Sonja Gandhi1, Jamie L Fleet2, David G Bailey3, Eric McArthur4, Ron Wald5, Faisal Rehman2, Amit X Garg6. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada. 2. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada. 3. Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada. 4. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada4Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada. 5. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 6. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada3Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada4Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Calcium-channel blockers are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4; EC 1.14.13.97) enzyme. Blood concentrations of these drugs may rise to harmful levels when CYP3A4 activity is inhibited. Clarithromycin is an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and azithromycin is not, which makes comparisons between these 2 macrolide antibiotics useful in assessing clinically important drug interactions. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk of acute adverse events following coprescription of clarithromycin compared with azithromycin in older adults taking a calcium-channel blocker. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada, from 2003 through 2012 of older adults (mean age, 76 years) who were newly coprescribed clarithromycin (n = 96,226) or azithromycin (n = 94,083) while taking a calcium-channel blocker (amlodipine, felodipine, nifedipine, diltiazem, or verapamil). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospitalization with acute kidney injury (primary outcome) and hospitalization with hypotension and all-cause mortality (secondary outcomes examined separately). Outcomes were assessed within 30 days of a new coprescription. RESULTS: There were no differences in measured baseline characteristics between the clarithromycin and azithromycin groups. Amlodipine was the most commonly prescribed calcium-channel blocker (more than 50% of patients). Coprescribing clarithromycin vs azithromycin with a calcium-channel blocker was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization with acute kidney injury (420 patients of 96,226 taking clarithromycin [0.44%] vs 208 patients of 94,083 taking azithromycin [0.22%]; absolute risk increase, 0.22% [95% CI, 0.16%-0.27%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.98 [95% CI, 1.68-2.34]). In a subgroup analysis, the risk was highest with dihydropyridines, particularly nifedipine (OR, 5.33 [95% CI, 3.39-8.38]; absolute risk increase, 0.63% [95% CI, 0.49%-0.78%]). Coprescription with clarithromycin was also associated with a higher risk of hospitalization with hypotension (111 patients of 96,226 taking clarithromycin [0.12%] vs 68 patients of 94,083 taking azithromycin [0.07%]; absolute risk increase, 0.04% [95% CI, 0.02%-0.07%]; OR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.18-2.16]) and all-cause mortality (984 patients of 96,226 taking clarithromycin [1.02%] vs 555 patients of 94,083 taking azithromycin [0.59%]; absolute risk increase, 0.43% [95% CI, 0.35%-0.51%]; OR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.57-1.93]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among older adults taking a calcium-channel blocker, concurrent use of clarithromycin compared with azithromycin was associated with a small but statistically significant greater 30-day risk of hospitalization with acute kidney injury. These findings support current safety warnings regarding concurrent use of CYP3A4 inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers.
IMPORTANCE: Calcium-channel blockers are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4; EC 1.14.13.97) enzyme. Blood concentrations of these drugs may rise to harmful levels when CYP3A4 activity is inhibited. Clarithromycin is an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and azithromycin is not, which makes comparisons between these 2 macrolide antibiotics useful in assessing clinically important drug interactions. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk of acute adverse events following coprescription of clarithromycin compared with azithromycin in older adults taking a calcium-channel blocker. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada, from 2003 through 2012 of older adults (mean age, 76 years) who were newly coprescribed clarithromycin (n = 96,226) or azithromycin (n = 94,083) while taking a calcium-channel blocker (amlodipine, felodipine, nifedipine, diltiazem, or verapamil). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospitalization with acute kidney injury (primary outcome) and hospitalization with hypotension and all-cause mortality (secondary outcomes examined separately). Outcomes were assessed within 30 days of a new coprescription. RESULTS: There were no differences in measured baseline characteristics between the clarithromycin and azithromycin groups. Amlodipine was the most commonly prescribed calcium-channel blocker (more than 50% of patients). Coprescribing clarithromycin vs azithromycin with a calcium-channel blocker was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization with acute kidney injury (420 patients of 96,226 taking clarithromycin [0.44%] vs 208 patients of 94,083 taking azithromycin [0.22%]; absolute risk increase, 0.22% [95% CI, 0.16%-0.27%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.98 [95% CI, 1.68-2.34]). In a subgroup analysis, the risk was highest with dihydropyridines, particularly nifedipine (OR, 5.33 [95% CI, 3.39-8.38]; absolute risk increase, 0.63% [95% CI, 0.49%-0.78%]). Coprescription with clarithromycin was also associated with a higher risk of hospitalization with hypotension (111 patients of 96,226 taking clarithromycin [0.12%] vs 68 patients of 94,083 taking azithromycin [0.07%]; absolute risk increase, 0.04% [95% CI, 0.02%-0.07%]; OR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.18-2.16]) and all-cause mortality (984 patients of 96,226 taking clarithromycin [1.02%] vs 555 patients of 94,083 taking azithromycin [0.59%]; absolute risk increase, 0.43% [95% CI, 0.35%-0.51%]; OR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.57-1.93]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among older adults taking a calcium-channel blocker, concurrent use of clarithromycin compared with azithromycin was associated with a small but statistically significant greater 30-day risk of hospitalization with acute kidney injury. These findings support current safety warnings regarding concurrent use of CYP3A4 inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers.
Authors: Kevin Yau; Jorge G Burneo; Racquel Jandoc; Eric McArthur; Flory Tsobo Muanda; Chirag R Parikh; Ron Wald; Matthew A Weir; Amit X Garg Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Mai H Trac; Eric McArthur; Racquel Jandoc; Stephanie N Dixon; Danielle M Nash; Daniel G Hackam; Amit X Garg Journal: CMAJ Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Carina Iskander; Eric McArthur; Danielle M Nash; Sonja Gandhi-Banga; Matthew A Weir; Flory Tsobo Muanda; Amit X Garg Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2019-10-22
Authors: Lavanya Bathini; Racquel Jandoc; Paul Kuwornu; Eric McArthur; Matthew A Weir; Manish M Sood; Marisa Battistella; Flory T Muanda; Aiden Liu; Arsh K Jain; Amit X Garg Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Justin X G Zhu; Danielle M Nash; Eric McArthur; Alexandra Farag; Amit X Garg; Arsh K Jain Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Namisha Singh; Sonja Gandhi; Eric McArthur; Louise Moist; Arsh K Jain; Aiden R Liu; Manish M Sood; Amit X Garg Journal: CMAJ Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 8.262