BACKGROUND: Protein supplements are consumed frequently by athletes and recreationally active adults for various reasons, including improved exercise performance and recovery after exercise. Yet, far too often, the decision to purchase and consume protein supplements is based on marketing claims rather than available evidence-based research. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to provide a systematic and comprehensive analysis of the literature that tested the hypothesis that protein supplements, when combined with carbohydrate, directly enhance endurance performance by sparing muscle glycogen during exercise and increasing the rate of glycogen restoration during recovery. The analysis was used to create evidence statements based on an accepted strength of recommendation taxonomy. DATA SOURCES: English language articles were searched with PubMed and Google Scholar using protein and supplements together with performance, exercise, competition, and muscle, alone or in combination as keywords. Additional articles were retrieved from reference lists found in these papers. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria specified recruiting healthy active adults less than 50 years of age and evaluating the effects of protein supplements in combination with carbohydrate on endurance performance metrics such as time-to-exhaustion, time-trial, or total power output during sprint intervals. The literature search identified 28 articles, of which 26 incorporated test metrics that permitted exclusive categorization into one of the following sections: ingestion during an acute bout of exercise (n = 11) and ingestion during and after exercise to affect subsequent endurance performance (n = 15). The remaining two articles contained performance metrics that spanned both categories. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: All papers were read in detail and searched for experimental design confounders such as energy content of the supplements, dietary control, use of trained or untrained participants, number of subjects recruited, direct measures of muscle glycogen utilization and restoration, and the sensitivity of the test metrics to explain the discrepant findings. RESULTS: Our evidence statements assert that when carbohydrate supplementation was delivered at optimal rates during or after exercise, protein supplements provided no further ergogenic effect, regardless of the performance metric used. In addition, the limited data available suggested recovery of muscle glycogen stores together with subsequent rate of utilization during exercise is not related to the potential ergogenic effect of protein supplements. LIMITATIONS: Many studies lacked ability to measure direct effects of protein supplementation on muscle metabolism through determination of muscle glycogen, kinetic assessments of protein turnover, or changes in key signaling proteins, and therefore could not substantiate changes in rates of synthesis or degradation of protein. As a result, the interpretation of their data was often biased and inconclusive since they lacked ability to test the proposed underlying mechanism of action. CONCLUSIONS: When carbohydrate is delivered at optimal rates during or after endurance exercise, protein supplements appear to have no direct endurance performance enhancing effect.
BACKGROUND: Protein supplements are consumed frequently by athletes and recreationally active adults for various reasons, including improved exercise performance and recovery after exercise. Yet, far too often, the decision to purchase and consume protein supplements is based on marketing claims rather than available evidence-based research. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to provide a systematic and comprehensive analysis of the literature that tested the hypothesis that protein supplements, when combined with carbohydrate, directly enhance endurance performance by sparing muscle glycogen during exercise and increasing the rate of glycogen restoration during recovery. The analysis was used to create evidence statements based on an accepted strength of recommendation taxonomy. DATA SOURCES: English language articles were searched with PubMed and Google Scholar using protein and supplements together with performance, exercise, competition, and muscle, alone or in combination as keywords. Additional articles were retrieved from reference lists found in these papers. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria specified recruiting healthy active adults less than 50 years of age and evaluating the effects of protein supplements in combination with carbohydrate on endurance performance metrics such as time-to-exhaustion, time-trial, or total power output during sprint intervals. The literature search identified 28 articles, of which 26 incorporated test metrics that permitted exclusive categorization into one of the following sections: ingestion during an acute bout of exercise (n = 11) and ingestion during and after exercise to affect subsequent endurance performance (n = 15). The remaining two articles contained performance metrics that spanned both categories. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: All papers were read in detail and searched for experimental design confounders such as energy content of the supplements, dietary control, use of trained or untrained participants, number of subjects recruited, direct measures of muscle glycogen utilization and restoration, and the sensitivity of the test metrics to explain the discrepant findings. RESULTS: Our evidence statements assert that when carbohydrate supplementation was delivered at optimal rates during or after exercise, protein supplements provided no further ergogenic effect, regardless of the performance metric used. In addition, the limited data available suggested recovery of muscle glycogen stores together with subsequent rate of utilization during exercise is not related to the potential ergogenic effect of protein supplements. LIMITATIONS: Many studies lacked ability to measure direct effects of protein supplementation on muscle metabolism through determination of muscle glycogen, kinetic assessments of protein turnover, or changes in key signaling proteins, and therefore could not substantiate changes in rates of synthesis or degradation of protein. As a result, the interpretation of their data was often biased and inconclusive since they lacked ability to test the proposed underlying mechanism of action. CONCLUSIONS: When carbohydrate is delivered at optimal rates during or after endurance exercise, protein supplements appear to have no direct endurance performance enhancing effect.
Authors: Paul B Laursen; Graeme T Francis; Chris R Abbiss; Michael J Newton; Kazunori Nosaka Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jason R Karp; Jeanne D Johnston; Sandra Tecklenburg; Timothy D Mickleborough; Alyce D Fly; Joel M Stager Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Kelly Anne Erdman; Tak S Fung; Patricia K Doyle-Baker; Marja J Verhoef; Raylene A Reimer Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: David S Rowlands; Rhys M Thorp; Karen Rossler; David F Graham; Mike J Rockell Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Juan F Garcia; Soledad Arribalzaga; Raquel Díez; Cristina Lopez; M Nelida Fernandez; Juan J Garcia; M Jose Diez; Jesús Seco-Calvo; Matilde Sierra; Ana M Sahagún Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Chad M Kerksick; Shawn Arent; Brad J Schoenfeld; Jeffrey R Stout; Bill Campbell; Colin D Wilborn; Lem Taylor; Doug Kalman; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Richard B Kreider; Darryn Willoughby; Paul J Arciero; Trisha A VanDusseldorp; Michael J Ormsbee; Robert Wildman; Mike Greenwood; Tim N Ziegenfuss; Alan A Aragon; Jose Antonio Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Fernando Naclerio; Eneko Larumbe-Zabala; Robert Cooper; Judith Allgrove; Conrad P Earnest Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Billy Sperlich; Martin Becker; Andreas Hotho; Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich; Mahdi Sareban; Kay Winkert; Jürgen M Steinacker; Gunnar Treff Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 4.566