Ariane Lewis1, Sarah Wahlster2,3, Sarah Karinja1,4, Barry M Czeisler1, W Taylor Kimberly2, Aaron S Lord1. 1. a Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology , NYU Langone Medical Center , New York , NY , USA. 2. b Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , MA , USA. 3. c Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology , Harborview Medical Center , Seattle , WA , USA. 4. d Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York , NY , USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Comparison of rates of ventriculostomy-related infections (VRIs) across institutions is difficult due to the lack of a standard definition. We sought to review published definitions of VRI and apply them to a test cohort to determine the degree of variability in VRI diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search for definitions of VRI using the search strings "ventriculostomy-related infection" and "ventriculostomy-associated infection." We applied these definitions to a test cohort of 18 positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures taken from ventriculostomies at two institutions to compare the frequency of infection using each definition. RESULTS: We found 16 unique definitions of VRI. When the definitions were applied to the test cohort, the frequency of infection ranged from 22 to 94% (median 61% with interquartile range (IQR) 56-74%). The concordance between VRI diagnosis and treatment with VRI-directed antibiotics for at least seven days ranged from 56 to 89% (median: 72%, IQR: 71-78%). CONCLUSIONS: The myriad of definitions in the literature produce widely different frequencies of infection. In order to compare rates of VRI between institutions for the purposes of qualitative metrics and research, a consistent definition of VRI is needed.
INTRODUCTION: Comparison of rates of ventriculostomy-related infections (VRIs) across institutions is difficult due to the lack of a standard definition. We sought to review published definitions of VRI and apply them to a test cohort to determine the degree of variability in VRI diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search for definitions of VRI using the search strings "ventriculostomy-related infection" and "ventriculostomy-associated infection." We applied these definitions to a test cohort of 18 positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures taken from ventriculostomies at two institutions to compare the frequency of infection using each definition. RESULTS: We found 16 unique definitions of VRI. When the definitions were applied to the test cohort, the frequency of infection ranged from 22 to 94% (median 61% with interquartile range (IQR) 56-74%). The concordance between VRI diagnosis and treatment with VRI-directed antibiotics for at least seven days ranged from 56 to 89% (median: 72%, IQR: 71-78%). CONCLUSIONS: The myriad of definitions in the literature produce widely different frequencies of infection. In order to compare rates of VRI between institutions for the purposes of qualitative metrics and research, a consistent definition of VRI is needed.
Authors: Joon-Hyung Kim; Naman S Desai; Joseph Ricci; Philip E Stieg; Axel J Rosengart; Roger Härtl; Justin F Fraser Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Yaseen Arabi; Ziad A Memish; Hanan H Balkhy; Christine Francis; Ahmad Ferayan; Abdullah Al Shimemeri; Maha A Almuneef Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Rogier P Schade; Janke Schinkel; Freek W C Roelandse; Ronald B Geskus; Leo G Visser; J Marc C van Dijk; Marc C Van Dijk; Joan H C Voormolen; Hans Van Pelt; Ed J Kuijper Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: K L Holloway; T Barnes; S Choi; R Bullock; L F Marshall; H M Eisenberg; J A Jane; J D Ward; H F Young; A Marmarou Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: William J Kitchen; Navneet Singh; Sharon Hulme; James Galea; Hiren C Patel; Andrew T King Journal: Br J Neurosurg Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 1.596
Authors: Maria M Reyes; Satish Munigala; Emily L Church; Tobias B Kulik; Salah G Keyrouz; Gregory J Zipfel; David K Warren Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Stefan Yu Bögli; Sophie S Wang; Elisabeth Pietrzko; Achim Müller; Amanda Eisele; Emanuela Keller; Giovanna Brandi Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 4.003