Literature DB >> 24347259

The timing of adverse events with Foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening; implications for outpatient use.

Anthony C Sciscione1, Casey L Bedder1, Matthew K Hoffman1, Kelly Ruhstaller1, Phillip A Shlossman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the rate and timing of adverse events that occur during preinduction cervical ripening using the Foley catheter before extrusion of the balloon and institution of oxytocin. STUDY
DESIGN: Using electronic medical records, we identified all women who presented for preinduction cervical ripening using a Foley catheter with a term (≥37 weeks) singleton vertex live fetus from January 1, 2006, to June 14, 2009. Women were excluded if they had had a previous cesarean delivery, gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, pregestational diabetes, rupture of membranes before induction, fetal anomaly, or antepartum stillbirth. Outcomes were cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal tracing, vaginal bleeding, placental abruption, or intrapartum stillbirth occurring between 2 hours after Foley catheter placement and 6 am.
RESULTS: Among 2,514 women, 1,905 met the inclusion criteria. No adverse outcomes were noted among term, singleton uncomplicated pregnancies receiving a Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening who met inclusion criteria (relative risk, 0.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.0-0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: In a low-risk population, the use of the Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening was associated with no adverse outcomes. It appears to be a safe mechanism for cervical ripening and has the potential for use in the outpatient setting in a selected subset of women. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24347259     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1359718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  4 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction with the cervical ripening balloon as a method for induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sheri Ee-Lin Lim; Toh Lick Tan; Grace Yang Huang Ng; Shephali Tagore; Ei Ei Phyo Kyaw; George Seow Heong Yeo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure.

Authors:  H Kruit; O Heikinheimo; V-M Ulander; A Aitokallio-Tallberg; I Nupponen; J Paavonen; L Rahkonen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiyao Liu; Yu Wang; Fan Zhang; Xiaoni Zhong; Rong Ou; Xin Luo; Hongbo Qi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Outpatient Induction of Labor - Are Balloon Catheters an Appropriate Method?

Authors:  Werner Rath; Patrick Stelzl; Sven Kehl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.754

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.