OBJECTIVE: Shortcomings created by the lack of both a uniform definition of ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) and reporting standards have led to widely ranging infections rates (2-24%) whose significance is uncertain. We propose a standardized definition of VAI and a consistent reporting format compliant with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for device-related infections. Using those parameters to establish an infection-control surveillance program, we report our 4-year institutional VAI rates. METHODS: In this prospective study covering ventriculostomy utilization (October 2006-December 2010), 498 patients had a total of 4,673 ventriculostomy days. By review of the literature and our institutional analysis, we defined VAI as a positive CSF culture in a patient with ventriculostomy catheter, plus one or more of the following (1) fever recorded >101.5 °F or (2) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose level, either <50 mg/dL or <50% of a serum glucose level drawn within 24 h of the CSF glucose. In a report format that is CDC compliant, rates of VAI are reported. RESULTS: Among our patients, the CDC-compliant infection rate was 2.14 per 1,000 ventriculostomy days. Of the 10 VAIs occurring in 498 patients during 4,673 ventriculostomy days, this 2.0% infection rate was lower than the previously reported 8.8% composite rates of VAI. Average duration of ventriculostomy was 9.4 days. Neither antibiotic-impregnated catheters nor periprocedural or prophylactic antibiotics were used. CONCLUSIONS: Our standardized VAI definition and CDC format seems promising toward facilitating future study and guideline development. Given our strict protocol of sterile catheter placement and care, and our institution's low 2.0% infection rates, we propose an infection-rate target of ≤5 per 1,000 device days. Our results suggest that the use of antibiotics or antibiotic-impregnated catheters is unwarranted--a positive given concerns of evolving anti-microbial resistance.
OBJECTIVE: Shortcomings created by the lack of both a uniform definition of ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) and reporting standards have led to widely ranging infections rates (2-24%) whose significance is uncertain. We propose a standardized definition of VAI and a consistent reporting format compliant with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for device-related infections. Using those parameters to establish an infection-control surveillance program, we report our 4-year institutional VAI rates. METHODS: In this prospective study covering ventriculostomy utilization (October 2006-December 2010), 498 patients had a total of 4,673 ventriculostomy days. By review of the literature and our institutional analysis, we defined VAI as a positive CSF culture in a patient with ventriculostomy catheter, plus one or more of the following (1) fever recorded >101.5 °F or (2) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose level, either <50 mg/dL or <50% of a serum glucose level drawn within 24 h of the CSF glucose. In a report format that is CDC compliant, rates of VAI are reported. RESULTS: Among our patients, the CDC-compliant infection rate was 2.14 per 1,000 ventriculostomy days. Of the 10 VAIs occurring in 498 patients during 4,673 ventriculostomy days, this 2.0% infection rate was lower than the previously reported 8.8% composite rates of VAI. Average duration of ventriculostomy was 9.4 days. Neither antibiotic-impregnated catheters nor periprocedural or prophylactic antibiotics were used. CONCLUSIONS: Our standardized VAI definition and CDC format seems promising toward facilitating future study and guideline development. Given our strict protocol of sterile catheter placement and care, and our institution's low 2.0% infection rates, we propose an infection-rate target of ≤5 per 1,000 device days. Our results suggest that the use of antibiotics or antibiotic-impregnated catheters is unwarranted--a positive given concerns of evolving anti-microbial resistance.
Authors: Joon-Hyung Kim; Naman S Desai; Joseph Ricci; Philip E Stieg; Axel J Rosengart; Roger Härtl; Justin F Fraser Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Jonathan R Edwards; Kelly D Peterson; Yi Mu; Shailendra Banerjee; Katherine Allen-Bridson; Gloria Morrell; Margaret A Dudeck; Daniel A Pollock; Teresa C Horan Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Yaseen Arabi; Ziad A Memish; Hanan H Balkhy; Christine Francis; Ahmad Ferayan; Abdullah Al Shimemeri; Maha A Almuneef Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Ian Pople; Wai Poon; Richard Assaker; David Mathieu; Mark Iantosca; Ernest Wang; Li Wei Zhang; Gilberto Leung; Paul Chumas; Philippe Menei; Laurent Beydon; Mark Hamilton; Ian Kamaly; Stephen Lewis; Wang Ning; J Thomas Megerian; Matthew J McGirt; Jeffrey A Murphy; Aileen Michael; Torstein Meling Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Ariane Lewis; Sarah Wahlster; Sarah Karinja; Barry M Czeisler; W Taylor Kimberly; Aaron S Lord Journal: Br J Neurosurg Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 1.596
Authors: Maria M Reyes; Satish Munigala; Emily L Church; Tobias B Kulik; Salah G Keyrouz; Gregory J Zipfel; David K Warren Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.254