| Literature DB >> 24344784 |
Alexander Soutschek1, Tilo Strobach, Torsten Schubert.
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that both reward anticipation and expected or experienced conflicts activate cognitive control. The present study investigated how these factors interact during conflict processing. In two experiments, participants performed a variant of the Stroop task, receiving performance-dependent monetary rewards in some blocks. In addition, we manipulated the level of conflict-triggered reactive and expectancy-driven proactive control: In Experiment 1, we compared the Stroop effect after previously congruent and incongruent trials to examine the conflict adaptation effect (reactive control). We found that the level of motivation did not interact with conflict adaptation. In Experiment 2, we varied the proportion of congruent and incongruent trials to manipulate conflict expectancy (proactive control). The data suggest the effects of motivation to be less pronounced under conditions of high conflict expectancy. We conclude that the interaction of motivation with cognitive determinants of control depends on whether these activate proactive or reactive control processes.Entities:
Keywords: Conflict adaptation effect; Conflict expectancy effect; Conflict processing; Reward
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24344784 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.870134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Emot ISSN: 0269-9931