| Literature DB >> 24348501 |
Takehiko Doi1, Hiroyuki Shimada2, Hyuma Makizako1, Sangyoon Lee3, Hyuntae Park3, Kota Tsutsumimoto2, Kazuki Uemura4, Daisuke Yoshida2, Yuya Anan2, Takao Suzuki5.
Abstract
AIMS: This study aimed to identify differences in the implementation of cognitive activities and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) between healthy individuals and subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Cognitive impairment; Cognitive reserve; Dementia
Year: 2013 PMID: 24348501 PMCID: PMC3843918 DOI: 10.1159/000355553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra ISSN: 1664-5464
Characteristics of subjects by cognition group
| Variables | Cognitively healthy (n = 2,498) | MCI (n = 809) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 71.2±5.1 | 71.8±5.4 | 0.008 |
| Women, % | 52.6 | 52.8 | 0.935 |
| Educational level, years | 11.9±2.5 | 10.8±2.4 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 23.3±3.1 | 23.4±3.1 | 0.670 |
| Medical illness, % | |||
| Hypertension | 43.8 | 48.6 | 0.018 |
| Heart disease | 15.3 | 19.3 | 0.008 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 13.3 | 14.7 | 0.289 |
| Respiratory disease | 11.2 | 10.5 | 0.651 |
| Medications, n | 1.8±1.9 | 2.2±2.1 | <0.001 |
| Walking speed, m/s | 1.31±0.20 | 1.26±0.22 | <0.001 |
| GDS, score | 2.5±2.4 | 3.3±2.6 | <0.001 |
| Cognitive functions | |||
| MMSE, score | 27.4±1.8 | 26.6±1.8 | <0.001 |
| TMT-A | 19.0±4.1 | 23.6±7.8 | <0.001 |
| TMT-B | 35.8±10.6 | 51.5±19.8 | <0.001 |
| SDST | 41.3±7.0 | 35.2±7.8 | <0.001 |
| Figure selection | 11.6±1.7 | 11.2±1.7 | <0.001 |
| Story memory | 7.6±1.5 | 6.4±1.8 | <0.001 |
| Word recognition | 7.7±1.2 | 7.0±1.3 | <0.001 |
| Word recall | 4.4±1.7 | 3.1±2.0 | <0.001 |
| Smoking, % | 9.0 | 9.8 | 0.530 |
| Alcohol consumption, % | 46.8 | 46.4 | 0.839 |
| Physical activity, min/day | 289.5±162.0 | 274.7±154.7 | 0.022 |
Values are means ± SD or percentage. p values for scales and tests were calculated by the t test or χ2 test. MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; TMT = trail making test; SDST = symbol digit substitution task.
The assessment was conducted using the tablet version of the NCGG-FAT.
Logistic analysis of MCI according to participation in individual cognitive activities
| Cognitive activities | Cognitively healthy, n (%) | MCI, n (%) | Model 1 (crude) | Model 2 (adjusted) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | |||
| Reading | 2,434 (97.4) | 759 (93.8) | 0.41 | 0.28 – 0.59 | <0.001 | 0.53 | 0.35 – 0.78 | 0.002 |
| Computer | 1,044 (41.8) | 213 (26.3) | 0.50 | 0.42 – 0.59 | <0.001 | 0.65 | 0.53 – 0.80 | <0.001 |
| Map | 1,696 (67.9) | 450 (55.6) | 0.59 | 0.51 – 0.70 | <0.001 | 0.74 | 0.62 – 0.89 | 0.002 |
| Video or DVD | 1,462 (58.5) | 379 (46.9) | 0.63 | 0.53 – 0.73 | <0.001 | 0.72 | 0.61 – 0.86 | <0.001 |
Participation in cognitive activities was dummy coded, with no participation as the reference category. Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education, medications, alcohol, smoking, walking speed, physical activity, and GDS.
Fig. 1OR of the number of cognitive activities and MCI. No participation was the reference category for any cognitive activity.
Logistic analysis of MCI according to the implementation of individual IADLs
| IADLs | Cognitively healthy, n (%) | MCI, n (%) | Model 1 (crude) | Mode 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | |||
| Bus or train | 2,314 (92.6) | 721 (89.1) | 0.65 | 0.50 – 0.85 | 0.002 | 0.90 | 0.67 – 1.19 | 0.448 |
| Grocery shopping | 2,426 (97.1) | 783 (90.4) | 0.89 | 0.57 – 1.41 | 0.629 | 1.07 | 0.66 – 1.75 | 0.775 |
| Finance | 2,288 (91.6) | 731 (90.4) | 0.86 | 0.66 – 1.13 | 0.279 | 1.04 | 0.77 – 1.40 | 0.796 |
| Housekeeping | 2,185 (87.5) | 707 (87.4) | 0.99 | 0.78 – 1.26 | 0.993 | 1.08 | 0.82 – 1.41 | 0.586 |
| Telephone | 2,362 (94.6) | 760 (93.9) | 0.89 | 0.64 – 1.25 | 0.510 | 1.06 | 0.74 – 1.52 | 0.737 |
The implementation of IADL was dummy coded, with no participation as the reference category. Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education, medications, alcohol, smoking, walking speed, physical activity, and GDS.