attempt to scale-up, productions were carried out in 50-ml spinner flasks. Cytodex 3® (for CHO-K1 cells) and Cytoline 2® (for Ag8 cells) were evaluated. The results demonstrate that high yield of biomass could be achieved through the immobilization of the cells in each culture system. And cell cultures on microcarriers, especially on Cytodex 3® and Cytoline 2®, represented a good potential as microcarriers for larger scale cultures of CHO-K1 and Ag8, respectively. Moreover, owing to the fact that the cell lines and culture media are specific, outcomes will be applicable for other clones derived from the same host cell lines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24357035     DOI: 10.1007/s11626-013-9717-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  27 in total

1.  Microsupport with two-dimensional geometry (2D-MS). In situ determination of the growth kinetics of anchorage-dependent cells by Laser Diffraction Particle Sizing (LDPS).

Authors:  N Kenda-Ropson; D Mention; V Motte; M Genlain; A O Miller
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Introduction to animal cell culture technology-past, present and future.

Authors:  O-W Merten
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 3.  Technological progresses in monoclonal antibody production systems.

Authors:  Maria Elisa Rodrigues; Ana Rita Costa; Mariana Henriques; Joana Azeredo; Rosário Oliveira
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

4.  Modulation of adhesive properties of DEAE-dextran with laminin.

Authors:  J Varani; S E Fligiel; D R Inman; T F Beals; W J Hillegas
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1995-08

5.  Metabolic activity and monoclonal antibody production of Salmonella enteritidis O and H antigen specific hybridoma cells in static culture.

Authors:  Ayse Nalbantsoy; Kerem Bora; Ismet Deliloglu-Gurhan
Journal:  Hybridoma (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-04

6.  Identification of an adhesion-associated protein of the retinal pigment epithelium.

Authors:  P G Chu; G B Grunwald
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Hybridoma cell growth and anti-neuroblastoma monoclonal antibody production in spinner flasks using a protein-free medium with microcarriers.

Authors:  A Voigt; F Zintl
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  1999-02-19       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Characterization of monoclonal antibodies to equine interleukin-10 and detection of T regulatory 1 cells in horses.

Authors:  Bettina Wagner; Julia M Hillegas; Danielle R Brinker; David W Horohov; Douglas F Antczak
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.046

9.  Proliferation, activity, and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells cultured on calcium titanium phosphate microspheres.

Authors:  Cristina C Barrias; Cristina C Ribeiro; Meriem Lamghari; Clara Sá Miranda; Mário A Barbosa
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Microsupport with Two-Dimensional Geometry (2D-MS).

Authors:  S Lenglois; M Moser; A O A Miller
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.058

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Role of the Microenvironment in Controlling the Fate of Bioprinted Stem Cells.

Authors:  Lauren N West-Livingston; Jihoon Park; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Cartilage by the Use of Stem Cells: A Strategy to Improve Regeneration.

Authors:  Livia Roseti; Carola Cavallo; Giovanna Desando; Valentina Parisi; Mauro Petretta; Isabella Bartolotti; Brunella Grigolo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.