Literature DB >> 24355112

Left main coronary artery stenosis: a meta-analysis of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting.

Ganesh Athappan1, Eshan Patvardhan2, Murat E Tuzcu3, Stephen Ellis3, Patrick Whitlow3, Samir R Kapadia4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to provide a systematic review comparing the long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for unprotected left main coronary artery (UPLM) stenosis.
BACKGROUND: One-year outcomes from randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and pooled analyses have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of PCI of the UPLM when compared with CABG. However, there remain concerns over the sustainability of PCI with DES at longer follow-up.
METHODS: Studies published between January 2000 and December 2012 of PCI versus CABG for UPLM stenosis were identified using an electronic search and reviewed using meta-analytical techniques.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies comprising 14,203 patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference for all-cause mortality between PCI or CABG at 1 year (odds ratio [OR]: 0.792, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53 to 1.19), 2 years (OR: 0.920, 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.26), 3 years (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.48), 4 years (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.33), and 5 years (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.08). The need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) was significantly higher in patients undergoing PCI at all time points. The occurrence of stroke, however, was significantly less frequent in patients treated with PCI. The occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction showed a statistically significant trend towards a lower incidence in CABG patients at 1 year (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.05 to 2.50), 2 years (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.35), and 3 years (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.36 to 3.1). There was no significant difference in combined major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that PCI with DES is a safe and durable alternative to CABG for the revascularization of UPLM stenosis in select patients at long-term follow-up.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CABG; CI; DES; IVUS; MACCE; MI; OR; PCI; PCI with DES; RCT; SYNTAX score; TVR; UPLM; UPLMS; confidence interval; coronary artery bypass graft surgery; drug-eluting stent(s); intravascular ultrasound; long-term follow-up; major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event(s); myocardial infarction; odds ratio; percutaneous coronary intervention; randomized controlled trial; target vessel revascularization; unprotected left main coronary artery; unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24355112     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  25 in total

1.  Three-year efficacy and safety of new- versus early-generation drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease insights from the ISAR-LEFT MAIN and ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 trials.

Authors:  Salvatore Cassese; Sebastian Kufner; Erion Xhepa; Robert A Byrne; Johanna Kreutzer; Tareq Ibrahim; Klaus Tiroch; Marco Valgimigli; Ralph Tölg; Massimiliano Fusaro; Heribert Schunkert; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Julinda Mehilli; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Stenting or bypass surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery disease-still a long rally to go.

Authors:  Tzu-Hsien Tsai; Cheng-I Cheng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Stem Cell Homing: a Potential Therapeutic Strategy Unproven for Treatment of Myocardial Injury.

Authors:  Zhonghao Tao; Shihua Tan; Wen Chen; Xin Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Triaging patients with left main disease after the EXCEL and NOBLE trials: the everlasting saga of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Davide Capodanno
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main revascularization: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Nirav Patel; Rajat Kalra; Peter Marogil; Ashwanikumar Bhardwaj; Garima Arora; Pankaj Arora
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2017-07-01

6.  Unprotected Left Main Disease: Indications and Optimal Strategies for Percutaneous Intervention.

Authors:  Jun Li; Sandeep M Patel; Manish A Parikh; Sahil A Parikh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-03

7.  Compression of the ostium of left main coronary artery caused by aortic root intramural hematoma after blunt thoracic trauma.

Authors:  Hua Wang; Lingyun Jiang; Li Zhang; Hongming Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

8.  Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Javier A Valle; Hector Tamez; J Dawn Abbott; Issam D Moussa; John C Messenger; Stephen W Waldo; Kevin F Kennedy; Frederick A Masoudi; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

9.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Giacoppo; Roisin Colleran; Salvatore Cassese; Antonio H Frangieh; Jens Wiebe; Michael Joner; Heribert Schunkert; Adnan Kastrati; Robert A Byrne
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease - A Single Hospital Experience without On-Site Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yang Cheng; Kuang-Te Wang; Wen-Hsiung Lin; Jui-Peng Tsai; Yung-Tzi Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.