Literature DB >> 23570218

Prison telemedicine and telehealth utilization in the United States: state and federal perceptions of benefits and barriers.

Debra Larsen1, B Hudnall Stamm, Kelly Davis, Phillip R Magaletta.   

Abstract

Although national justice and technology associations have endorsed the utilization of telemedicine and telehealth, little is known about the current utilization of this technology across our nation's correctional facilities. Several voluntary registries and state Web sites exist, but only limited information on telemedicine utilization may be gleaned from these. The purpose of the present study was to fill this void by reporting the utilization patterns in telemedicine programs in state and federal correctional facilities throughout the United States. Using telephone-administered interviews, data were collected from all 50 states. Respondents were asked about utilization, benefits, and barriers to the use of technology in healthcare in state and federal correctional facilities. Slightly over half of state correctional institutions and 39% of federal institutions are using some sort of telehealth or telemedicine applications. The most common benefits cited were improved security, personnel safety, costs savings, and access to specialists. The most common barriers cited were costs of technology, resistance from medical personnel, lack of staff technical expertise, and difficulties coordinating services.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 23570218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  6 in total

Review 1.  Telepsychiatry in correctional facilities: using technology to improve access and decrease costs of mental health care in underserved populations.

Authors:  Stacie Anne Deslich; Timothy Thistlethwaite; Alberto Coustasse
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

2.  Rural Re-entry and Opioid Use: Identifying Health-Related Predictors of Relapse Among Formerly Incarcerated Women in Appalachia.

Authors:  Joseph M Calvert; Megan F Dickson; Martha Tillson; Erika Pike; Michele Staton
Journal:  J Appalach Health       Date:  2021-07-25

3.  Adoption of telemedicine: from pilot stage to routine delivery.

Authors:  Paolo Zanaboni; Richard Wootton
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Digital store and forward imaging as a quality assessment tool for emergency plastic surgery consultations.

Authors:  Ian C Hoppe; Yoomie Lee; Mark S Granick; Sandra S Scott
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-01-07

5.  Telementoring of primary care providers delivering hepatitis C treatment in New York City: Results from Project INSPIRE.

Authors:  Paul A Teixeira; Marie P Bresnahan; Fabienne Laraque; Alain H Litwin; Shuchin J Shukla; Jonathan M Schwartz; Sheila Reynoso; Ponni V Perumalswami; Jeffrey M Weiss; Brooke Wyatt; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 6.  Challenges Associated with Parenting While Incarcerated: A Review.

Authors:  Monika Dargis; Arielle Mitchell-Somoza
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.