Literature DB >> 24351884

How many patients fulfil the surface electrocardiogram criteria for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation?

Daniel A Randles1, Nathaniel M Hawkins1, Matthew Shaw1, Ashish Y Patwala2, Stephen J Pettit1, David J Wright3.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the number of patients with a primary or secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indication who are eligible for subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) implantation according to the S-ICD manufacturer's surface electrocardiogram (ECG) screening template. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-six ICD patients with a non-paced ventricle were assessed using erect and supine ECG limb lead recordings to simulate the three S-ICD sensing vectors. Each ECG lead was scrutinized by two independent observers. Subcutaneous ICD eligibility required two or more leads to satisfy the S-ICD screening template in both erect and supine positions. Overall, 85.2% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI): 80.2-90.2%] fulfilled surface ECG screening criteria. The proportion of patients with 3, 2, 1, and 0 qualifying leads were 37.2% (95% CI: 30.4-44.0%), 48.0% (95% CI: 41.0-55.0%), 11.2% (95% CI: 6.8-15.6%), and 3.6% (95% CI: 1.0-6.2%). The S-ICD screening template was satisfied more often by Lead III (primary vector, 83.7%, 95% CI: 78.5-88.9%) and Lead II (secondary vector, 82.7%, 95% CI: 77.4-88.0%) compared with Lead I (alternate vector, 52.6%, 95% CI: 45.6-59.6%). A prolonged QRS duration was the only baseline characteristic independently associated with ineligibility for S-ICD implantation. There was 92.9% agreement between the two independent observers in assessment of eligibility using the S-ICD screening template.
CONCLUSION: About 85.2% of patients with an indication for a primary or secondary prevention ICD have a surface ECG that is suitable for S-ICD implantation when assessed with an S-ICD screening template. There is minor inter-observer variation in assessment of eligibility using the S-ICD screening template. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2013. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrocardiogram; Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24351884     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  18 in total

Review 1.  Subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators: indications and limitations.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Stefano Viani; Giulio Zucchelli; Andrea Di Cori; Luca Segreti; Luca Paperini; Dianora Levorato; Adriano Boem; Giulia Branchitta; Diana Andreini; Ezio Soldati
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-02

2.  Conventional and right-sided screening for subcutaneous ICD in a population with congenital heart disease at high risk of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Pau Alonso; Joaquín Osca; Joaquín Rueda; Oscar Cano; Pedro Pimenta; Ana Andres; María José Sancho; Luis Martinez
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Prevalence of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator based on template ECG screening and ineligible surface ECG predicting factors in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in China.

Authors:  Lanyan Guo; Minxia Zhang; Miaoyang Hu; Bo Wang; Jing Wang; Lei Zuo; Weiping Yang; Bing Liu; Liwen Liu
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  [Leadless pacemakers and subcutaneously implantable cardioverter defibrillators].

Authors:  C Stellbrink; B Hansky; D Meyer Zu Vilsendorf
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Inappropriate shock for myopotential over-sensing in a patient with subcutaneous ICD.

Authors:  Alessandro Corzani; Matteo Ziacchi; Mauro Biffi; Igor Diemberger; Cristian Martignani; Giuseppe Boriani
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-02-12

6.  Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator eligibility according to a novel automated screening tool and agreement with the standard manual electrocardiographic morphology tool.

Authors:  Pietro Francia; Matteo Ziacchi; Paolo De Filippo; Stefano Viani; Antonio D'Onofrio; Vincenzo Russo; Carmen Adduci; Mauro Biffi; Paola Ferrari; Valter Bianchi; Ernesto Ammendola; Francesca Palano; Jessica Frisoni; Sergio Valsecchi; Mariolina Lovecchio; Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Analysis of Screening Electrocardiogram for the Subcutaneous Defibrillator in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Vincent C Thomas; Mark Peterson; Martin McDaniel; Humberto Restrepo; Abraham Rothman; Amit Jain
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Dialytic interval and the timing of electrocardiographic screening for subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator placement in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Cindy You; Shishir Sharma; Aakash Bavishi; Christopher A Groh; Yazan Alia; Basil Saour; Rod Passman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Right versus left parasternal electrode position in the entirely subcutaneous ICD.

Authors:  Markus Bettin; Dirk Dechering; Gerrit Frommeyer; Robert Larbig; Andreas Löher; Florian Reinke; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 10.  Recent advances in the entirely subcutaneous ICD System.

Authors:  Markus Bettin; Florian Reinke; Benjamin Rath; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2015-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.