Literature DB >> 24352017

Total synthesis of six 3,4-unsubstituted coumarins.

Wenqing Gao, Qingyong Li1, Jian Chen, Zhichao Wang, Changlong Hua.   

Abstract

In this article we describe a new methodology for the total synthesis of 3,4-unsubstituted coumarins from commercially available starting materials. Six examples were prepared, including five naturally occurring coumarins--7-hydroxy-6,8-dimethoxy-coumarin (isofraxidin), 7-hydroxy-6-methoxycoumarin (scopoletin), 6,7,8-trimethoxy-coumarin, 6,7-dimethoxycoumarin (scoparone), and 7,8-dihydroxycoumarin (daphnetin) and one synthetic coumarin, 7-hydroxy-6-ethoxycoumarin. Moreover, five important o-hydroxybenzaldehyde intermediates were also obtained, namely 2,4-dihydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde, 2,4-dihydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde, 5-ethoxy-2,4-dihydroxy-benzaldehyde, 2-hydroxy-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde, and 2-hydroxy-4,5-dimethoxy-benzaldehyde. The method developed herein involves just three or four steps and allows for the rapid synthesis of these important molecules in excellent yields. This is the first synthesis of 6,7,8-trimethoxycoumarin and 7-hydroxy-6-ethoxycoumarin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24352017      PMCID: PMC6269861          DOI: 10.3390/molecules181215613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

Coumarins (2H-1-chromene-2-ones) are abundant in Nature and are common motifs found in drugs, dyes, spices, and agricultural chemicals. In particular, 3,4-unsubstituted coumarins are the most common naturally occurring coumarins, which show potential antimalarial [1], antioxidant [2,3,4,5,6], antimicrobial [7], anti-inflammatory [8], and antitumor [9,10,11] activity, however, their abundance in plants is very low and the purification processes are complex. Therefore, various methods have been developed for the total synthesis of coumarins [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], including the Perkin [23], Pechmann [24], and Knoevenagel reactions [25]. These reactions mostly lead to coumarins with substituents at the 3- or 4-position. A one-pot Wittig reaction/cyclization has been adopted by de Kimpe for the synthesis of 3,4-unsubstituted coumarins [26]. Herein, we report the highly efficient total synthesis of five naturally occurring coumarins, as well as a synthetic 3,4-unsubstituted coumarin (Figure 1). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the total synthesis of coumarins 3 and 4.
Figure 1

The structure of the synthesized coumarins.

The structure of the synthesized coumarins.

2. Results and Discussion

Coumarins 1, 2, and 3 were synthesized from simple starting materials (Scheme 1). The hydroxyl group was protected using pivaloyl chloride [27] to give the corresponding products in 100% yield. These compounds were then iodinated in 80%, 77%, 80% yields, respectively, using N-iodo-succinimide [28,29], followed by hydrolysis using cuprous oxide, pyridine-2-aldoxime, tetrabutylammonium bromide, and cesium hydroxide [30]. The resulting o-hydroxybenzaldehydes were finally reacted with ethyl (triphenylphosphoranylidene) acetate in N,N-diethylaniline, forming coumarins 1, 2, and 3 as described above [26].
Scheme 1

Syntheses of coumarins 1, 2, and 3.

Syntheses of coumarins 1, 2, and 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) (CH3)3COCl, DMAP, Et3N, CH2Cl2; (b) 10 NIS, CF3COOH, CH3CN, reflux; 11,12 N-iodosuccinimide (NIS), CF3SO3H, MeOH; (c) CsOH, syn-2-pyridinealdoxime, Cu2O, Bu4NBr, N2, H2O; (d) (C6H5)3P=CHCOOCH2CH3, Et2NPh, N2, reflux. It was envisaged that this method could be applied to the synthesis of 6,7-dimethoxy-8-hydroxycoumarin (34) and 5,6,7,8-tetrahydroxycoumarin (35) (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2

Attempted syntheses of coumarins 34, 35.

Attempted syntheses of coumarins 34, 35. Reagents and conditions: (a) 26 (CH3)3COCl, DMAP, Et3N, CH2Cl2; 27 MeSO4, K2CO3, CH3CN; (b) 28 NIS, CF3COOH, CH3CN, reflux; 29 NIS, CF3SO3H, MeOH; (c) CsOH, syn-2-pyridinealdoxime, Cu2O, Bu4NBr, N2, H2O. Protection of the hydroxyl groups using pivaloyl chloride and iodination of the resulting compounds proceeded as expected, but hydrolysis of the iodo-compounds 30 and 31 failed to afford the desired products 32 and 33. It was presumed that both electronic effects and steric hindrance of the three methoxy groups and the hydroxyl group at the ortho position of 30 and 31 affected the success of these reactions. Synthesis of coumarins 4 and 5 (Scheme 3) began with the iodination of 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde (19) and veratraldehyde (20), respectively, both in 99% yield. Hydrolysis of 2-iodo-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde (21) and 2-iodo-4,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (22) afforded 2-hydroxy-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde (23) and 2-hydroxy-4,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (24) in 83% and 85% yield, respectively. Finally, the o-hydroxybenzaldehydes 23 and 24 were converted to the corresponding coumarins 4 and 5. The overall yield of 4 and 5 was higher compared to that of compounds 1–3.
Scheme 3

Syntheses of coumarins 4 and 5.

Syntheses of coumarins 4 and 5. Reagents and conditions: (a) 19 NIS, CF3COOH, CH3CN, reflux; 20 NIS, CF3SO3H, MeOH; (b) CsOH, syn-2-pyridinealdoxime, Cu2O, Bu4NBr, N2, H2O; (c) (C6H5)3P=CHCOOCH2CH3, Et2NPh, N2, reflux. Finally, daphnetin (6) was synthesized using the one-pot Wittig/cyclization reaction from commercially available 2,3,4-trihydroxybenzaldhyde in 65% yield (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4

Synthetic procedures of coumarin 6.

Synthetic procedures of coumarin 6. Reagents and conditions: (a) (C6H5)3P=CHCOOCH2CH3, Et2NPh, N2, reflux. This result for daphnetin (6) was identical compared to the previously reported synthesis [26]. Similarly for scopoletin (2), the overall yield of 50.4% (for four steps) is comparable to that of the previously reported synthesis (52.8%) [24]. However, for isofraxidin (1) and scoparone (5), the yields of 57.6% and 77.4% are significantly higher compared to those obtained previously [23,25]. The key step in this novel method is the hydrolysis of the iodinated compound, as substituents on the phenyl group have a great influence on this reaction. Activating groups can reduce the probability of hydrolysis and steric hindrance at the ortho position also influences the reaction.

3. Experimental

All solvents and commercially available reagents were purchased from the suppliers and used without further purification. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded using Bruker DPX 500 (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and 300 spectrometers, respectively. Spectra were recorded in CDCl3 and DMSO solutions and chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the standard. IR spectra were recorded on an Infinity Spectrum One spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Mass spectra (Applied Biosystems, Toronto, Canada) were recorded on an Agilent 1100 Series VS (ES, 4000 V) mass spectrometer. Melting points were measured using a Büchi B-450 apparatus (Shanghaishenguang, Shanghai, China). Flash chromatography was performed with ACROS silica gel (particle size 0.030–0.040 mm, pore diameter ca. 6 nm) using a glass column.

3.1. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Coumarins 1–6

The appropriate o-hydroxybenzaldehyde (1 mmol) and ethyl(triphenylphosphoranylidene) acetate (1.2 mmol) were dissolved in N,N-diethylaniline (1.5 mL) and the resulting mixture was stirred under a N2 atmosphere and reflux for 15 min. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure (1 mmHg, 52 °C) and the resulting brown oil was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether-ethyl acetate, 3:1). 7-Hydroxy-6,8-dimethoxy-2H-chromen-2-one (Isofraxidin, 1). Yellow solid. Yield: 80%. mp (°C): 147–148.5 (lit. 148–149) [13]. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.95 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.10 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.16 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.29 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, 3-CH), 6.66 (s, 1H, OH), 7.60 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, 4-CH); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 56.6 (OCH3), 61.2 (OCH3), 105.0 (C-5), 110.7 (C-4a), 112.5 (C-3), 135.2 (C-8), 143.5 (C-7), 144.5 (C-8a), 145.3 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 160.6 (C-2); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1699 (C=O), 1570 (C=C), 3327 (br, OH); HRMS (EI): m/z 223 [M+H+]. 7-Hydroxy-6-methoxy-2H-chromen-2-one (Scopoletin, 2). Yellow solid. Yield: 85%. mp (°C): 202.7–204.4 (lit. 204) [15]. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.23 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, 3-CH), 6.79 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.23 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.92 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, 4-CH), 10.33 (s, 1H, OH); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 56.4 (OCH3), 103.2 (C-8), 110.0 (C-5), 111.0 (C-3), 112.1 (C-4a), 144.9 (C-4), 145.7 (C-6), 150.0 (C-7), 151.6 (C-8a), 161.1 (C-2); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1558 (C=C), 1683 (C=O), 3334 (br, OH). HRMS (EI): m/z 193 [M+H+]. 7-Hydroxy-6-ethoxy-2H-chromen-2-one (3). Yellow solid. Yield: 80%. mp (°C): 138.5–142.0. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 1.37 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH3), 4.06 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, OCH2-), 6.23 (d, J 9.5 Hz, 1H, 3-CH), 6.81 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.90 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, 4-CH), 10.27 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 15.1 (CH3), 64.8 (-CH2O-), 103.2 (C-8), 111.0 (C-5), 111.2 (C-3), 112.1 (C-4a), 144.8 (C-4), 144.9 (C-6), 149.9 (C-7), 151.9 (C-8a), 161.1 (C-2); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1558 (C=C), 1699 (C=O), 1716, 3383 (br, OH);.HRMS (EI): m/z 207 [M+H+]. 6,7,8-Trimethoxy-2H-chromen-2-one (Dimethylfraxetin, 4). Yellow solid. Yield: 81%. mp (°C): 103.8–104.5 (lit. 104–105) [31]. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.91 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.00 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.04 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.35 (d, J = 9.5 Hz,1H, 3-CH), 6.69 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.63 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, 4-CH); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 56.3 (OCH3), 61.5 (OCH3), 61.8 (OCH3), 103.7 (C-5), 114.3 (C-4a), 115.2 (C-8), 141.2 (C-6), 143.1 (C-7), 143.5 (C-4), 145.9 (C-8), 150.1 (C-8a), 160.5 (C-2); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1566 (C=C), 1716 (C=O). HRMS (EI): m/z 237 [M+H+]. 6,7-Dimethoxy-2H-chromen-2-one (Scoparone, 5). Yellow solid. Yield: 91%. mp (°C): 142.6–148.4 (lit. 145–146) [18]. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.81 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.87 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.30 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, 3-CH), 7.07 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.25 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.955 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, 4-CH); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 56.3 (OCH3), 56.6 (OCH3), 100.5 (C-8) 109.3 (C-5), 111.6 (C-4a), 113.1 (C-3), 144.8 (C-6), 146.3 (C-4), 149.9 (C-8a), 153.0 (C-7), 161.0 (C-2); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1516 (C=C), 1558, 1708 (C=O), 1616, 3566 (br, OH). HRMS (EI): m/z 207 [M+H+]. 7,8-Dihydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (Daphnetin, 6). Yellow solid. Yield: 65%. mp (°C): 265.7–267.2 (lit. 265−268) [21]. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 6.20 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H, 3-CH), 6.81 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.03 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.91 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, 4-CH), 9.79 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, OH), 9.80 (d, J =7.0Hz, 1H, OH); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 111.7 (C-3), 112.5 (C-4a), 112.9 (C-6), 119.3 (C-5), 132.6 (C-8), 144.2 (C-8a), 145.6 (C-4), 150.1 (C-7), 160.9 (C-2); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1674 (C=O), 1508 (C=C), 1589. HRMS (EI): m/z 179 [M+H+].

3.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 10–12

The corresponding phenol (3 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (5 mL) and 4-dimethylamiopyridine (0.1 mmol) was added. The reaction was stirred for 0.5 h before addition of pivaloyl chloride (6 mmol) followed by dropwise addition of triethylamine (6 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction solution was poured into dichloromethane (100 mL) and washed with saturated sodium chloride solution (2 × 100 mL) and saturated sodium bicarbonate solution (2 × 100 mL). The organic phase was collected, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and filtered, and then the solvent was removed in vacuo to obtain compounds 10–12. 4-Formyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenyl-2,2-dimethylpropanoate (10, C14H18O5). Yellow solid. Yield 100%. mp (°C): 108–110.9. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): 1.39 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3), 3.88 (s, 6H, OCH3), 7.14 (s, 2H, Ar), 9.91 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 27.2 (CH3), 29.7 (CH3), 39.2 (CC=O), 56.37 (2 × OCH3), 106.2 (C-3,5) 134.1 (C-1), 134.4 (C-4), 153.0 (C-2,6), 175.8 (C=O), 191.2 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1751 (C=O), 1691, 1608; MS (EI): m/z 267 [M+H+]. 4-Formyl-2-methoxyphenyl-2,2-dimethylpropanoate (11, C13H16O4). White solid. Yield: 100%. mp (°C): 83.8–95.0. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 1.38 (s, 9H, C(CH3)), 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.19 (d, J = 7.5Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.46 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.48 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar), 9.95 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 27.2 (3 × CH3), 39.2(CC=O), 56.1 (OCH3), 110.8 (C-2), 123.4 (C-6), 124.8 (C-5), 135.1 (C-1), 145.6 (C-4), 152.1 (C-3), 176.1 (-COO-), 191.2 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1689 (C=O), 1749. MS (EI): m/z 237 [M+H+]. 2-Ethoxy-4-formylphenyl-2,2-dimethylpropanoate (12, C14H18O4). White solid. Yield: 100%. mp (°C): 83.8–85.3. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 1.38 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3), 1.41 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH3), 4.10 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, OCH2-), 7.19 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.46 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.46 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 9.93 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 14.6 (CH3), 27.2 (CH3), 39.2 (CC=O), 64.5 (-OCH2-), 111.4 (C-2), 123.3 (C-6), 124.6 (C-5), 135.0 (C-1), 145.6 (C-4), 151.4 (C-3), 176.0 (C=O), 191.2 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1699 (C=O), 1602; MS (EI): m/z 251 [M+H+].

3.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 13, 21, 22.

The appropriate benzaldehyde (3 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (5 mL) and N-iodosuccinimide (6 mmol) was added. Trifluoroacetic acid (0.3 μmol) was then added dropwise and the reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 6 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction solution was quenched by the addition of sodium sulfite (3 mmol) and stirred for five minutes. Subsequently, CH2Cl2 (100 mL) was added and the solution was extracted with saturated sodium chloride solution (3 × 100 mL). The organic phase was collected, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and filtered, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. Column chromatography (petroleum ether-ethyl acetate, 40:1) afforded the corresponding iodinated compound. 4-Formyl-3-iodo-2,6-dimethoxyphenyl-2,2-dimethylpropanoate (13, C14H17O5). Yellow solid. Yield: 80%. mp (°C): 100.7–102.5. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 1.40 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.37 (s, 1H, Ar), 10.08 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 27.1 (CH3), 39.3 (CC=O), 56.5 (OCH3), 61.5 (OCH3), 90.3 (C-2), 108.6 (C-6), 133.0 (C-4), 139.0 (C-1), 153.0 (C-5), 152.3 (C-3), 175.3 (C=O), 191.0 (C=O), 195.2 (C=O); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1691 (C=O), 1759; MS (EI): m/z 393 [M+H+]. 2-Iodo-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde (21, C10H11O3). Yellow solid. Yield: 99%. mp (°C): 67.6–68.1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.97 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.92 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.91 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.35 (s, 1H, OCH3), 10.05 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 61.2 (OCH3), 61.0 (OCH3), 56.3 (OCH3), 91.6 (C-2), 108.6 (C-6), 130.6 (C-1), 147.8 (C-4), 153.0 (C-5), 154.1 (C-3), 195.3 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1687 (C=O); MS (EI): m/z 323 [M+H+]. 2-Iodo-4,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (22, C9H9O2). Yellow solid. Yield: 99%. mp (°C):: 145.1–145.5. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.92 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.96 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.31 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.42 (s, 1H, Ar), 9.87 (s, 1H, Ar); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 56.1 (OCH3), 56.5 (OCH3), 92.8 (C-4), 111.1 (C-5), 121.8 (C-1), 128.4 (C-6), 149.8 (C-3), 154.5 (C-2), 194.9 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1672 (C=O); MS (EI): m/z 293 [M+H+].

3.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 14 and 15

The appropriate benzaldehyde (3 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (20 mL) and N-iodosuccinimide (6 mmol) was added. Trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (6 mmol) was then added dropwise and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The reaction was quenched by the addition of sodium sulfite and the reaction mixture was stirred for five minutes. Subsequently, dichloromethane (100 mL) was added and the solution was extracted with saturated sodium chloride solution (3 × 100 mL). The organic phase was collected, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and filtered; then, the solvent was removed in vacuo. Column chromatography (petroleum ether-ethyl acetate, 40:1) afforded the corresponding iodinated compound. 4-Formyl-5-iodo-2-methoxyphenyl-2,2-dimethylpropanoate (14, C13H15O4). Yellow solid. Yield: 77%. mp (°C): 98.4. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 1.36 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.50 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.58 (s, 1H, Ar), 9.96 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 27.1 (3 × CH3), 39.2 (CC=O), 56.2 (OCH3), 89.6 (C-2), 112.7 (C-6), 133.2 (C-3), 134.1 (C-1), 145.7 (C-4), 152.3 (C-5), 175.7 (-COO-), 194.9 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1693 (C=O), 1751; MS (EI): m/z 363 [M+H+]. 2-Ethoxy-4-formyl-5-iodophenyl-2,2-dimethylpropanoate (15, C14H17O4). Yellow solid. Yield: 80%. mp (°C): 81.7–83.8. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 1.37 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3), 1.39 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, -CH3), 4.08 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, OCH2-), 7.47 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.58 (s, 1H, Ar), 9.95 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 14.5 (CH3), 27.1 (CH3), 39.2 (CC=O), 64.7 (-OCH2-), 89.4 (C-2), 113.3 (C-6), 133.1 (C-3), 134.0 (C-1), 145.8 (C-4), 151.6 (C-5), 175.7 (C=O), 195.0 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1685 (C=O), 1759; MS (EI): m/z 377 [M+H+].

3.5. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 16–18, 23 and 24

To the appropriate iodinated compound (2 mmol) was added Cu2O (0.1 mmol), pyridine-2-aldoxime (0.2 mmol), tetrabutylammonium bromide (0.4 mmol), cesium hydroxide monohydrate (10 mmol), and water (2 mL) and the mixture was stirred under N2 atmosphere for 10 h. The reaction mixture was acidified to pH 5–7 with 1 M hydrochloric acid. The aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 100 mL). The organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and filtered; the solvent was then removed in vacuo. Column chromatography (petroleum ether-ethyl acetate: 20:1) afforded the corresponding phenol. 2,4-Dihydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (16, C9H10O5). Yellow solid. Yield: 90%. mp (°C): 87.5–89.8. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.91 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.01 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.41 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.75 (s, 1H, OH), 9.70 (s, 1H, OH), 11.30 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 56.6 (OCH3), 60.9 (OCH3), 108.9 (C-6), 112.9 (C-1), 134.6 (C-3), 141.2 (C-4), 146.9 (C-2), 151.6 (C-5), 194.6 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 3350 (br, OH), 1650 (C=O); MS (EI): m/z 199 [M+H+]. 2,4-Dihydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde (17, C8H8O4). Yellow solid. Yield: 77%. mp (°C): 152.1−153.2. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.92 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.41 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.53 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.89 (s, 1H, OH), 9.68 (s, 1H, OH), 11.34 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 56.5 (OCH3), 103.2 (C-3), 112.9 (C-1), 113.3 (C-6), 140.7 (C-5), 154.4 (C-4), 159.6 (C-2), 193.8 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 3292 (br, OH), 1635 (C=O); MS (EI): m/z 169 [M+H+]. 5-Ethoxy-2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (18, C9H10O4). Yellow solid. Yield: 77%. mp (°C): 131.8−134.4. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 1.47 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH3), 4.12 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, OCH2-), 6.49 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.53 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.88 (s, 1H, OH), 9.65 (s, 1H, OH), 11.33 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 14.8 (CH3), 65.3 (-CH2O), 103.1 (C-3), 113.3 (C-1), 113.9 (C-6), 139.9 (C-5), 154.6 (C-4), 159.5 (C-2), 193.8 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1627 (C=O), 1699, 3367 (br, OH); MS (EI): m/z 183 [M+H+]. 2-Hydroxy-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde (23, C10H12O4). Yellow solid. Yield: 83%. mp (°C): 46.0–46.6. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.87 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.94 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.05 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.78 (s, 1H), 9.78 (s, 1H, OH), 11.01 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 61.4 (OCH3), 61.1 (OCH3), 56.5 (OCH3), 109.2 (C-6), 115.2 (C-1), 141.0 (C-3), 146.3 (C-4), 150.3 (C-2), 151.8 (C-5), 194.9 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1641 (C=O), 3240 (br, OH); MS (EI): m/z 213 [M+H+]. 2-Hydroxy-4,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (24, C9H10O3). Yellow solid. Yield: 85%. mp (°C): 105.5–112.8. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.94 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.48 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.91 (s, 1H, Ar), 9.71 (s, 1H, OH), 11.40 (s, 1H, CHO); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 56.4 (OCH3), 56.4 (OCH3), 100.1 (C-3), 112.9 (C-1), 113.2 (C-6), 143.0 (C-5), 157.2 (C-2), 159.4 (C-4), 194.0 (CHO); IR (KBr, cm−1) 1624 (C=O), 3446 (br, OH); MS (EI): m/z 183 [M+H+].

4. Conclusions

A novel method for the total synthesis of six coumarins and five important intermediates has been developed. In most cases, the overall yields of these products are higher than those previously reported. Furthermore, this is the first reported total synthesis of 7-hydroxy-6-ethoxycoumarin (3) and 6,7,8-trimethoxycoumarin (4). All of these coumarins and advanced intermediates will be evaluated for their activity, and the results will be reported in due course.
  12 in total

1.  Synthesis and antihepatotoxic activity of some heterocyclic compounds containing the 1,4-dioxane ring system.

Authors:  B Ahmed; S A Khan; T Alam
Journal:  Pharmazie       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.267

2.  A simple and practical copper-catalyzed approach to substituted phenols from aryl halides by using water as the solvent.

Authors:  Daoshan Yang; Hua Fu
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 3.  [Synthetic studies on aromatic heterocyclic compounds].

Authors:  Takashi Harayama
Journal:  Yakugaku Zasshi       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.302

4.  Differential effects of esculetin and daphnetin on in vitro cell proliferation and in vivo estrogenicity.

Authors:  Fausto Alejandro Jiménez-Orozco; Ana Alejandra Román Rosales; Armando Vega-López; Maria Lilia Domínguez-López; Ma Juana García-Mondragón; Amelia Maldonado-Espinoza; Cristina Lemini; Nicandro Mendoza-Patiño; Juan José Mandoki
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Dihydrochalcone glucosides and antioxidant activity from the roots of Anneslea fragrans var. lanceolata.

Authors:  Hung-Yi Huang; Horng-Huey Ko; Yu-Jin Jin; Sheng-Zehn Yang; You-An Shih; Ih-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.072

6.  Short communication: synthesis and applications of Coumarin.

Authors:  Kinza Kinza Aslam; M Kaleem Khosa; Nazish Jahan; Sofia Nosheen
Journal:  Pak J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.684

7.  Antioxidant constituents from Cotoneaster racemiflora.

Authors:  Shafiullah Khan; Naheed Riaz; Nighat Afza; Abdul Malik; Lubna Iqbal; Mehreen Lateef
Journal:  J Asian Nat Prod Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.569

8.  Antioxidant properties of scopoletin isolated from Sinomonium acutum.

Authors:  Chin-Ying Shaw; Chen-Hui Chen; Chih-Chieh Hsu; Chien-Chih Chen; Ying-Chieh Tsai
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.878

9.  A study of the antimicrobial activity of selected naturally occurring and synthetic coumarins.

Authors:  T Smyth; V N Ramachandran; W F Smyth
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 5.283

10.  Antioxidant activities of coumarins from Korean medicinal plants and their structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  Phuong Thien Thuong; Tran Manh Hung; Tran Minh Ngoc; Do Thi Ha; Byung Sun Min; Seung Jun Kwack; Tae Suk Kang; Jae Sue Choi; KiHwan Bae
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.878

View more
  6 in total

1.  Bioactive Compounds from Medicinal Plants in Myanmar.

Authors:  Nwet Nwet Win; Hiroyuki Morita
Journal:  Prog Chem Org Nat Prod       Date:  2021

2.  Chemotaxonomy and Antibacterial Activity of the Extracts and Chemical Constituents of Psychotria succulenta Hiern. (Rubiaceae).

Authors:  Darille Claudia Ngnokam Jouogo; Jean-De-Dieu Tamokou; Rémy Bertrand Teponno; Germaine Matsuete-Takongmo; Laurence Voutquenne-Nazabadioko; Léon Azefack Tapondjou; David Ngnokam
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Gastroprotective efficacy and safety evaluation of scoparone derivatives on experimentally induced gastric lesions in rodents.

Authors:  Dong Ju Son; Gyung Rak Lee; Sungil Oh; Sung Eun Lee; Won Sik Choi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 4.  Isofraxidin: Synthesis, Biosynthesis, Isolation, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacological Properties.

Authors:  Mohammad Bagher Majnooni; Sajad Fakhri; Yalda Shokoohinia; Mahdi Mojarrab; Sara Kazemi-Afrakoti; Mohammad Hosein Farzaei
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  The Search for Putative Hits in Combating Leishmaniasis: The Contributions of Natural Products Over the Last Decade.

Authors:  Patrick O Sakyi; Richard K Amewu; Robert N O A Devine; Emahi Ismaila; Whelton A Miller; Samuel K Kwofie
Journal:  Nat Prod Bioprospect       Date:  2021-07-14

6.  A new and efficient method for the synthesis of novel 3-acetyl coumarins oxadiazoles derivatives with expected biological activity.

Authors:  Abdullah Sulaiman Al-Ayed; Naceur Hamdi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.