Stacie Anne Deslich1, Timothy Thistlethwaite, Alberto Coustasse. 1. Master of Science in Healthcare Administration, Graduate School of Business at Marshall University in South Charleston, West Virginia. E-mail: deslich1@marshall.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It is unclear if telepsychiatry, a subset of telemedicine, increases access to mental health care for inmates in correctional facilities or decreases costs for clinicians or facility administrators. The purpose of this investigation was to determine how utilization of telepsychiatry affected access to care and costs of providing mental health care in correctional facilities. METHODS: A literature review complemented by a semistructured interview with a telepsychiatry practitioner. Five electronic databases, the National Bureau of Justice, and the American Psychiatric Association Web sites were searched for this research, and 49 sources were referenced. The literature review examined implementation of telepsychiatry in correctional facilities in Arizona, California, Georgia, Kansas, Ohio, Texas, and West Virginia to determine the effect of telepsychiatry on inmate access to mental health services and the costs of providing mental health care in correctional facilities. RESULTS: Telepsychiatry provided improved access to mental health services for inmates, and this increase in access is through the continuum of mental health care, which has been instrumental in increasing quality of care for inmates. Use of telepsychiatry saved correctional facilities from $12,000 to more than $1 million. The semistructured interview with the telepsychiatry practitioner supported utilization of telepsychiatry to increase access and lower costs of providing mental health care in correctional facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing access to mental health care for this underserved group through telepsychiatry may improve living conditions and safety inside correctional facilities. Providers, facilities, and state and federal governments can expect increased savings with utilization of telepsychiatry.
OBJECTIVE: It is unclear if telepsychiatry, a subset of telemedicine, increases access to mental health care for inmates in correctional facilities or decreases costs for clinicians or facility administrators. The purpose of this investigation was to determine how utilization of telepsychiatry affected access to care and costs of providing mental health care in correctional facilities. METHODS: A literature review complemented by a semistructured interview with a telepsychiatry practitioner. Five electronic databases, the National Bureau of Justice, and the American Psychiatric Association Web sites were searched for this research, and 49 sources were referenced. The literature review examined implementation of telepsychiatry in correctional facilities in Arizona, California, Georgia, Kansas, Ohio, Texas, and West Virginia to determine the effect of telepsychiatry on inmate access to mental health services and the costs of providing mental health care in correctional facilities. RESULTS: Telepsychiatry provided improved access to mental health services for inmates, and this increase in access is through the continuum of mental health care, which has been instrumental in increasing quality of care for inmates. Use of telepsychiatry saved correctional facilities from $12,000 to more than $1 million. The semistructured interview with the telepsychiatry practitioner supported utilization of telepsychiatry to increase access and lower costs of providing mental health care in correctional facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing access to mental health care for this underserved group through telepsychiatry may improve living conditions and safety inside correctional facilities. Providers, facilities, and state and federal governments can expect increased savings with utilization of telepsychiatry.
Authors: Donald M Hilty; Shayna L Marks; Doug Urness; Peter M Yellowlees; Thomas S Nesbitt Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Preethi Pansari Agarwal; Narayana Manjunatha; Guru S Gowda; M N Girish Kumar; Neelaveni Shanthaveeranna; Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar; Suresh Bada Math Journal: J Neurosci Rural Pract Date: 2019 Jan-Mar
Authors: Joshua R Wortzel; Brandon E Turner; Brannon T Weeks; Christopher Fragassi; Virginia Ramos; Thanh Truong; Desiree Li; Omar Sahak; Thomas G O'Connor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander I F Simpson; Cory Gerritsen; Margaret Maheandiran; Vito Adamo; Tobias Vogel; Lindsay Fulham; Tamsen Kitt; Andrew Forrester; Roland M Jones Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 4.157