PURPOSE: We tested variants in genes related to lutein and zeaxanthin status for association with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the Carotenoids in Age-Related Eye Disease Study (CAREDS). METHODS: Of 2005 CAREDS participants, 1663 were graded for AMD from fundus photography and genotyped for 424 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 24 candidate genes for carotenoid status. Of 337 AMD cases 91% had early or intermediate AMD. The SNPs were tested individually for association with AMD using logistic regression. A carotenoid-related genetic risk model was built using backward selection and compared to existing AMD risk factors using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 24 variants from five genes (BCMO1, BCO2, NPCL1L1, ABCG8, and FADS2) not previously related to AMD and four genes related to AMD in previous studies (SCARB1, ABCA1, APOE, and ALDH3A2) were associated independently with AMD, after adjusting for age and ancestry. Variants in all genes (not always the identical SNPs) were associated with lutein and zeaxanthin in serum and/or macula, in this or other samples, except for BCO2 and FADS2. A genetic risk score including nine variants significantly (P = 0.002) discriminated between AMD cases and controls beyond age, smoking, CFH Y402H, and ARMS2 A69S. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for AMD among women in the highest versus lowest quintile for the risk score was 3.1 (2.0-4.9). CONCLUSIONS: Variants in genes related to lutein and zeaxanthin status were associated with AMD in CAREDS, adding to the body of evidence supporting a protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in risk of AMD.
PURPOSE: We tested variants in genes related to lutein and zeaxanthin status for association with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the Carotenoids in Age-Related Eye Disease Study (CAREDS). METHODS: Of 2005 CAREDS participants, 1663 were graded for AMD from fundus photography and genotyped for 424 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 24 candidate genes for carotenoid status. Of 337 AMD cases 91% had early or intermediate AMD. The SNPs were tested individually for association with AMD using logistic regression. A carotenoid-related genetic risk model was built using backward selection and compared to existing AMD risk factors using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 24 variants from five genes (BCMO1, BCO2, NPCL1L1, ABCG8, and FADS2) not previously related to AMD and four genes related to AMD in previous studies (SCARB1, ABCA1, APOE, and ALDH3A2) were associated independently with AMD, after adjusting for age and ancestry. Variants in all genes (not always the identical SNPs) were associated with lutein and zeaxanthin in serum and/or macula, in this or other samples, except for BCO2 and FADS2. A genetic risk score including nine variants significantly (P = 0.002) discriminated between AMD cases and controls beyond age, smoking, CFHY402H, and ARMS2A69S. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for AMD among women in the highest versus lowest quintile for the risk score was 3.1 (2.0-4.9). CONCLUSIONS: Variants in genes related to lutein and zeaxanthin status were associated with AMD in CAREDS, adding to the body of evidence supporting a protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in risk of AMD.
Authors: T S Aleman; J L Duncan; M L Bieber; E de Castro; D A Marks; L M Gardner; J D Steinberg; A V Cideciyan; M G Maguire; S G Jacobson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Elena Rochtchina; Chelsea Myers; Cornelia M van Duijn; Kristine E Lee; Barbara E K Klein; Stacy M Meuer; Paulus T V M de Jong; Elizabeth G Holliday; Ava G Tan; André G Uitterlinden; Theru S Sivakumaran; John Attia; Albert Hofman; Paul Mitchell; Johannes R Vingerling; Sudha K Iyengar; A Cecile J W Janssens; Jie Jin Wang; Ronald Klein; Caroline C W Klaver Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: B R Hammond; E J Johnson; R M Russell; N I Krinsky; K J Yeum; R B Edwards; D M Snodderly Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Julie A Mares; Tara L LaRowe; D Max Snodderly; Suzen M Moeller; Michael J Gruber; Michael L Klein; Billy R Wooten; Elizabeth J Johnson; Richard J Chappell Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lei Wu; Xin Guo; Weiqun Wang; Denis M Medeiros; Stephen L Clarke; Edralin A Lucas; Brenda J Smith; Dingbo Lin Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2016-07-07
Authors: Nancy E Moran; Jennifer M Thomas-Ahner; Jessica L Fleming; Joseph P McElroy; Rebecca Mehl; Elizabeth M Grainger; Ken M Riedl; Amanda E Toland; Steven J Schwartz; Steven K Clinton Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Jessica L Cooperstone; Janet A Novotny; Ken M Riedl; Morgan J Cichon; David M Francis; Robert W Curley; Steven J Schwartz; Earl H Harrison Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Nathan G Lambert; Hanan ElShelmani; Malkit K Singh; Fiona C Mansergh; Michael A Wride; Maximilian Padilla; David Keegan; Ruth E Hogg; Balamurali K Ambati Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 21.198