Literature DB >> 24347152

The United Kingdom's experience with and future plans for revalidation.

Julian Archer1, Sam Regan de Bere.   

Abstract

Assuring fitness to practice for doctors internationally is increasingly complex. In the United Kingdom, the General Medical Council (GMC) has recently launched revalidation, which has been designed to bring all doctors into a governed environment. Since December 2012, all doctors who wish to practice are required to submit and reflect on supporting documentation against a framework of best practice, Good Medical Practice. These documents are brought together in an annual appraisal. Evidence of practice includes clinical governance activities such as significant events, complaints and audits, continuing professional development and feedback from colleagues and patients. Revalidation has been designed to support professionalism and identify early doctors in difficulty to support their remediation and so assure patient safety. The appraiser decides annually if the doctor has met the standard which is shared with the most senior doctor in the area, the responsible officer (RO). The RO's role is to make a recommendation for revalidation every 5 years for each doctor to the GMC. Revalidation is unique in that it is national, compulsory, involves all doctors regardless of position or training, and is linked to the potentially performance moderating process of appraisal. However, it has a long and troubled history that is shaped by high-profile medical scandals and delays from the profession, the GMC, and the government. Revalidation has been complicated further by rhetoric around patient care and driving up standards but at the same time identifying poor performance. The GMC have responded by commissioning a national evaluation which is currently under development.
Copyright © 2013 The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education, and the Council on CME, Association for Hospital Medical Education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  maintenance of certification/licensure; physician assessment/remediation; problem/dyscompetent physicians; profession-physicians; professionalism/ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24347152     DOI: 10.1002/chp.21206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  4 in total

1.  Policing the profession? Regulatory reform, restratification and the emergence of Responsible Officers as a new locus of power in UK medicine.

Authors:  Marie Bryce; Kayleigh Luscombe; Alan Boyd; Abigail Tazzyman; John Tredinnick-Rowe; Kieran Walshe; Julian Archer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Doctors' attitudes to, beliefs about, and experiences of the regulation of professional competence: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Anél Wiese; Emer Galvin; Charlotte Merrett; Irina Korotchikova; Dubhfeasa Slattery; Lucia Prihodova; Hilary Hoey; Ann O'Shaughnessy; Jantze Cotter; Janet O'Farrell; Mary Horgan; Deirdre Bennett
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-22

Review 3.  What are the implications of implementation science for medical education?

Authors:  David W Price; Dianne P Wagner; N Kevin Krane; Steven C Rougas; Nancy R Lowitt; Regina S Offodile; L Jane Easdown; Mark A W Andrews; Charles M Kodner; Monica Lypson; Barbara E Barnes
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-04-23

4.  The Evolving Purposes of Medical Revalidation in the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Study of Professional and Regulatory Narratives.

Authors:  Abigail Tazzyman; Jane Ferguson; Kieran Walshe; Alan Boyd; John Tredinnick-Rowe; Charlotte Hillier; Samantha Regan De Bere; Julian Archer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.