Javier A Valle1,2, Hector Tamez3, J Dawn Abbott4, Issam D Moussa5, John C Messenger2, Stephen W Waldo1,2, Kevin F Kennedy6, Frederick A Masoudi2, Robert W Yeh3. 1. Rocky Mountain Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado. 2. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora. 3. Richard and Susan Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 5. Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 6. Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, Missouri.
Abstract
Importance: Recent data support percutaneous revascularization as an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main (ULM) coronary lesions. However, the relevance of these trials to current practice is unclear, as patterns and outcomes of ULM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary US clinical practice are not well studied. Objective: To define the current practice of ULM PCI and its outcomes and compare these with findings reported in clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional multicenter analysis included data collected from 1662 institutions participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI Registry between April 2009 and July 2016. Data were collected from 33 128 patients undergoing ULM PCI and 3 309 034 patients undergoing all other PCI. Data were analyzed from June 2017 to May 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient and procedural characteristics and their temporal trends were compared between ULM PCI and all other PCI. In-hospital major adverse clinical events (ie, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting) were compared using hierarchical logistic regression. Characteristics and outcomes were also compared against clinical trial cohorts. Results: Of the 3 342 162 included patients, 2 223 570 (66.5%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 64.2 (12.1) years. Unprotected left main PCI represented 1.0% (33 128 of 3 342 162) of all procedures, modestly increasing from 0.7% to 1.3% over time. The mean (SD) annualized ULM PCI volume was 0.5 (1.5) procedures for operators and 3.2 (6.1) procedures for facilities, with only 1808 of 10 971 operators (16.5%) and 892 of 1662 facilities (53.7%) performing an average of 1 or more ULM PCI annually. After adjustment, major adverse clinical events occurred more frequently with ULM PCI compared with all other PCI (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.39-1.53). Compared with clinical trial populations, patients in the CathPCI Registry were older with more comorbid conditions, and adverse events were more frequent. Conclusions and Relevance: Use of ULM PCI has increased over time, but overall use remains low. These findings suggest that ULM PCI occurs infrequently in the United States and in an older and more comorbid population than that seen in clinical trials.
Importance: Recent data support percutaneous revascularization as an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main (ULM) coronary lesions. However, the relevance of these trials to current practice is unclear, as patterns and outcomes of ULM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary US clinical practice are not well studied. Objective: To define the current practice of ULM PCI and its outcomes and compare these with findings reported in clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional multicenter analysis included data collected from 1662 institutions participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI Registry between April 2009 and July 2016. Data were collected from 33 128 patients undergoing ULM PCI and 3 309 034 patients undergoing all other PCI. Data were analyzed from June 2017 to May 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient and procedural characteristics and their temporal trends were compared between ULM PCI and all other PCI. In-hospital major adverse clinical events (ie, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting) were compared using hierarchical logistic regression. Characteristics and outcomes were also compared against clinical trial cohorts. Results: Of the 3 342 162 included patients, 2 223 570 (66.5%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 64.2 (12.1) years. Unprotected left main PCI represented 1.0% (33 128 of 3 342 162) of all procedures, modestly increasing from 0.7% to 1.3% over time. The mean (SD) annualized ULM PCI volume was 0.5 (1.5) procedures for operators and 3.2 (6.1) procedures for facilities, with only 1808 of 10 971 operators (16.5%) and 892 of 1662 facilities (53.7%) performing an average of 1 or more ULM PCI annually. After adjustment, major adverse clinical events occurred more frequently with ULM PCI compared with all other PCI (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.39-1.53). Compared with clinical trial populations, patients in the CathPCI Registry were older with more comorbid conditions, and adverse events were more frequent. Conclusions and Relevance: Use of ULM PCI has increased over time, but overall use remains low. These findings suggest that ULM PCI occurs infrequently in the United States and in an older and more comorbid population than that seen in clinical trials.
Authors: R G Brindis; S Fitzgerald; H V Anderson; R E Shaw; W S Weintraub; J F Williams Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Timo Mäkikallio; Niels R Holm; Mitchell Lindsay; Mark S Spence; Andrejs Erglis; Ian B A Menown; Thor Trovik; Markku Eskola; Hannu Romppanen; Thomas Kellerth; Jan Ravkilde; Lisette O Jensen; Gintaras Kalinauskas; Rikard B A Linder; Markku Pentikainen; Anders Hervold; Adrian Banning; Azfar Zaman; Jamen Cotton; Erlend Eriksen; Sulev Margus; Henrik T Sørensen; Per H Nielsen; Matti Niemelä; Kari Kervinen; Jens F Lassen; Michael Maeng; Keith Oldroyd; Geoff Berg; Simon J Walsh; Colm G Hanratty; Indulis Kumsars; Peteris Stradins; Terje K Steigen; Ole Fröbert; Alastair N J Graham; Petter C Endresen; Matthias Corbascio; Olli Kajander; Uday Trivedi; Juha Hartikainen; Vesa Anttila; David Hildick-Smith; Leif Thuesen; Evald H Christiansen Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: John C Messenger; Kalon K L Ho; Christopher H Young; Lara E Slattery; Jasmine C Draoui; Jeptha P Curtis; Gregory J Dehmer; Frederick L Grover; Michael J Mirro; Matthew R Reynolds; Ivan C Rokos; John A Spertus; Tracy Y Wang; Stuart A Winston; John S Rumsfeld; Frederick A Masoudi Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-09-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael Ragosta; Sandra Dee; Ian J Sarembock; Lewis C Lipson; Lawrence W Gimple; Eric R Powers Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Eric D Peterson; David Dai; Elizabeth R DeLong; J Matthew Brennan; Mandeep Singh; Sunil V Rao; Richard E Shaw; Matthew T Roe; Kalon K L Ho; Lloyd W Klein; Ronald J Krone; William S Weintraub; Ralph G Brindis; John S Rumsfeld; John A Spertus Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Stephan D Fihn; James C Blankenship; Karen P Alexander; John A Bittl; John G Byrne; Barbara J Fletcher; Gregg C Fonarow; Richard A Lange; Glenn N Levine; Thomas M Maddox; Srihari S Naidu; E Magnus Ohman; Peter K Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Joseph F Sabik; Patrick W Serruys; Charles A Simonton; Philippe Généreux; John Puskas; David E Kandzari; Marie-Claude Morice; Nicholas Lembo; W Morris Brown; David P Taggart; Adrian Banning; Béla Merkely; Ferenc Horkay; Piet W Boonstra; Ad J van Boven; Imre Ungi; Gabor Bogáts; Samer Mansour; Nicolas Noiseux; Manel Sabaté; José Pomar; Mark Hickey; Anthony Gershlick; Pawel Buszman; Andrzej Bochenek; Erick Schampaert; Pierre Pagé; Ovidiu Dressler; Ioanna Kosmidou; Roxana Mehran; Stuart J Pocock; A Pieter Kappetein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Matthew Brennan; David Dai; Manesh R Patel; Sunil V Rao; Ehrin J Armstrong; John C Messenger; Jeptha P Curtis; Kendrick A Shunk; Kevin J Anstrom; Eric L Eisenstein; William S Weintraub; Eric D Peterson; Pamela S Douglas; William B Hillegass Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Patrick W Serruys; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Elisabeth Ståhle; Ted E Feldman; Marcel van den Brand; Eric J Bass; Nic Van Dyck; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Harsha S Nagarajarao; Chandra P Ojha; Venkatachalam Mulukutla; Ahmed Ibrahim; Adriana C Mares; Timir K Paul Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Christopher P Kovach; Annika Hebbe; Anna E Barón; Aaron Strobel; Mary E Plomondon; Javier A Valle; Stephen W Waldo Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Mark Kheifets; Shelly Abigail Vons; Tamir Bental; Hana Vaknin-Assa; Gabriel Greenberg; Abed Samara; Pablo Codner; Guy Wittberg; Yeela Talmor Barkan; Leor Perl; Ran Kornowski; Amos Levi Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Mandeep Singh; Rajiv Gulati; John M Stulak; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-06-05