Literature DB >> 24353440

Daily baseline skin care in the prevention, treatment, and supportive care of skin toxicity in oncology patients: recommendations from a multinational expert panel.

René-Jean Bensadoun1, Phillipe Humbert2, Jean Krutman3, Thomas Luger4, Raoul Triller5, André Rougier6, Sophie Seite6, Brigitte Dreno7.   

Abstract

Skin reactions due to radiotherapy and chemotherapy are a significant problem for an important number of cancer patients. While effective for treating cancer, they disturb cutaneous barrier function, causing a reaction soon after initiation of treatment that impacts patient quality of life. Managing these symptoms with cosmetics and nonpharmaceutical skin care products for camouflage or personal hygiene may be important for increasing patient self-esteem. However, inappropriate product choice or use could worsen side effects. Although recommendations exist for the pharmaceutical treatment of skin reactions, there are no recommendations for the choice or use of dermatologic skin care products for oncology patients. The present guidelines were developed by a board of European experts in dermatology and oncology to provide cancer care professionals with guidance for the appropriate use of non-pharmaceutical, dermocosmetic skin care management of cutaneous toxicities associated with radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy, including epidermal growth factor inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. The experts hope that these recommendations will improve the management of cutaneous side effects and hence quality of life for oncology patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; chemotherapy; consensus; cosmetic; dermatological toxicity; folliculitis; radiotherapy; skin care; supportive care; xerosis

Year:  2013        PMID: 24353440      PMCID: PMC3862511          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S52256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


Introduction

Systemic cancer therapy, and radiotherapy, or a combination thereof, has improved the management of many malignancies as well as patient survival rates. However, they are also associated with uncomfortable and disfiguring cutaneous reactions, which continue to be an important issue for both patients and treating physicians.1,2 Therefore, preventing and managing these reactions is becoming increasingly important.3 Adverse cutaneous reactions associated with radiotherapy or chemotherapeutic agents are comprehensively described in the literature. Hair and nails may be affected, causing alopecia, paronychia, and other abnormalities. Skin barrier function may also be disturbed, resulting in folliculitis (skin rash), xerosis, pruritus, hyperpigmentation, and hand and foot erythema. Additionally, the skin becomes more sensitive to allergens and prone to infection, and becomes more sensitive to ultraviolet radiation.2,4–8 The exact mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology are only partly understood.4 Radiotherapy causes a variety of side effects, commonly referred to as radiodermatitis. One of the most common acute skin reactions, radiodermatitis can range from mild erythema to severe confluent moist desquamation. All patients receiving radiotherapy are at risk of developing these reactions. Therefore, early assessment and management promotes patient comfort and enhances quality of life.9–11 Combining radiotherapy and systemic therapy may exacerbate cutaneous reactions, resulting in severe xerosis, inflammation, skin thinning, and necrosis of the upper dermis and epidermis.12 Side effects tend to appear early on, and although mostly mild at onset, can become severe and significantly impair quality of life.6 These reactions may lead to dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy, which could be detrimental to the outcome of treatment.13 Given that disturbances of barrier function are common to all treatments, close and prompt collaboration between oncologists and dermatologists would ensure the best decisions are made for patients, with the objective of managing adverse cutaneous reactions from the start of treatment to minimize therapy changes.14–17 Several publications provide recommendations or algorithms for pharmaceutical treatment, but skin care itself remains unclear.3,10,12,18,19 Therefore, the authors intend to provide further support for the choice of nonpharmaceutical skin care and cosmetic products for all cancer treatment regimens. This paper is intended to provide oncology health care professionals with recommendations for the most adequate use of nonpharmaceutical skin care products to more effectively prevent and manage skin toxicity and to improve quality of life for cancer patients.

Literature review

These recommendations are based on an extensive literature review of skin toxicity and use of cosmetics and nonpharmaceutical skin care products adjunctive to current cancer treatments. The authors have focused on skin, mucosal, and nail disorders following oncology treatments as well as on conclusions reached during an expert meeting of six independent European dermatologists and one oncologist held in November 2011. An extensive literature review using PubMed and BIOSIS was performed. Search terms chosen were: “emollient + cancer + skin + quality of life”, “sunscreen + cancer + skin”, “hygiene + cancer”, “make-up + cancer”, “radiotherapy + skin toxicity”, “standard chemotherapy + skin toxicity”, and “targeted therapy + skin toxicity”. During the meeting, the literature concerning different skin toxicities related to targeted chemotherapy and radiotherapy as well as quality of life during oncology therapy was reviewed. Unfortunately, to date, evidence-based support for the adjunctive use of skin care products in oncology therapy remains scarce. Practice is mainly based on anecdotal reports or studies with limited controls. Therefore, the expert group discussed appropriate dermocosmetic skin care products for a certain number of cutaneous reactions, and completed their recommendations with current practice and personal experience.

Definitions

Dermocosmetic skin care was defined by the expert panel as personal hygiene, cleansing, moisturizing, and photoprotection using nonpharmaceutical or cosmetic products. These products should have been tested clinically in patients with skin diseases and demonstrated a good tolerance profile. Systemic therapy, for the purposes of this paper, refers to key cytotoxic agents such as alkylating agents, antimetabolites, anthracyclines, and topoisomerase inhibitors. Systemic therapy also includes targeted (biologic) therapy or immunotherapy.18,20,21 Radiotherapy refers to therapy using high-energy radiation to reduce tumors and destroy cancer cells including X-rays, gamma rays, and charged particles. Supportive care addresses the emotional, physical, and practical issues of cancer,20 as opposed to palliative care, defined by the National Cancer Institute as comfort care given to a patient with a serious or life-threatening disease, such as cancer, at diagnosis and throughout the course of illness. To date, different classifications for degrees of skin toxicity exist. The working group referred to The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 4, a known and accepted scale for assessment of adverse events.7 The expert panel considers that this scale provides objective criteria that enhance the current management of toxicity associated with cancer therapy.

Radiation dermatitis

Radiation dermatitis may arise in any patient undergoing external beam radiation. It may cause several acute skin reactions including pain, discomfort, irritation, itching, and burning. The majority of clinical trials on supportive care for radiation dermatitis were conducted in patients with brain, breast, head and neck, soft tissue, perineal, and anal canal cancers. A British study demonstrated that dry or moist desquamation was the most common adverse reaction reported after radiation, with 52% of radiation therapy centers reporting dry desquamation and 85% reporting moist desquamation as an occasional event. Skin care during radiotherapy is controversial, given that the assessment and management of adverse reactions differs considerably between institutions and often also between individual practitioners. This is possibly due to a lack of evidenced-based studies.20 Inconsistent communication between practitioners may lead to patients receiving conflicting or even erroneous information. Areas where opinions differ include use of washing soaps, creams, and deodorants and in the management of dry and moist desquamation, saline soaks, gel or occlusive dressings, and topical antibiotics. Restrictive skin care practices that interfere with normal hygiene can be very distressing for the patient, making them feel socially unacceptable at a time when social support is very important.7 Social support from family, friends, and health care professionals is vital for healthy and adaptive adjustment to a cancer diagnosis. Bolderston et al reported that the risk of dry and moist desquamation should not increase if skin care products are applied between treatments and that there is no significant bolus effect with normal use of such products when using modern megavoltage radiation therapy equipment.8 Bernier et al suggest that patients should be encouraged to maintain good hygiene standards and to wash with pH-neutral synthetic cleansers. Nonperfumed moisturizers can be used between treatments. If anti-infective measures are considered appropriate, an emollient containing an antiseptic can be used occasionally.12 Kumar et al, in their review of radiation therapy management, also recommend bathing with mild soaps.20 The objective when managing dry desquamation is to alleviate discomfort, providing that there is no skin breakdown and no potential for infection. Skin hydration has been recommended to relieve symptoms of dry skin and to reduce further aggravation associated with pruritus that leads to secondary infection.22 The opposite is true for moist desquamation, in that the skin breaks down and becomes susceptible to infection, for which antibacterial or antifungal medication is currently prescribed.12

Cutaneous effects of systemic chemotherapy

Rash

Rash (folliculitis) is the most common reaction to systemic therapy, occurring in 43%–85% of patients treated with targeted chemotherapy.1,23 Rash follows a typical chronologic pattern that peaks in severity during the first 1–2 weeks of treatment.2,24 Although it is not associated with death, there have been reports of serious morbidity.19 Over-the-counter acne products, including formulations containing benzoyl peroxide and topical retinoids such as tretinoin, adapalene, or tazarotene, have not been shown to be useful because they dry the skin and may cause burning, stinging, and irritation without being beneficial in treating rash.3,5,23 Segaert et al suggest using oil-in-water creams and avoiding treatments with vehicles containing alcohol when treating rash.2 Grade 1 rash has been successfully managed with emollients and adapted skin cleansers or topical antibiotics and antiseptic soap.19,25 In the current absence of consistent clinical trials in subjects with more severe rash, patients are advised to use mild skin care and photoprotection.5 Nonocclusive make-up with a high pigment concentration to adequately cover scars and lesions has been consistently recommended to cover grade 1 and 2 rash.3,26 Patients should avoid allergenic over-the-counter products. Make-up should be removed with a dermatologist-approved, low-irritant, nonalcohol-based hypoallergenic remover.26,27

Xerosis cutis

Xerosis is a common side effect of systemic therapy, appearing several weeks after treatment in up to 35% of patients.5,28 When aggravated, asteatotic eczema can occur, which can become complicated by secondary Staphylococcus aureus or Herpes simplex infection. Xerosis cutis and subsequent eczema are often correlated with older age and a tendency towards atopy. If dry skin appears on the hands or feet, patients may develop painful toes and fingertips (pulpitis sicca) or fissures on the dorsal sides of the interphalangeal joints.28 Some publications recommend educating patients on preventative measures prior to any therapy, including avoiding soaps, limiting shower time, using lukewarm water, and frequent use of emollients. Further, they suggest treating xerosis cutis with standard emollients, such as 5%–10% urea in cetomacrogol cream.5,9,29 Ointments should be avoided because they may lead to follicular occlusion and folliculitis. Eczema should be treated intermittently with a moderate to potent corticosteroid over several weeks. Pulpitis should be treated with frequently applied emollients, in combination with moderate corticosteroids if needed. One pilot study of 13 patients found that proactive application of an emollient containing niacinamide reduced the frequency of adverse events and maintained quality of life.30 Beyond proactive application of emollients when treating moderate to severe xerosis, one author also suggests switching to topical medication with oil-in-water vehicles, and for the limbs, water-in-oil formulations may be considered.24 A more complete approach includes hydration of the stratum corneum associated with prophylactic use of an acidic (pH 5.5) skin care system (emollient and cleanser), ie, specifically formulated hand and foot emollients, liquid bandages, thick emollients containing 5%–10% urea for fissures, and use of antiseptic creams to prevent infection.6,19

Skin photosensitivity

Skin toxicities such as rash and xerosis can be exacerbated by sun exposure.18,31,32 The skin becomes more sensitive to ultraviolet radiation, and in certain cases, sunlight can cause pigmentation changes.33,34 Symptom management and supportive care forums on dermatologic toxicity management recommend applying a broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF 15 or higher with a UVA-PF) particularly for lighter skin types and the expected level of induced photosensitivity.9,27

Paronychia

Paronychia is a painful inflammatory reaction of the nail folds.28,36 It is difficult to treat and may cause infection. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors often cause paronychia, although the pathogenesis remains speculative. Preventative measures include wearing wide fitting shoes, adequate nail care, hygiene to prevent secondary impetiginization, and use of local antiseptics and antibiotic creams.2,24,26 Nail removal or coagulation of granulation tissue can be considered for very painful nail disorders resistant to therapy. Nail growth is frequently retarded and the nails can become brittle. These nail disorders do not require therapy. Application of nail polish to harden the nails, liquid bandages, and glue has been used to prevent nail fragmentation.28

Hand-foot syndrome

Hand-foot syndrome is the most severe side effect, and is associated with capecitabine and other 5-fluorouracil derivatives in particular. To date, the pathophysiology of hand-foot syndrome has not been fully characterized. Involvement of the epidermis of the palms and soles, accompanied by damage to the epithelial cells of the eccrine ducts, suggests that this syndrome may involve more than a direct toxic effect on basal keratinocytes.37,40 Early recognition of hand-foot syndrome toxicity is important because it can progress quickly to higher grades of toxicity with debilitating consequences.38 Mild reactions have been treated successfully with urea or salicylic acid ointment.24,25 Careful attention should be paid to superficial cuts or scrapes to prevent infection.39

Changes in patient quality of life

The pain and morbidity associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can be difficult for patients to bear because skin changes and nail problems are particularly visible. The use of cosmetics may therefore significantly improve self-image and decrease anxiety.15 Early education and continued encouragement throughout treatment regarding use of cosmetics and management of side effects contributes significantly to better management of symptoms.40–42 Training seminars that teach both men and women appropriate skin care, camouflage, and dressing techniques, have been successful in restoring self-esteem, particularly in those with pre-existing low esteem.43,44 Hence, use of adequate cosmetics and appropriate skin care management may definitively improve quality of life.

Currently proposed cosmetics and skin care procedures

Expert point of view

The present point of view focuses on a preventative and supportive skin care approach to assist patients undergoing oncology treatment and their caregivers to choose the most suitable products for daily skin care. Based on the literature and personal experience, the experts consider that all anticancer therapy-related cutaneous adverse events are linked to skin barrier dysfunction. Hence, maintaining skin barrier function using appropriate skin care products may control the severity of these symptoms. Toxicity arises early after the first treatment, and there is no clear evidence regarding which patients may be susceptible,9,19,24,45 although a correlation between older age, atopic predisposition, and a higher incidence of xerosis has been reported.27

Cosmetics

Advising patients regarding choice of the most appropriate cosmetic to be used during and after their cancer treatment is another important issue. A number of cosmetic products are formulated for and clinically tested on fragile, diseased, and sensitive skin, and so may be more appropriate in this patient population.

Skin cleansing

Skin cleansing advice is important. Many hygiene products can aggravate symptoms.46,47 The cleansing process removes both sebum and impurities, thus further drying damaged skin.48 This is particularly detrimental to skin affected by chemotherapy and radiotherapy where the skin barrier is already disturbed.10,12,13 Without professional guidance, patients tend to experiment with inappropriate self-care products that aggravate the situation and irritate their sensitive skin.15 Combination of an acidic cleanser and emollient (pH 5.5) and use of an antiseptic soap has been reported to improve barrier function, hydration of the stratum corneum, and skin surface lipids.25 Use of pH-neutral soaps is preferred. Therefore, washing with appropriate and preferably clinically tested cleansers is recommended.

Skin hydration

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy reduce the skin’s tolerance to cosmetic products, and this has been attributed to an imbalance in the stratum corneum, which ultimately disrupts skin barrier function.13,47 Adequate hydration improves barrier function, reduces pruritus, and prevents secondary infection due to scratching.15 Emollients repair and protect the epidermal barrier by binding water within the stratum corneum and providing partial surface hydration, and thereby improving epidermal barrier function. This limits the stinging, scaling, redness, and cracks associated with radiotherapy-induced and chemotherapy-induced xerosis.12 Thus, skin care with clinically tested moisturizers improves barrier function and skin hydration to manage cutaneous reactions prior to, during, and after oncology therapy.

Photoprotection

Daily photoprotection is important in preventing pigmentation changes occurring as a result of heightened ultraviolet sensitivity.33,34 Symptom management and supportive care forums on dermatologic toxicity management recommend applying a broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF 15 or higher with a UVA-PF) according to phototype and extent of photosensitivity induced.12,26

Use of deodorants

Use of antiperspirants and deodorants is a controversial, given that the effect of chemotherapy on the eccrine glands eliminates the need to use these products. However, the experts feel that in the interests of patient well-being, deodorants and nonirritant perfumes may be used as part of maintaining a daily routine.

General recommendations

The present recommendations for use of dermocosmetic skin care and cosmetic products are intended to improve the management of cutaneous side effects and enhance quality of life in oncology patients. Patients should receive adequate information about dermocosmetic skin care and cosmetic products as well as education on their appropriate use from the beginning of their oncology treatment. This should be continued and encouraged throughout and after treatment. When symptoms occur, they should be evaluated throughout therapy, and topical or systemic treatments may be added if necessary, according to existing guidelines. Dermatology referral should be considered when symptoms worsen (see Figure 1).
Figure 1

Proposed algorithm for management of skin adverse events associated with oncology therapies.

Hence, based on the above discussion, the experts propose the following general recommendations for basic skin care (see Table 1):
Table 1

Adjunctive dermocosmetics for the management of skin reactions due to radiation or systemic therapy

Toxic effectPreventative skin care productsHazardous skin care products
Radiation dermatitisGentle cleansers12,20Photoprotection12Apply moisturizers to relieve itching12Antibacterial moisturizers12
RashGentle skin cleansers19Proactive emollient applicationPhotoprotection18,26,31Nonocclusive make-up3,26,27Potentially allergenic products3Over-the-counter acne treatments: benzoyl peroxide, tretinoin, tazarotene, adapalene3,25,26
XerosisGentle (pH 5.5) skin cleansers19Frequent emollient application28Photoprotection26Emollients containing 5%–10% urea28,30Antiseptic creams for fissures12,19Oil-in-water-vehicle for topical medication24Soaps28Ointments28
ParonychiaLocal antiseptics2,26Liquid bandages or glue for nail splitting28
Hand and footUrea or salicylic acid ointment2,25
Continue gentle skin cleansing. Synthetic detergents (syndets), clinically tested and with a pH of 5.5, are generally well tolerated and suitable for daily use. Apply a noncomedogenic moisturizing cream on both the face and body daily, from the first treatment, irrespective of whether this is chemotherapeutic or radiotherapeutic. Avoid daily application of body lotion during treatment with lipophilic chemotherapeutic agents. Apply broad-spectrum sunscreen to the face and other exposed areas, ie, neck and arms (SPF 15 with a UVA-PF) according to phototype or expected photosensitivity. Consider oil-in-water vehicles for medical treatment and emollients containing humectants such as urea 5%–10% or niacinamide. Apply noncomedogenic make-up to cover erythema and mask pallor, and avoid occlusive make-up if folliculitis is severe. Fruit acids, antibacterials, and benzoyl peroxide are not helpful for treating rash, may cause irritation, and can be harmful. Antiseptics and wound healing creams may be helpful in managing fissures and paronychia.
  47 in total

1.  Acneiform eruption induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in patients with solid tumours.

Authors:  W Jacot; D Bessis; E Jorda; M Ychou; M Fabbro; J-L Pujol; B Guillot
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 2.  Managing treatment side effects in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Susan Moore
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 3.  Novel approaches to radiotherapy-induced skin reactions: a literature review.

Authors:  Wendy Maddocks-Jennings; Jenny M Wilkinson; David Shillington
Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.446

Review 4.  Dermatologic side effects associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.

Authors:  Anna Liza C Agero; Stephen W Dusza; Cristiane Benvenuto-Andrade; Klaus J Busam; Patricia Myskowski; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 5.  Cutaneous side effects of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and management.

Authors:  Jenny C Hu; Parrish Sadeghi; Lauren C Pinter-Brown; Sharona Yashar; Melvin W Chiu
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Description and management of cutaneous side effects during cetuximab or erlotinib treatments: a prospective study of 30 patients.

Authors:  Esther Roé; María Pilar García Muret; Eugenio Marcuello; Jaume Capdevila; Cinta Pallarés; Agustín Alomar
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 7.  HER1/EGFR inhibitor-associated rash: future directions for management and investigation outcomes from the HER1/EGFR inhibitor rash management forum.

Authors:  Román Pérez-Soler; Jean Pierre Delord; Allan Halpern; Karen Kelly; James Krueger; Bartomeu Massutí Sureda; Joachim von Pawel; Jennifer Temel; Salvatore Siena; Denis Soulières; Leonard Saltz; James Leyden
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2005-05

Review 8.  Acute and chronic paronychia.

Authors:  Dimitris Rigopoulos; George Larios; Stamatis Gregoriou; Alevizos Alevizos
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 9.  Coming to grips with hand-foot syndrome. Insights from clinical trials evaluating capecitabine.

Authors:  Werner Scheithauer; Joanne Blum
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.990

10.  Consensus guidelines for the management of radiation dermatitis and coexisting acne-like rash in patients receiving radiotherapy plus EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  J Bernier; J Bonner; J B Vermorken; R-J Bensadoun; R Dummer; J Giralt; G Kornek; A Hartley; R Mesia; C Robert; S Segaert; K K Ang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Supportive oncodermatology-a narrative review of its utility and the way forward.

Authors:  Valencia Long; Ellie Ci-En Choi; Chris Lixian Tan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  EGFRI-associated health-related quality of life by severity of skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor target therapy.

Authors:  Sui-Whi Jane; Shu-Ching Chen; Ting-Yu Chiang; Hung-Chih Hsu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Topical interventions to prevent acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elaine Barros Ferreira; Christiane Inocêncio Vasques; Rafael Gadia; Raymond Javan Chan; Eliete Neves Silva Guerra; Luis André Mezzomo; Graziela De Luca Canto; Paula Elaine Diniz Dos Reis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Interest of Supportive and Barrier Protective Skin Care Products in the Daily Prevention and Treatment of Cutaneous Toxicity During Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Antoine Berger; Carlos Regueiro; Tarek Hijal; David Pasquier; Cristina De La Fuente; Florence Le Tinier; Bernard Coche-Dequeant; Eric Lartigau; Dominique Moyal; Sophie Seité; René-Jean Bensadoun
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2018-01-23

5.  Prevention and treatment of acute and chronic radiodermatitis.

Authors:  Sophie Seité; René-Jean Bensadoun; Jean-Michel Mazer
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-11-02

6.  Evaluation of supportive and barrier-protective skin care products in the daily prevention and treatment of cutaneous toxicity during systemic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Diana Lüftner; Veronica Dell'Acqua; Frédéric Selle; Ahmed Khalil; Maria Cristina Leonardi; Alejandro De La Torre Tomás; George Shenouda; Jesus Romero Fernandez; Roberto Orecchia; Dominique Moyal; Sophie Seité
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Microbiome in healthy skin, update for dermatologists.

Authors:  B Dréno; E Araviiskaia; E Berardesca; G Gontijo; M Sanchez Viera; L F Xiang; R Martin; T Bieber
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 8.  Interplay Between the Host, the Human Microbiome, and Drug Metabolism.

Authors:  Robert G Nichols; Jeffrey M Peters; Andrew D Patterson
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.639

9.  A technical appraisal of guidelines for the management of skin rash in patients on chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

Authors:  Fangyuan Zhang; Sumei Lv; Yating Feng; Xuan Yang; Wanmin Qiang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  A National Survey of Medical Oncologist's Opinions and Perceptions for Managing Rash Among mCRC Patients Treated with Panitumumab.

Authors:  Kimberly A Lowe; Laura Sangaré; Rachel Bergstresser; Michelle McNamara; George Kafatos; Tamer Garawin
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2019-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.