Mai H Trac1, Eric McArthur1, Racquel Jandoc1, Stephanie N Dixon1, Danielle M Nash1, Daniel G Hackam1, Amit X Garg2. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Trac, Garg), Western University; Lawson Health Research Institute (Trac), London Health Sciences Centre; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Western (McArthur, Jandoc, Dixon, Nash, Garg); Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology (Hackam) and Nephrology (Garg), Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Trac, Garg), Western University; Lawson Health Research Institute (Trac), London Health Sciences Centre; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Western (McArthur, Jandoc, Dixon, Nash, Garg); Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology (Hackam) and Nephrology (Garg), Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. amit.garg@lhsc.on.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many respiratory tract infections are treated with macrolide antibiotics. Regulatory agencies warn that these antibiotics increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. We examined the 30-day risk of ventricular arrhythmia and all-cause mortality associated with macrolide antibiotics relative to nonmacrolide antibiotics. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study involving older adults (age > 65 yr) with a new prescription for an oral macrolide antibiotic (azithromycin, clarithromycin or erythromycin) in Ontario from 2002 to 2013. Our primary outcome was a hospital encounter with ventricular arrhythmia within 30 days after a new prescription. Our secondary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. We matched patients 1:1 using propensity scores to patients prescribed nonmacrolide antibiotics (amoxicillin, cefuroxime or levofloxacin). We used conditional logistic regression to measure the association between macrolide exposure and outcomes, and repeated the analysis in 4 subgroups defined by the presence or absence of chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease and concurrent use of a drug known to prolong the QT interval. RESULTS: Compared with nonmacrolide antibiotics, macrolide antibiotics were not associated with a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmia (0.03% v. 0.03%; relative risk [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.36) and were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (0.62% v. 0.76%; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86). These associations were similar in all subgroups. INTERPRETATION: Among older adults, macrolide antibiotics were not associated with a higher 30-day risk of ventricular arrhythmia than nonmacrolide antibiotics. These findings suggest that current warnings from the US Food and Drug Administration may be overstated.
BACKGROUND: Many respiratory tract infections are treated with macrolide antibiotics. Regulatory agencies warn that these antibiotics increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. We examined the 30-day risk of ventricular arrhythmia and all-cause mortality associated with macrolide antibiotics relative to nonmacrolide antibiotics. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study involving older adults (age > 65 yr) with a new prescription for an oral macrolide antibiotic (azithromycin, clarithromycin or erythromycin) in Ontario from 2002 to 2013. Our primary outcome was a hospital encounter with ventricular arrhythmia within 30 days after a new prescription. Our secondary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. We matched patients 1:1 using propensity scores to patients prescribed nonmacrolide antibiotics (amoxicillin, cefuroxime or levofloxacin). We used conditional logistic regression to measure the association between macrolide exposure and outcomes, and repeated the analysis in 4 subgroups defined by the presence or absence of chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease and concurrent use of a drug known to prolong the QT interval. RESULTS: Compared with nonmacrolide antibiotics, macrolide antibiotics were not associated with a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmia (0.03% v. 0.03%; relative risk [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.36) and were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (0.62% v. 0.76%; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86). These associations were similar in all subgroups. INTERPRETATION: Among older adults, macrolide antibiotics were not associated with a higher 30-day risk of ventricular arrhythmia than nonmacrolide antibiotics. These findings suggest that current warnings from the US Food and Drug Administration may be overstated.
Authors: Matthew A Weir; Michael M Beyea; Tara Gomes; David N Juurlink; Muhammad Mamdani; Peter G Blake; Ron Wald; Amit X Garg Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-04-11
Authors: Andrew W Y Shih; Matthew A Weir; Kristin K Clemens; Zhan Yao; Tara Gomes; Muhammad M Mamdani; David N Juurlink; Amanda Hird; Anthony Hodsman; Chirag R Parikh; Ron Wald; Suzanne M Cadarette; Amit X Garg Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Amit M Patel; Salimah Shariff; David G Bailey; David N Juurlink; Sonja Gandhi; Muhammad Mamdani; Tara Gomes; Jamie Fleet; Y Joseph Hwang; Amit X Garg Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sean Hennessy; Charles E Leonard; Cristin P Freeman; Rajat Deo; Craig Newcomb; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom; Warren B Bilker Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Jamie L Fleet; Stephanie N Dixon; Salimah Z Shariff; Robert R Quinn; Danielle M Nash; Ziv Harel; Amit X Garg Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Danielle Petricone-Westwood; Georden Jones; Brittany Mutsaers; Caroline Séguin Leclair; Christina Tomei; Geneviève Trudel; Andreas Dinkel; Sophie Lebel Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2019-02