Harsha L Rao1, Uday K Addepalli2, Ravi K Yadav2, Sirisha Senthil2, Nikhil S Choudhari2, Chandra S Garudadri2. 1. Vazir Sultan Tobacco (VST) Glaucoma Center, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India. Electronic address: harshalaxmanarao@gmail.com. 2. Vazir Sultan Tobacco (VST) Glaucoma Center, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of scan quality on the diagnostic accuracies of optic nerve head (ONH), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and ganglion cell complex (GCC) parameters of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) in glaucoma. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-two eyes of 183 control subjects (mean deviation [MD]: -1.84 dB) and 207 eyes of 159 glaucoma patients (MD: -7.31 dB) underwent ONH, RNFL, and GCC scanning with SD OCT. Scan quality of SD OCT images was based on signal strength index (SSI) values. Influence of SSI on diagnostic accuracy of SD OCT was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) regression. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracies of all SD OCT parameters were better when the SSI values were higher. This effect was statistically significant (P < .05) for ONH and RNFL but not for GCC parameters. In mild glaucoma (MD of -5 dB), area under ROC curve (AUC) for rim area, average RNFL thickness, and average GCC thickness parameters improved from 0.651, 0.678, and 0.726, respectively, at an SSI value of 30 to 0.873, 0.962, and 0.886, respectively, at an SSI of 70. AUCs of the same parameters in advanced glaucoma (MD of -15 dB) improved from 0.747, 0.890, and 0.873, respectively, at an SSI value of 30 to 0.922, 0.994, and 0.959, respectively, at an SSI of 70. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracies of SD OCT parameters in glaucoma were significantly influenced by the scan quality even when the SSI values were within the manufacturer-recommended limits. These results should be considered while interpreting the SD OCT scans for glaucoma.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of scan quality on the diagnostic accuracies of optic nerve head (ONH), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and ganglion cell complex (GCC) parameters of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) in glaucoma. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-two eyes of 183 control subjects (mean deviation [MD]: -1.84 dB) and 207 eyes of 159 glaucomapatients (MD: -7.31 dB) underwent ONH, RNFL, and GCC scanning with SD OCT. Scan quality of SD OCT images was based on signal strength index (SSI) values. Influence of SSI on diagnostic accuracy of SD OCT was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) regression. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracies of all SD OCT parameters were better when the SSI values were higher. This effect was statistically significant (P < .05) for ONH and RNFL but not for GCC parameters. In mild glaucoma (MD of -5 dB), area under ROC curve (AUC) for rim area, average RNFL thickness, and average GCC thickness parameters improved from 0.651, 0.678, and 0.726, respectively, at an SSI value of 30 to 0.873, 0.962, and 0.886, respectively, at an SSI of 70. AUCs of the same parameters in advanced glaucoma (MD of -15 dB) improved from 0.747, 0.890, and 0.873, respectively, at an SSI value of 30 to 0.922, 0.994, and 0.959, respectively, at an SSI of 70. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracies of SD OCT parameters in glaucoma were significantly influenced by the scan quality even when the SSI values were within the manufacturer-recommended limits. These results should be considered while interpreting the SD OCT scans for glaucoma.
Authors: Steven L Mansberger; Shivali A Menda; Brad A Fortune; Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Harsha L Rao; Uday K Addepalli; Ravi K Yadav; Nikhil S Choudhari; Sirisha Senthil; Chandra S Garudadri Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Md Hasnat Ali; Brian Wainwright; Alexander Petersen; Ganesh B Jonnadula; Meghana Desai; Harsha L Rao; M B Srinivas; S Rao Jammalamadaka; Sirisha Senthil; Saumyadipta Pyne Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Keke Liu; Ou Tan; Qi Sheng You; Aiyin Chen; Jonathan C H Chan; Bonnie N K Choy; Kendrick C Shih; Jasper K W Wong; Alex L K Ng; Janice J C Cheung; Michael Y Ni; Jimmy S M Lai; Gabriel M Leung; Liang Liu; David Huang; Ian Y H Wong Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 3.048
Authors: Simon S Gao; Yali Jia; Liang Liu; Miao Zhang; Hana L Takusagawa; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799