Literature DB >> 24344357

The genotype-dependent influence of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes on fetal development.

Xinglu Huang, Fan Zhang, Xiaolian Sun, Ki-Young Choi, Gang Niu, Guofeng Zhang, Jinxia Guo, Seulki Lee, Xiaoyuan Chen.   

Abstract

In many cases cancer is caused by gene deficiency that is being passed along from generation to generation. Soluble carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have shown promising applications in the diagnosis and therapy of cancer, however, the potential relationship between cancer-prone individuals and response to CNT exposure as a prerequisite for development of personalized nanomedicine, is still poorly understood. Here we report that intravenous injections of multi-walled carbon nanotubes into p53 (a well-known cancer-susceptible gene) heterozygous pregnant mice can induce p53- dependent responses in fetal development. Larger sized multi-walled carbon nanotubes moved across the blood-placenta barrier (BPB), restricted the development of fetuses, and induced brain deformity, whereas single-walled and smaller sized multi-walled carbon nanotubes showed no or less fetotoxicity. A molecular mechanism study found that multi-walled carbon nanotubes directly triggered p53-dependent apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Based on the molecular mechanism, we also incorporated N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an FDA approved antioxidant, to prevent CNTs induced nuclear DNA damage and reduce brain development abnormalities. Our findings suggest that CNTs might have genetic background-dependent toxic effect on the normal development of the embryo, and provide new insights into protection against nanoparticle-induced toxicity in potential clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24344357      PMCID: PMC4091802          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  63 in total

1.  N-acetylcysteine, a cancer chemopreventive agent, causes oxidative damage to cellular and isolated DNA.

Authors:  S Oikawa; K Yamada; N Yamashita; S Tada-Oikawa; S Kawanishi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Two-phase dynamics of p53 in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Zhang; Feng Liu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The p53 tumour suppressor gene.

Authors:  A J Levine; J Momand; C A Finlay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  p53 dependence of early apoptotic and proliferative responses within the mouse intestinal epithelium following gamma-irradiation.

Authors:  A R Clarke; S Gledhill; M L Hooper; C C Bird; A H Wyllie
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Oxygen sensitivity severely limits the replicative lifespan of murine fibroblasts.

Authors:  Simona Parrinello; Enrique Samper; Ana Krtolica; Joshua Goldstein; Simon Melov; Judith Campisi
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 6.  Cytoplasmic functions of the tumour suppressor p53.

Authors:  Douglas R Green; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Wild-type p53 is a cell cycle checkpoint determinant following irradiation.

Authors:  S J Kuerbitz; B S Plunkett; W V Walsh; M B Kastan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The cancer genome.

Authors:  Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Carbon nanotube thin film biosensors for sensitive and reproducible whole virus detection.

Authors:  Himadri S Mandal; Zhengding Su; Andrew Ward; Xiaowu Shirley Tang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Inhaled carbon nanotubes reach the subpleural tissue in mice.

Authors:  Jessica P Ryman-Rasmussen; Mark F Cesta; Arnold R Brody; Jeanette K Shipley-Phillips; Jeffrey I Everitt; Earl W Tewksbury; Owen R Moss; Brian A Wong; Darol E Dodd; Melvin E Andersen; James C Bonner
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  21 in total

1.  In vivo activation of a T helper 2-driven innate immune response in lung fibrosis induced by multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Jie Dong; Qiang Ma
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography imaging using radiolabeled inorganic nanomaterials.

Authors:  Xiaolian Sun; Weibo Cai; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  Distribution of single wall carbon nanotubes in the Xenopus laevis embryo after microinjection.

Authors:  Brian D Holt; Joseph H Shawky; Kris Noel Dahl; Lance A Davidson; Mohammad F Islam
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 4.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 5.  Toxicology data of graphene-family nanomaterials: an update.

Authors:  Feng Xiaoli; Chen Qiyue; Guo Weihong; Zhang Yaqing; Hu Chen; Wu Junrong; Shao Longquan
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Advances in mechanisms and signaling pathways of carbon nanotube toxicity.

Authors:  Jie Dong; Qiang Ma
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 7.  Positron emission tomography and nanotechnology: A dynamic duo for cancer theranostics.

Authors:  Shreya Goel; Christopher G England; Feng Chen; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Gestational nanomaterial exposures: microvascular implications during pregnancy, fetal development and adulthood.

Authors:  P A Stapleton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Maternal-engineered nanomaterial exposure disrupts progeny cardiac function and bioenergetics.

Authors:  Quincy A Hathaway; Cody E Nichols; Danielle L Shepherd; Phoebe A Stapleton; Sarah L McLaughlin; Janelle C Stricker; Stephanie L Rellick; Mark V Pinti; Alaeddin B Abukabda; Carroll R McBride; Jinghai Yi; Seth M Stine; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; John M Hollander
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 10.  Nanoparticles in pregnancy: the next frontier in reproductive therapeutics.

Authors:  Natasha Pritchard; Tu'uhevaha Kaitu'u-Lino; Lynda Harris; Stephen Tong; Natalie Hannan
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 17.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.